Oral Argument: O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier | Case No. 22-324 | Date Argued: 10/31/2023 | Date Decided: 3/15/2024
Podcast: SCOTUS Oral Arguments and OpinionsPublished On: Tue Oct 31 2023
Description: Case Info: O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier | Case No. 22-324 | Date Argued: 10/31/2023 | Date Decided: 3/15/2024Question Presented: Whether a public official engages in state action subject to the First Amendment by blocking an individual from the official's personal social-media account, when the official uses the account to feature their job and communicate about job-related matters with the public, but does not do so pursuant to any governmental authority or duty.Holding: Judgment vacated and case remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion in Lindke v. Freed.Result: Vacated and remanded.Voting Breakdown: 9-0. Per Curiam opinion.Link to Opinion: Here.Oral Advocates:For Petitioners: Hashim M. Mooppan, Washington, D.C.; and Sopan Joshi, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. (for United States, as Amicus Curiae.)For Respondents: Pamela S. Karlan, Stanford, Cal.
The note was deleted
The note was saved
Your message was sent