RECAP: Kouri Richins Hearing Day 1
RECAP: Kouri Richins Hearing Day 1  
Podcast: Pretty Lies And Alibis
Published On: Wed Jan 07 2026
Description: In this episode of Pretty Lies & Alibis, we break down Day 1 of the Kouri Richins evidentiary hearing and the key expert testimony battles unfolding ahead of her upcoming trial.The defense sought to block three of the state’s expert witnesses, focusing heavily on the controversial “Pathway to Violence” model. Defense expert Dr. Fox testified that the model is not scientifically reliable, lacks peer-reviewed validation, has no known error rate, and cannot be used to predict individual acts of violence — arguing that its use amounts to profiling rather than science under Utah Rule of Evidence 702.The state countered with testimony from Dr. Ammon, who described the model as one of several tools used retrospectively in targeted violence prevention. The judge ultimately issued a partial ruling, limiting how the model may be used at trial.We also cover:The judge’s decision allowing a handwriting expert to testify regarding alleged forgeryWhy testimony from Dr. Sherry Veneno was ruled not currently relevant — but could be revisitedWhy Day 2 of the hearing will not be livestreamed due to sealed evidenceDonate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board) 00:00 – Intro: Pretty Lies & Alibis00:55 – Overview of Kouri Richins Day 1 evidentiary hearing01:20 – Day 2 will not be live streamed (sealed evidence)01:50 – Defense moves to exclude three state experts02:05 – Defense expert Dr. Fox challenges “Pathway to Violence” model02:45 – Why the model is not diagnostic or predictive03:35 – Lack of statistics, probability, or error rate04:10 – Rule 702: standards for expert testimony04:45 – Model not peer-reviewed or scientifically validated05:30 – No standardized methodology; risk of inconsistent conclusions06:15 – False positives and profiling concerns06:45 – “Predicting violence after the fact” analogy07:35 – Model not intended for individual cases like Kouri Richins08:10 – FBI background and lack of exposure to the model08:45 – State expert Dr. Ammon testifies in support of the model09:15 – Judge’s ruling on Dr. Ammon’s testimony09:50 – Handwriting expert allowed to testify on forgery counts10:20 – Dr. Sherry Veneno’s testimony deemed not yet relevant10:55 – Closing thoughts and wrap-upBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout  - NEW STYLES Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)