From A to Arbitration episodes

From A to Arbitration

<p>A Union Representative's in-depth Guide to the Dispute Resolution Process</p>

The note was deleted

The note was saved

Top Keywords
Episodes

fromatoarbitration.com

fromatoiarbitration.com

fromatoarbitration.com Bahakel C-30984 Bennett C-37199 Stanton 35391

fromatoarbitration.com

Fromatoarbitration.com

fromatoarbitration.com

In this episode Badmouth and JT talk about burn out and how we can avoid it Mental Health Episode - The CCA Corner Volume 12

fromatoarbitration.com

concernedlettercarriers.com

fromatoarbitration.com Hutt c-20449 Caraway C-01702 Erbs C-06914

fromatoarbitration.com

fromatoarbitratiomn.com Roberts C-34731 Stanton C-35086

Leo joins the CCA Corner again to discuss the Joint Statement on Violence and Behavior in the Workplace https://www.dallasapwu.org/uploads/6/6/4/0/6640190/abusive_supervisor_incident_worksheet___statement_form.pdf

fromatoarbitration.com Gilder c-34064 Durham c-32578 Harris c-30400 Hutt c-17710 Morris c-36279 August c-30564

fromatoarbitration.com

concernedlettercarriers.com

fromatoarbitration.com

concernedlettercarriers.com

Its year end wrap up time. Thanks so much for a year of the CCA Corner and we look forward to many more

fromatoarbitration.com

CCA Corner

concernedlettercarriers.com

Fromatoarbitration.com

fromatoarbitration.com

concernedlettercarriers.com

fromatoarbitration.com Powell c-11012 Bahakel c-34086 Martin c-10686 Deitsch c-12618

fromatoarbitration.com cites cenci c-28435 Sherman c-27929 durham c-26456

fromatoarbitration.com

If you are interested in getting involved with contract rally work groups or joining the planning WhatsApp group, email NALCchris@gmail.com or visit https://www.fightingnalc.com

fromatoarbitrationj.com

fromatoarbitration.com

concernedlettercarriers.com

fromatoarbitration.com

https://fromatoarbitration.com/

fromatoarbitration.com

concernedlettercarriers.com

fromatoarbitration.com

concernedlettercarriers.com

fromatoarbitration.com

concernedlettercarriers.com

fromatoarbitration.com

concernedlettercarriers.com

fromatoarbitration.com

Fromatoarbitration.com

concernedlettercarriers.com

fromatoarbitration.com

Corey opens "The Lion's Den" by reiterating his commitment to providing strictly educational content, aiming for episodes to be around thirty minutes. He begins with shout-outs to Branch 3028 in Texas, acknowledging the devastating floods they experienced and offering prayers. He also promotes fundraising events for CLC candidates Richie Ray (Region 15) and Bill Kribel (Region 12). Corey then issues a challenge to EVP Paul Barner, referencing past instances where labor reportedly influenced arbitrators to amend decisions or remove them from panels. He highlights a specific regional arbitrator's statement of not abiding by a national arbitrator's decision and challenges Barner to take action against this regional arbitrator, drawing a parallel to labor's alleged ability to influence arbitrator removals. Corey stresses his own commitment to never complying with such requests if he were in a leadership position, emphasizing that it's management's responsibility to adhere to national decisions. The core of the episode involves Corey reading several key M-documents and an arbitration decision related to PET, DOIS, and route time standards. He stresses the importance of these documents for carriers to understand their rights and for stewards to build cases, framing it as a choice between being "good" or "great" in their advocacy. He reads M-01664, M-01444, M-00385, M-00326, M-01769, M-00829, and M-00005, explaining how each document reinforces that DOIS/PET projections are not the sole determinant of a carrier's workload or performance and cannot be the basis for discipline without proper, documented evidence like efficiency counts (e.g., 4584s or 1838Cs). He emphasizes that management's reliance on these projections, especially when they fail to conduct proper observations or when mail volume is not accurately accounted for, is a violation of the National Agreement. Corey then reads an arbitration decision (C-29806 by Arbitrator Jonathan Monette from 2012) concerning a "pivot board" in San Diego, which he connects to the current issue of "auto pivots" and management's continued misuse of DOIS. He details how the arbitrator ruled against management's use of the pivot board and DOIS as the primary tool for determining workload and leave times, emphasizing the arbitrator's findings that such practices violated the M-39 and M-41 handbooks and national agreements. The arbitrator ordered management to cease and desist from using pivot boards, using DOIS as the primary tool, and instructing carriers on leave times without proper discussion. Finally, Corey shares a brief story about a carrier who refused to use a vehicle with a broken air conditioner, was instructed to take lunch, and consequently faced a grievance. He uses this to underscore the paramount importance of carrier safety, stating that management's disregard for it is a recurring theme and urging carriers to grieve such situations rather than take undue risks. He expresses his continued dedication to educating the membership and fighting for their rights, looking forward to the CLC's takeover and the increased transparency and fight they aim to bring. Concernedlettercarriers.com

Corey begins by apologizing for removing a Saturday episode and explains his intention to keep "The Lion's Den" episodes focused. He starts with shout-outs, first to Mallory, and then to Badmouth Morris, a friend and advocate for city letter carriers who is currently facing hardship and has a GoFundMe. He also thanks Branch 3792 in Midland, Texas, and acknowledges David Bryant from Iowa for his advocacy. Corey then expresses his strong disagreement with the notion that the NALC provides sufficient education to all its members, citing feedback from individuals who learned more from his podcast than union meetings. He contrasts this with the extensive educational efforts of James Henry, the current CLC candidate for president, whose responsibilities have reportedly been stripped due to his candidacy. Corey passionately defends James Henry against what he describes as a smear campaign, highlighting Henry's extensive resume and vision for change within the union. He criticizes the current leadership and those who oppose Henry, accusing them of clinging to the status quo and using divisive tactics. Corey then explains the reason for deleting his Saturday episode: extreme anger stemming from a video of a young female carrier in Chicago who brought her children to work in her vehicle. While acknowledging the carrier's actions were wrong, Corey empathizes with her situation, imagining her struggles with childcare and attendance, and her potential reliance on the promises made by the current president regarding pay increases. He sees this as a reflection of the broader issues faced by carriers, such as financial hardship, attendance-related discipline, and the union's leadership failing to deliver on promises. This empathy and anger led to a highly charged episode he felt compelled to remove. Corey reiterates that management is the "enemy" and describes their tactics as dishonest, disloyal, and harmful to carriers. He criticizes the misuse of tools like PET, DOIS, the 16.7, and scanners, as well as the weaponization of attendance policies and the hijacking of the grievance procedure, citing examples of management refusing to settle grievances or falsifying documentation. He contrasts this with James Henry's vision for a more aggressive, educational, and transparent union, emphasizing the "Dogs of War" initiative to tackle toxic work environments and other issues by holding management, including district managers and AVPs, accountable. Corey expresses his excitement for the upcoming changes under the CLC, promising to educate all members, not just stewards and advocates, and to be transparent with live Zoom sessions. He encourages listeners to educate themselves and volunteer for the new teams being formed. fromatoarbitration.com https://gofund.me/1215dffd

Corey begins "The Lion's Den" by informing listeners that he will be pre-recording the upcoming "From A to Arbitration" episode due to his attendance at the Texas State Convention. He then emphasizes his desire to keep "The Lion's Den" episodes focused and relatively short, though he anticipates today's will be longer due to reading arbitration sites. He references last week's episode where he played a teleconference recording, highlighting the "disdain" and "incompetence" of upper management towards city letter carriers, and reiterating his long-held belief that they need to be more aggressive in their approach. Corey stresses the importance of education within the union and mentions that the incoming CLC leadership will bring a more militant and offensive approach. Corey then dedicates the majority of the episode to reading and analyzing three arbitration sites. He explains that reading arbitration decisions is a crucial self-education tool, allowing one to understand management's arguments, the union's positions, and the arbitrators' decisions. The first case, from February 2009, deals with the Postal Service's use of DOIS (Delivery Operations Information System) projections to set carriers' daily office and street times, and whether this created a hostile work environment. Corey notes how management's arguments then are remarkably similar to current ones, particularly regarding PET and DOIS. He meticulously breaks down the union's and management's arguments, as well as the arbitrator's findings, highlighting how the misuse of DOIS primarily as a basis for setting leave and return times and the resulting stressful environment violated the M-39 handbook and related settlements. The second case, from 2015, addresses similar issues of management using DOIS projections as the sole determinant of carriers' leaving times and the practice of announcing all mail is up before it's actually distributed, leading to undue stress. Corey reads the facts, the parties' positions, and the arbitrator's discussion and findings, emphasizing how these practices created an impossible situation for carriers. He draws parallels to the current use of PET and the denial of 3996s. The third arbitration site, from 2019, focuses on the removal of a CCA for "unsatisfactory performance," specifically for exceeding projected times. Corey highlights how management failed to provide evidence of actual misconduct or time-wasting habits, instead relying solely on DOIS/PET projections. He points out that management did not conduct proper street observations or gather evidence like 4584s or 1838-Cs to support their claims. Corey concludes by reiterating the importance of these arbitration sites for understanding arguments, contractual language, and management's tactics, and promises to continue educating the membership on these critical issues. concernedlettercarriers.com

Corey begins by thanking listeners and giving a shout-out to branch 82 in Portland for their hospitality during a recent visit. He also expresses gratitude for the birthday wishes he received. Corey then discusses a troubling teleconference recording he heard, featuring two upper management individuals who demonstrated a severe lack of understanding regarding postal contracts and operational realities. He highlights their reliance on unrealistic metrics like PET and DOIS, and the detrimental impact this has on supervisors and managers, who are then pressured to enforce these impossible standards. Corey emphasizes how this creates a toxic work environment, particularly for injured employees, as illustrated by the unprofessional and disdainful attitude displayed by one of the managers in the recording. Corey then shifts to analyzing a screenshot of management directives for city letter carriers. He criticizes several of these directives, including those concerning "no lunch" requests, mandatory personal phone contact for unscheduled leave, and the expectation for carriers to gather by scanner bays before their shift begins. Corey explains that these directives are often local policies that conflict with established handbooks and manuals, and that grieving them under Article 5 (past practice) and Article 41, Section 3k (prohibiting work off the clock) is appropriate. He also addresses the rising cost of uniforms and the potential for carriers to be sent home due to a lack of approved footwear, stating this also warrants a grievance. Furthermore, Corey discusses the disallowance of 3996s based on "delivery program estimates," which he connects back to the problematic metrics discussed earlier, and expresses concern about directives regarding route parcel verification and PM office time. He also mentions that management is increasingly refusing to meet and resolve grievances, instead sending them up the chain, and suggests including Article 19 and the USPS/NALC Joint Statement of Expectations in grievances related to this issue. Corey reiterates his commitment to addressing these issues and improving the workroom environment through the "Dogs of War" initiative, noting the overwhelming positive response he received for it. He concludes by urging listeners to be safe, especially in the heat, and expresses optimism for positive changes ahead. fromatoarbitration.com

In this episode of "The Lion's Den," Corey begins by apologizing for the delayed episode due to his travels and a lengthy search for a crucial audio recording. He describes the recording as a teleconference featuring a district manager and a station manager, highlighting it as a perfect example of the disconnect between upper management and frontline supervisors, and how upper management's directives create a hostile work environment. Corey expresses his intent to play snippets of this recording to illustrate how management discusses carrier performance, injuries, and the misuse of tools like PET (Performance Evaluation Tool) and DOIS (Delivery Operations System). Corey reiterates his focus on route protection and explains that PET and DOIS are central to this discussion. He elaborates on how these systems are used to set unrealistic expectations for carriers, particularly regarding office time and street performance, often disregarding fixed office duties, breaks, and individual circumstances. He shares his frustration with management's ignorance of established procedures and prior arbitration decisions, such as the lack of a street standard and the prohibition of using single-day counts for discipline. Corey then provides extensive grievance advice, referencing key legal and contractual documents that carriers and stewards can use to combat management's misuse of PET and DOS. He cites National Level Settlements M-01769 and M-01664, which clearly state that projections from these tools are not the sole determinant of a carrier's workload and cannot be used as the basis for discipline. He also references M-00304 and M-01444, which address the lack of street standards and the prohibition of using PET or DOIS as the sole basis for discipline. Corey emphasizes the importance of documenting everything, including carrier statements, management's words, and the actual conditions of the route, and advises carriers to request copies of all relevant forms, like the 3996 and 1017b. He critically analyzes the management's perspective heard in the audio, pointing out their focus on numbers over carrier well-being, their disregard for carrier injuries and requests for breaks, and their failure to follow proper procedures for performance evaluation and documentation. Corey stresses that management's actions, particularly the directives from upper management to use PET and DOS despite their flaws, directly contribute to a hostile work environment. Corey concludes by expressing his dedication to fighting these issues, promising that when the CLC takes over, they will have specialized teams well-versed in OSHA, grievances, and confronting management's ignorance and abusive practices. He reiterates his deep love for the city letter carriers and his unwavering commitment to their safety and well-being, urging them to protect themselves and to rely on the union for support and education. concernedlettercarriers.com

Mallory and Badmouth host a roundtable discussion focused on the Building and Fighting NALC (BFN) initiative, CCA Summer, and organizing CCAs. They begin by acknowledging the loss of fellow carriers Jacob JT Taylor and Dan Workman, stressing the dangers of the job and the importance of looking out for one another. The core of the episode centers on the BFN's "CCA Summer" program, aimed at providing support and education to CCAs, particularly on Amazon Sundays, where they often face demoralizing conditions, lack of information, and limited union presence. Chris Persampieri from Branch 34 Boston, along with Ryan Miller and Dennis Carson, details how they initiated their outreach by showing up at Amazon Sunday locations with coffee and donuts, educating CCAs about their rights, pay, and the importance of union involvement. They discovered a significant knowledge gap among new CCAs regarding basic union functions and contractual benefits. Ernest Gonzales from Branch 421 San Antonio and Cesar Hernandez from the same branch discuss their efforts in Texas. Ernest highlights the BFN's national platform, fightingnalc.com, and the available resources like informational flyers and scripts for organizers. Cesar emphasizes the importance of reaching out to CCAs and RCAs, especially in underserved areas of Texas, and the need for a union presence that understands their specific struggles. He speaks about the necessity of having representatives who share similar backgrounds and languages, like himself, to effectively organize and advocate for members. The roundtable highlights the challenges of organizing due to the demanding nature of the CCA job, the lack of consistent union support in some areas, and the deliberate tactics used by management to divide employees. They stress that even small gestures, like offering water or simply being present and available, can make a significant difference. The need for CCAs to know their rights regarding breaks and scheduling, and to utilize union representation for any issues, is reiterated. The conversation also touches on the importance of state associations and congressional advocacy, with a call to action to support HR 1065, the Postal Police Reform Act, which aims to provide better protection for letter carriers. There's a discussion about the ongoing fight for better wages and working conditions for CCAs, with BFN advocating for an all-career workforce and a $30 per hour wage. The episode concludes with plugs for various podcasts, upcoming events, and resources for those interested in getting involved in organizing and union activism. https://www.fightingnalc.com/cca-summer-materials http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/ https://fromatoarbitration.com/cca-corner/

Corey returns after attending a "Next Generation Carrier's" Zoom event and traveling to Seattle. He expresses his enthusiasm for the city letter carrier movement and the growing solidarity among different podcast hosts and carriers. He previews upcoming interviews with Pam Donato, a candidate for Director of Retirees and OWCP on the CLC slate, and James Brennan, a candidate for President of the Rural Carrier craft. Corey then delves into crucial safety matters, particularly regarding heat. He emphasizes the importance of understanding and utilizing various union documents and NALC resources when filing safety grievances. He meticulously breaks down key articles from the National Agreement (Article 14 and Article 19), the Employee and Labor Relations Manual (ELM 8-Safety, Health, and Environment), and handbooks like EL801 and EL814. These sections highlight management's responsibilities and commitments to providing a safe working environment, which Corey stresses are vital for grieving management's failures. He specifically points out language regarding management's commitment to preventing injuries, their responsibility for employee well-being, and the requirement for training. He addresses common questions and issues raised by carriers concerning heat, such as broken air conditioning in offices, managers denying breaks, and the misuse of stationary time. Corey provides practical advice for carriers, including how to use PS Form 1767 to report hazards, the importance of documenting all interactions with management, and how to handle situations when denied breaks or assistance. He criticizes management's disregard for carrier safety, particularly when it conflicts with production numbers, and vows that the CLC, if elected, will create specialized teams to address these issues and hold management accountable. Corey then transitions to his interview with Pam Donato, who shares her extensive background in the union, starting as a steward in 1989 and progressing to branch president and a special assistant at NALC headquarters. She discusses her work in community outreach and her decision to join James Henry's CLC slate for the upcoming election, driven by a shared vision for a stronger, more responsive union. Pam expresses her belief in the power of the city letter carrier movement and her commitment to rebuilding the NALC. Following Pam's segment, Corey interviews James Brennan, a candidate for President of the Rural Carrier union. James echoes Corey's sentiments about the need for a fighting spirit, addressing toxic work environments, and holding management accountable. He criticizes the current leadership for their detachment from the craft and their handling of contract negotiations, highlighting specific instances of perceived failures. James emphasizes the importance of solidarity between city and rural carriers and calls for a unified effort to improve working conditions, fair pay, and management accountability. He stresses the need for updated union information systems to better support stewards and carriers. Both Corey and James express their shared goal of creating a union that actively fights for its members and makes a positive impact on the workroom floor. fromatoarbitration.com

In this episode of "The Lion's Den," Corey returns after traveling to Seattle and immediately dives into the topic of route protection, specifically addressing the use of the Performance Evaluation Tool (PET) and its misuse by management. He begins by describing an audio recording he possesses of a district manager berating a station manager for not adhering to PET projections, even when the station manager cited mail volume and carrier restrictions. Corey highlights how upper management's insistence on PET, which he argues is flawed and doesn't account for real-world conditions like office time, parcel counts, or weather, creates a toxic work environment. He plans to play a snippet of this audio in future episodes, provided it doesn't compromise the source. Corey then thoroughly explains PET, its purpose, and its limitations, emphasizing that it consistently assigns the same street time regardless of mail volume and fails to account for essential office tasks. He details how PET projections are used to create an unfavorable "office time" metric, automatically putting carriers at a disadvantage. He also explains how management uses PET and other tools like DOS (Delivery Operations System) to justify disciplinary actions, despite national-level settlements like M-1769 and M-1664 that state these projections are not the sole determinant of a carrier's workload or return time. Corey provides extensive grievance advice for situations involving PET, including proper issue statements, facts to document, and relevant contractual provisions and settlements. He stresses the importance of carriers verbally informing management if they cannot complete their routes in eight hours, requesting a PS Form 3996 (Carrier Auxiliary Control), filling it out completely with detailed reasons, and keeping a copy. He advises carriers not to argue with management but to politely ask for instructions and to call back to the office for clarification if needed, always documenting these interactions. He also touches upon the misuse of PS Form 1571 (Undelivered Mail Report) when management instructs carriers to curtail mail, and the denial of 3996 requests based on PET projections, particularly in the context of "auto-pivot" plans. He criticizes the union's current leadership for not adequately addressing these issues and for the perceived inadequacy of DRT (Dispute Resolution Team) decisions, which often seem to favor management. Corey expresses his deep frustration with the "establishment" within the union, accusing some of prioritizing their positions over the well-being of city letter carriers. He vows that if elected EVP, he will lead a militant union that actively confronts management and addresses these issues, prioritizing the carriers and creating a safe and harmonious work environment. He draws an analogy to the movie "300," emphasizing the need for the union to take the fight to postal management rather than waiting for problems to arise. Corey reiterates his commitment to the city letter carrier and his determination to bring about change, encouraging carriers to prepare for upcoming route inspections and to stand up for their rights. He ends by expressing his love for the city letter carriers and assuring them that better days are coming when the CLC ticket, with James Henry as president, takes over. He also announces his upcoming appearances on other podcasts and his continued dedication to addressing heat safety and route protection issues. concernedlettercarriers.com

In this emergency episode of "The CCA Corner," Mallory and Badmouth address the critical issue of heat safety, prompted by the recent passing of two union brothers, Jacob JT Taylor and Dan Workman, due to heat-related causes. They emphasize the increased danger of the job, especially during heat waves affecting various regions. The episode features extensive information sourced from OSHA, CDC, EPA, and carrier experiences, with a disclaimer that they are not medical professionals. The hosts detail the symptoms and first aid for heat exhaustion and the more severe heat stroke, stressing the importance of recognizing signs like confusion, dizziness, and elevated body temperature, and calling 911 immediately. They also introduce less commonly discussed heat illnesses like Rhabdomyolysis (rhabdo), heat syncope, and heat cramps. The discussion covers medications and pre-existing conditions that increase susceptibility to heat illness. They stress the importance of consulting doctors about these risks. Practical advice is provided on what management can supply (ice, water, electrolyte powders, cooling towels, sunscreen, fans) and what carriers can purchase themselves, such as coolers, water jugs, lightweight clothing, cooling vests, extra socks, and personal fans. They advocate for framing these items as safety gear to management and utilizing the union for procurement if management is unresponsive. Tips for staying cool include drinking plenty of water and electrolytes, preferably cold, and consuming hydrating foods like fruits and lightly salted snacks. They advise against chugging water and recommend avoiding alcohol and excessive caffeine. They also cover using cooling towels on pulse points, feet in ice water, and exploring accessible air-conditioned spaces. Mallory shares her personal experiences with heat illness, crying from heat stress being her trigger to seek cooler temperatures, and finding relief through various cooling methods. Morris emphasizes the importance of hydrating the night before, drinking fluids consistently throughout the day, and using electrolyte supplements. He also shares tips on keeping coolers cold and utilizing wet wipes or makeup remover wipes for hygiene. The episode stresses the importance of documenting heat exposure and conditions on 3999s, taking breaks diligently, and never refusing water offered by customers. They highlight the value of building a community through group chats to check on fellow carriers and sharing resources like accessible restrooms or cooling spots. They also mention the NALC's Heat Illness Prevention Program and the new Employee Retention Program, which allows consultation with other carriers about route conditions. Finally, they conclude with a solidarity soapbox, encouraging CCAs and all carriers to look out for each other, offer water and support, and to push for necessary breaks. Episode Summary https://fromatoarbitration.com/ https://fromatoarbitration.com/cca-corner/

The main focus of the episode is heat safety, with Corey expressing his frustration and anger over management's perceived double standards and negligence. He criticizes the USPS for falsifying HIPP training, citing instances where safety managers allegedly told carriers that HIPP training is no longer conducted, despite official USPS materials indicating its continuation. Corey contrasts this with the strict enforcement of safety rules for carriers, such as those related to seat belts and wheel curving, which can lead to emergency placements. He argues that managers who make unsafe statements, like limiting breaks only when temperatures reach 110 degrees, are not held accountable. Corey then reads two documents provided by Manny Peralta, NALC's Director of Safety and Health. These documents detail the USPS's Heat Illness Prevention Program (HIPP) for 2025, outlining training requirements, responsibilities for management, and emergency procedures. The materials emphasize the importance of calling 911 for heat-related illnesses and the need for carriers to look out for one another. Corey highlights the stark contrast between these official safety guidelines and the actions of some managers. He also shares a list of letter carriers who have tragically died due to heat-related illnesses in recent years, underscoring the seriousness of the issue. Corey reiterates his commitment, if elected EVP, to address these safety concerns and management's misconduct. He vows to target negligent managers and supervisors, using grievances and OSHA complaints to make examples of them and change the culture within the Postal Service. He expresses his unwavering stance against the establishment and his dedication to prioritizing the city letter carrier, stating that he will not change his principles, even if it means not being elected. Corey concludes by expressing his deep love and concern for the city letter carriers, emphasizing that their safety and well-being are paramount. He encourages carriers to continue supporting each other, as their union leadership has largely failed them. He promises to handle the "establishment bullshit" and assures listeners that the CLC ticket, with James Henry as president, will bring integrity and a focus on the carriers back to the union. fromatoarbitration.com

In this episode of "The Lion's Den," Corey concludes his six-part series on the M39 Handbook's Section 2, focusing on route inspections and six-day counts. He expresses relief at finishing the lengthy reading, highlighting its importance for stewards to become specialists in route inspections, which can benefit their station, district, and area. He then delves into the specifics of various route adjustment reports: the Existing Route Summary Report, the Adjusted Route Summary Report, the Allied Time Report, the Territory Transfer Summary Report, and the Route Summary Report. Corey meticulously explains the purpose and content of each report, guiding listeners on how to interpret the data, compare existing and adjusted route values, and identify potential discrepancies or validations needed. He stresses the importance of comparing totals between reports and documenting any time changes or territory transfers, referencing the Form 1840 Reverse. He also points out the critical detail that allied time does not automatically transfer and must be manually moved by management. Corey provides detailed explanations of each section within the Route Summary Report, including possible deliveries, allied time, street time, office time, priority time, and total route time. He also breaks down the allied time details, explaining loading, travel to, travel from, travel within, deadhead, and relay times, noting that relays often have zero time associated with them, which may indicate an issue. He highlights the Territory Transfer Summary Report's utility in arguing against scheme changes that management may not have minimized as required. Looking ahead, Corey announces that the following Wednesday's episode will focus on "route protection," a crucial topic for new stewards preparing for September 1st, when new processes may be implemented. He also mentions his continued commitment to heat safety during the summer months, sharing his personal experience with a walking route and the significant difference in heat exposure compared to riding routes. He advises listeners to stay safe, hydrate, and take breaks as needed, emphasizing that their health and safety are paramount. Corey announces upcoming podcast guests: John Murphy from Next Generation Carriers for a discussion on heat safety on Sunday the 13th, and Pam Donato from the CLC ticket, whom he describes as a strong advocate for city letter carriers. He concludes by thanking his listeners, encouraging them to prioritize their safety and hydrate, and jokingly congratulating them on becoming "official union nerds" for listening to all the episodes. Concernedlettercarriers.com

In this episode, Corey discusses the crucial topic of the Heat Illness Prevention Program (HIPP) training and related safety issues. He begins by addressing a recent report that a safety manager claimed HIPP training is no longer conducted, which he calls a grievance and vows to address if elected EVP. Corey then reads a communication from Manny Peralta, head of safety and health for the NALC, which details the 2025 HIPP requirements, including specific training materials and the importance of supervisors calling 911 in case of heat-related emergencies. He contrasts the postal service's stated priority of employee safety with instances of management's alleged negligence, such as a carrier being placed on emergency placement for calling 911 during a medical emergency. Corey also highlights a positive example of an MPOO (installation head) who instructed supervisors to deliver electrolytes and allow carriers to cool down in staff cars, contrasting this with a manager who reportedly stated that additional breaks are only permissible when the temperature reaches 110 degrees. Corey shares advice from a thirty-one-year carrier, emphasizing the importance of documenting all communications with management, requesting CA-1 forms when feeling ill, and taking necessary breaks. He relays the senior carrier's analogy of being the captain of one's own ship, encouraging carriers to prioritize their safety. He reiterates his commitment, if elected EVP, to target managers who issue dangerous directives and create toxic work environments, promising to bring the full force of the NALC to bear on such individuals. A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to Corey addressing allegations made on Mike Caref's podcast. Corey refutes claims about his integrity, particularly regarding a 50/50 raffle at the Illinois State Convention. He clarifies the situation, explaining that he bought tickets and instructed the organizer to give any winnings to James Henry, and that the organizer thanked him for his support. Corey expresses disappointment that his attempt to do something nice was politicized and distorted, and he criticizes Mike Caref for allowing lies about him and James Henry on his podcast. Corey asserts his unwavering commitment to the city letter carrier craft and his anti-establishment stance, emphasizing that he will not compromise his principles, even if it affects his electoral prospects. The episode concludes with Corey re-emphasizing the critical nature of heat safety, urging carriers to hydrate, take breaks, and prioritize their well-being. He expresses his love for the city letter carriers and his determination to protect them, promising to address political matters and hold those accountable who spread lies. fromatoarbitration.com

In this episode, Corey Walton joins Josh and Bill to discuss various issues affecting postal workers. Corey begins by mentioning his appearance on the "United We Scan" podcast, a rural carrier podcast where he discussed the city letter carriers' movement to change union leadership. Josh describes the oppressive heat and the challenges of working in an LLV without air conditioning, emphasizing the need for carriers to take breaks when necessary, regardless of management's directives. He also touches upon route adjustments and how they are working in his favor. Bill, a retiree, shares his experiences handling various office situations, particularly those related to heat. He expresses frustration with management's response to the heat, the lack of air conditioning in LLVs, and the need for proactive measures to protect carriers. He also highlights public concern for postal workers' safety and the perceived incompetence of postal management. The podcast then delves into the core topic: the low voter turnout for a tentative agreement. Corey explains that social media and increased educational efforts, including podcasts and Zoom calls, were crucial in mobilizing city letter carriers to participate in union matters, unlike in the past. He contrasts this with the perceived apathy in the rural carrier craft, attributing it partly to the evaluated route system, which encourages individual focus rather than collective action. Corey stresses the importance of "love" and unity within the union, arguing that these qualities are essential for protecting members and driving change. He criticizes the current leadership for prioritizing financial gain over the well-being of the craft and calls for a new generation of leaders who are committed to fighting for the carriers. The discussion continues with an examination of the NALC's handling of the tentative agreement, with Corey detailing the promises made and ultimately not kept regarding wage increases and an all-career workforce. He expresses disappointment with President Renfroe's leadership and the arbitration process. The conversation broadens to include the struggles of CCAs, the differences in delivering mail compared to past decades, and the lack of appreciation shown to postal workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, drawing parallels to a previous incident where carriers received Lifesavers as a reward. They then address the issue of comparable work and how arbitrators value postal work, suggesting that UPS and FedEx are more appropriate comparisons than previously thought, given the increasing parcel volume and the demands of the job. The conversation highlights the need for union solidarity across different crafts and the importance of active participation in union affairs, such as conventions and local meetings, to effect change. The episode concludes with final thoughts, emphasizing the critical importance of hydration, safety, and unity, and reiterating the message that carriers must stand up for themselves and their craft to ensure a better future. https://www.facebook.com/groups/6657441934270929/ fromatoarbitration.com

In this episode of "The Lions' Den," Corey continues his in-depth discussion on six-day route counts, emphasizing the critical importance of understanding and utilizing various postal handbooks and forms like the M-39 and M-41. He highlights specific sections within these handbooks that empower carriers and shop stewards to challenge management's actions, particularly regarding office time, street time, and the proper handling of parcels. Corey stresses the need for meticulous documentation and paying close attention to details on forms like the 1838-C and 1840-B, as these are crucial for building grievances and protecting carriers' rights. He points out how management might attempt to manipulate these procedures, and provides guidance on how to identify and counter these tactics. Corey also touches upon the significance of heat safety, referencing past grievances and union strategies to protect carriers during hot weather. He reiterates that the city letter carrier's health and safety are paramount and encourages members to be informed and proactive in protecting themselves and their colleagues. The episode also mentions the importance of utilizing resources like Discord and Reddit for information sharing and support within the union. Corey highlights the upcoming CLC initiatives and expresses his commitment to educating and empowering members. concernedlettercarriers.com

Corey addresses the critical issue of heat safety for letter carriers, emphasizing the alarming frequency of heat-related illnesses and fatalities. He expresses frustration with the NALC's perceived inaction and lack of guidance on this matter, contrasting it with the proactive community efforts seen on social media. Corey highlights the importance of staying hydrated, taking breaks, and utilizing cooling methods like wearing light clothing and using towels. He reiterates that the carrier's health and safety are paramount, more important than mail volume or management directives. Corey details specific grievance procedures and contractual language from the M39 and M41 handbooks that support carriers' rights to take breaks and challenge management's attempts to penalize them for prioritizing their well-being. He also reviews past arbitration decisions and settlements, such as the cease and desist orders and monetary remedies, that can be used as precedents for current grievances. Corey shares his personal commitment to fighting for the carriers, even if it means facing criticism, and stresses the need for collective action and education to protect the membership. He announces that he will be resuming his regular podcast schedule and continuing to provide education on crucial topics like six-day counts and route protection. fromatoarbitration.com

Corey continues his deep dive into route inspections and the six-day count process, emphasizing the critical role of understanding and utilizing the M-39 and M-41 handbooks. He highlights how management may attempt to manipulate data and time, particularly concerning street waiting time and office time calculations. Corey stresses the importance of carriers being aware of their rights, meticulously documenting their work, and challenging any discrepancies or violations of the contract. He revisits specific sections of the handbooks and arbitration decisions, such as those relating to vehicle inspections, carrier consultations, and the proper use of forms like the 1838-C and 1840-B. Corey also touches upon the potential for grievances related to management's actions, especially in the context of the newer "autopivot" tools and the ongoing issues with heat safety. He reiterates the need for carriers to be informed and prepared, emphasizing that the union's strength lies in its educated membership. Corey also mentions his upcoming vacation and expresses his continued dedication to providing educational content, even from afar. concernedlettercarriers.com

Corey begins by expressing his frustrations with the current NALC leadership, particularly President Renfroe, whom he criticizes for incompetence, corruption, and a lack of integrity. He also touches upon the impact of his malfunctioning laptop on his recording schedule, but reaffirms his commitment to the city letter carrier craft. Corey then introduces and interviews Paul Perry, the branch president of NALC Branch 1100, the largest branch in the country. Perry shares his experiences at the Committee of Presidents (COP) meeting, where he challenged Renfroe's claims about the arbitration process and the TA. Perry recounts Renfroe's aggressive reactions and his apparent disregard for the membership's vote against the TA. Both Corey and Perry express their disdain for the leadership's actions and their commitment to fighting for the members. They also discuss the importance of the CLC movement and the need for reform within the union. Perry highlights the power of collective action and the significance of rank-and-file involvement in driving change, emphasizing that individual branches are making their voices heard. Corey expresses his admiration for Perry's passion and dedication and his hope for a positive future for the union with new leadership. The interview delves into the union's internal politics, the potential for constitutional amendments to limit presidential power, and the broader implications of the current situation for letter carriers across the country. The conversation also touches on the importance of education and awareness for new members, particularly CCAs, and the need for a stronger, more representative union. Fromatoarbitration.com

In this episode of "The Lions' Den," Corey continues his detailed breakdown of six-day route inspections and related union procedures, focusing on the critical aspects that can impact a carrier's time and potentially lead to grievances. He emphasizes the importance of understanding and utilizing specific forms like the 1838-C, 3999, and 1840, as well as contractual language and past arbitration decisions to protect carrier rights. Corey highlights how management may attempt to manipulate these processes, particularly regarding street waiting time and office time calculations, and advises carriers to meticulously document all interactions and potential discrepancies. He stresses the need to be aware of management's obligations, such as conducting annual route and unit reviews and providing carriers with advance copies of relevant forms and documentation. Corey also touches upon the significance of breaks and how management might attempt to restrict them, urging carriers to be informed and to file grievances if their rights are violated. He reinforces the idea that understanding these procedures is crucial for the city letter carrier, as it empowers them to protect their time and ensures fair treatment, especially in the face of management's potential "steal" tactics. The episode also includes a brief mention of future topics like route protection and the potential impact of new joint route adjustment processes. concernedlettercarriers.com

Mallory and Badmouth dedicate a significant portion of the podcast to the crucial topic of mental health, acknowledging its prevalence and impact within the postal service. They begin by honoring two fallen brothers, Mathew Rorie from Branch 41 and Dan Workman from Branch 113, and offer condolences and information for sending cards. The hosts emphasize the importance of destigmatizing mental health conversations, comparing mental health struggles to physical health issues and highlighting the prevalence of neurodivergence. They explain that society and work structures are often designed for neurotypical individuals, and it's okay for brains to work differently. The episode delves into various mental health concerns, including stress, burnout, low self-esteem, and specific conditions like depression, anxiety, PTSD, ADHD, and others, noting their often invisible nature. They stress that mental well-being affects not only the individual but also their families, coworkers, and customers, reinforcing the concept of solidarity and kindness. The podcast provides practical advice on seeking help, discussing different types of therapy (CBT, psychodynamic, humanistic, behavioral) and mental health professionals (psychologists, counselors, social workers, psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, primary care physicians), with a recommendation to use the Employee Assistance Program (EAP) as a primary resource. They highlight EAP's usefulness in finding local mental health professionals and its confidential, free nature, and also mention the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. The episode also touches on CareFirst benefits and resources like PsychologyToday.com for finding therapists. They encourage listeners to be their own best advocates, explore various treatment options, and not give up if the first approach isn't successful. The episode concludes with a powerful message of solidarity, encouraging mutual support, empathy, and personal growth, urging listeners to utilize available resources and take care of themselves and each other. They also mention upcoming episodes on CCA conversion, scheduling, and travel. 1-800-EAP-4YOU - Eap4you.com (USPS & Family)National Suicide and Crisis Lifeline -Call or text 988 for a free, confidential conversation with a trained counselor, 24/7 https://988lifeline.org/Crisis Text Line - Text ACTION to 741741 to be connected to a crisis counselor https://www.crisistextline.org/Samaritans - Preventing suicide and providing hope 877-870-HOPE (4673) https://samaritanshope.org/Veterans Crisis Line - 800-273-TALK (8255) and press 1, Text to 838255 to connect veterans with a trained responder https://www.veteranscrisisline.net/get-help-now/chat/Teen Line - 800-852-8336 Text TEEN to 839863 to connect with highly trained teen listeners The Trevor Project - 866-488-7836 https://www.thetrevorproject.org/ Crisis intervention and suicide prevention for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning young people ages 13-24Institute on Aging's Friendship Line - 800-971-0016 Email friendshipline@ioaging.org Crisis line for people aged 60+ and adults with disabilitiesParent Stress Line - 800-632-8188 https://www.parentshelpingparents.org/stresslineNational Helpline for SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration) - For individuals and families facing mental and/or substance use disorders 800-662-4357 https://findtreatment.gov/MA Substance Abuse Helpline - 800-327-5050 https://helplinema.org/National Alliance on Mental Illness Helpline - 800-370-9085Project Semicolon - https://projectsemicolon.com/Project YES (for teens having trouble accessing services) - https://www.schleiderlab.org/yes.html https://fromatoarbitration.com/ https://fromatoarbitration.com/cca-corner/

Corey expresses his deep affection for the city letter carrier craft and his commitment to advocating for them. He addresses personal attacks he's received due to his outspoken nature, emphasizing that he speaks his mind and does not apologize for it, as his focus is solely on the city letter carrier. Corey revisits his past experiences as an advocate, highlighting his dedication and integrity, and shares stories of both wins and losses in arbitration, stressing the importance of honesty and preparation. He then addresses a number of critical issues impacting carriers, including the perceived incompetence of current union leadership, the detrimental effects of management's "dogs of war" tactics and the arbitrary implementation of metrics like stationary events and hour office time. Corey also discusses the importance of the "dogs of war" concept as a direct response to these issues and outlines plans for addressing the toxic working environment. He announces his upcoming vacation and a return to his usual episode format with a focus on education, including a look at six-day count issues and a review of important legal decisions. Corey stresses the need for a strong, educated union membership and reiterates his dedication to serving the city letter carriers. He also touches on the upcoming election cycle, expressing his confidence in the CLC's chances and the need for continued member engagement. He concludes by emphasizing the importance of self-care and mutual support within the union, offering his personal number for anyone needing to talk. fromatoarbitration.com

In this episode of The Lions' Den, Corey continues his discussion of six-day route counts, providing in-depth instruction on the practical aspects of challenging management actions. This week's session is devoted to reviewing the PS form 1840-B, a critical tool for evaluating street time in route counts. He presents a detailed overview of the form, highlighting the crucial line items and providing a guide on how to recognize and challenge time deductions that could be improperly recorded by management. He stresses the importance of the information found in the actual documentation, detailing various steps that carriers can use for the process. concernedlettercarriers.com

In this extended episode, Corey reacts to his previous week's podcast, with the intent to answer those who have said that he had been unfair in what was said. The episode is a critical analysis of the current state of the NALC and the individuals involved, particularly President Brian Renfroe and Executive Vice President Paul Barner, and the implications of decisions being made and that they have enacted. Corey addresses those, particularly former president, Lew Drass, and expresses that Lew had been "watching from afar" during the past three years. He shares his views on the upcoming election and the importance of unity and a commitment to the well-being of city letter carriers. Corey presents a new challenge to the status quo, calling for a change. fromatoarbitration.com

Corey discusses the upcoming meeting and the key areas management is targeting to take control over the city letter carriers, detailing strategies to combat management's tactics during a six-day route count. Corey then transitions into addressing the importance of documentation for both the city letter carriers and management, with a particular emphasis on form 1838-C and 1840. This episode is a breakdown of the essential elements of a successful route inspection and the importance of the post-inspection week and carrier consultations, and discusses how to best prepare and file a grievance on the basis of any problems and what to look for. concernedlettercarriers.com

In this episode, Corey touches on a variety of topics, beginning with his appreciation for the new name for the Wednesday episodes: The Lions' Den. He then discusses the importance of educating oneself on the rules. He also references the upcoming election and the need for involvement, emphasizing the critical need to vote for leaders who prioritize the interests of city letter carriers. Corey then discusses what happened in the previous episode about the charges from members of branch 70. Corey gets into some points and then the main topic of the episode, LMOU, Local Memorandum of Understanding, by reading the minutes of a management meeting that reveals management's plans. He then reviews a decision from National Arbitrator Mittenthal to reinforce points on how the LMOU should be done. Finally, Corey reinforces the city letter carrier's rights, particularly regarding the upcoming new "autopivot" implementation and the steps involved in handling this new system. He highlights that the carrier can get time back. He also highlights the importance of knowledge of the 3996. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey reviews the importance of 1838C and the critical role that line items 22 and 23 play in determining street waiting time. He continues with handbook EL-801, where he reads through the vehicle safety standards. He discusses the importance of vehicle inspections and the carrier's requirements and responsibilities regarding their vehicle. Next, Corey delves into the core principles of the six-day count, emphasizing the importance of carriers verifying data and, when warranted, requesting form 3996. He stresses the importance of reading and retaining records. Corey details the various areas management will use to try and steal a carrier's time, including travel, and he provides a review of several sections of the M-41 handbook as well as the M-39 handbook. He then goes in and discusses the value of the current union contract. concernedlettercarriers.com

This episode begins with Corey's expression of gratitude to listeners and acknowledges the shift in his podcast format, now under the banner "The Lions' Den," a new name. Before moving on to his discussion of cases, Corey introduces two special guests: Jenna and Stephanie, who are actively involved in efforts to instigate a special convention within the NALC. He then gives a brief rundown on what it means to prepare and when, with a good overview of Robert's Rules of Order. During their interview, Jenna and Stephanie highlight the importance of the upcoming meetings for a special meeting, calling for all branches to send a letter requesting the meeting. The two women's main focus is ensuring that the voices of the membership are heard. Then, the episode proceeds to discuss two particularly valuable arbitration decisions and provides examples of when the union has gone and gotten the city letter carriers back pay. The First Case tackled a "new argument at Step B" situation, where management had introduced a new argument at Step B, and shows the importance of thorough preparation and a strong argument. The Second Case: The second decision focuses on the issue of "hour office time." Corey details the specific circumstances of the case, where management tried to implement a policy of a one-hour office time limit, leading to increased pressure and disciplinary actions against the carriers. The arbitrator ruled in favor of the union, emphasizing that the enforcement of such a policy without proper adherence to the contract violated the agreement and proper time practices. In addition, he discusses the remedy ordered and its impact. He then discussed a few key points from a grievance that could be helpful in any instance. He reviews article one as a base foundation, and violations of section 131 and 41 of the M-41, showing how to request to use the 3996 and how it can be violated. Memos and letters from management are all key for winning in this type of grievance. A main theme is that the union's goal should be a high level of integrity, as well as the importance of, especially in the case of new carriers, knowing what their rights are and not taking what management says at face value. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of The Lions' Den focuses on six-day route counts. Corey starts by discussing the importance of documenting any street-waiting time on the form 1838-C and emphasizes that management is likely to try and manipulate street time. He provides a detailed explanation of various aspects of the M-41 and M-39 handbooks related to package delivery, focusing on the correct procedures to ensure accurate time recording. He stresses the significance of using the 3996 when requesting additional time and highlights the importance of being familiar with the relevant regulations. Corey stresses how to prepare and document the 3996 for the day of a grievance. Corey reads from a decision from arbitration of what the law is and tells the letter carriers the 3996 is what you do for your hours. He says the carriers have to remember who is going to provide an audit trail for management of their DOIS system and what must be entered. The episode emphasizes again that management can not dictate what you do; you have the right to be a part of the process. The episode concludes with a reminder about the ongoing importance of accurate record-keeping in the context of six-day counts and that they should be documenting. www.concernedlettercarriers.com

In this episode of "The CCA Corner," Mallory and Badmouth are joined by James Henry to discuss current issues and provide education for CCAs. The discussion begins with an update on recent events within the NALC, including the contentious tentative agreement (TA), and James Henry's perspective on leadership's handling of the membership's wishes. The focus then shifts to the rights of CCAs during disciplinary investigations (PDIs or IIs), emphasizing the crucial role of union representation. James Henry stresses the importance of CCAs understanding their rights, particularly their right to union representation throughout the entire process, and that management's questions can be seen as attempts to manipulate or trap carriers into incriminating statements. He emphasizes the importance of honesty and direct answers during such procedures. The episode covers the differences in disciplinary rights between CCAs and regular carriers. James Henry details the CLC's efforts to advocate for CCAs and the importance of member solidarity, highlighting recent additions to the team. The discussion touches on the political climate's influence on the Postal Service and the importance of collective action. A significant portion of the episode focuses on the vital role of union representation in defending CCAs, whether they're perceived as innocent or guilty. James Henry emphasizes the importance of upholding due process rights and citing the contract, and how management's attempts to pressure carriers into admitting guilt can be legally challenged. The episode concludes with a discussion of upcoming events and initiatives within the CLC, urging CCAs to be proactive in advocating for their rights. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode features a passionate and critical discussion of the state of the NALC, with a primary focus on a recent executive council meeting. Corey begins by emphasizing that he is now speaking as the CLC's Director of Education, a deliberate shift to focus exclusively on educational topics, and then dives into the core subject of the episode which is a candid discussion about what he perceives as a constitutional crisis within the union. He criticizes Renfroe for his arrogance, which is damaging and divisive. He highlights an audio recording from a business agent, discussing why they dismissed charges against Renfroe and Barner. Corey then reads the text of the actual charges filed against President Renfroe and Executive Vice President Barner, which included allegations of failing to report official acts, neglecting convention resolutions, failing to initiate arbitration timely, bypassing required membership ratification, and failing to provide a complete report of acts. Corey argues that this was a violation of the constitution, and he has strong criticism for the Executive Council, accusing them of putting themselves before the best interests of the members. Corey ends by reiterating his call for the city letter carriers and the union to make changes and support those advocating for reforms. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey focuses on the future of the NALC, particularly with the upcoming change in leadership. He welcomes Rob Kosier, the next director of city delivery for the Concerned Letter Carriers slate, to discuss his priorities and vision for the role. Corey shares his admiration for Kosier's passion, his ability to connect with other letter carriers, and his strong work ethic. Corey highlights what he believes is essential for a director of city delivery: a love for the city letter carrier, a strong backbone, and a no-nonsense attitude. Corey and Rob discuss the value of experience, specifically that experience on the workroom floor, and how, as a director of city delivery, he will use that experience to combat the issues impacting carriers, such as the implementation of autopivot tools and ensuring the accuracy of work time. Corey also addresses the challenges of maintaining and defending the current provisions within the union. Corey also discussed issues of respect and what is needed to address the issues of the postal service. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

In this "Lion's Den" episode, Corey delves into the specifics of six-day mail count inspections, focusing on how to combat potential management manipulation of route adjustments. He details how management might strategically remove routes before a six-day count to reduce their labor costs, and encourages carriers to document every step of this process. Corey emphasizes the importance of meticulous record-keeping, citing specific sections of the USPS handbooks (M39 and M41) as well as past arbitration decisions. He urges listeners to gather evidence showing that management has not conducted the required annual route and unit reviews, as outlined in the handbooks, to demonstrate the potential for unfair adjustments and reduced carrier workload. He lays out the precise steps carriers should take to document instances of alleged mismanagement and overreach during route count inspections, including the careful examination of forms like 1838C, 3999, and 1840 to challenge potentially improper time deductions. Corey's central theme in this episode is the need for detailed documentation and the aggressive pursuit of grievances against management, particularly in cases of improper or incomplete route evaluations, which are critical to the process of a six-day count. He emphasizes the importance of building a collective defense by gathering evidence, and the need for meticulous attention to detail in every step of the six-day count process to ensure management adherence to contract provisions. Corey also discusses the case from Sherry Rose Talmage and its relevance to red line policies. He emphasizes again that letter carriers must be diligent and proactive during route inspections and challenges. http://www.concernedlettercarriers.com/

In this episode, Corey dives deep into the "autopivot" program, a new management tool impacting six-day counts. He details how this program, based on existing USPS systems (DOIS, 3996), potentially violates several articles of the collective bargaining agreement, specifically Article 1, procedural fairness, by pre-populating forms that should be requested by the carrier and filled out on the spot. He argues that management is using this tool to circumvent existing procedures and potentially manipulate carrier workload data. He provides a detailed breakdown of the program's mechanics, highlighting the sections of the M39 and M41 handbooks that he believes are being violated. He emphasizes that the tool, in its present form, allows management to make unilateral decisions concerning workloads and assignments, thus potentially undermining the carrier's rights. The episode further highlights the pervasive pattern of alleged management dishonesty and the union's need to counter these tactics through careful documentation, detailed grievances, and assertive advocacy. Finally, the episode features several shout-outs and announcements about upcoming events and the ongoing campaign by the Concerned Letter Carriers (CLC) slate, reiterating a call for membership unity and active engagement in the 2026 election, emphasizing that the city letter carriers are not going to be subjugated to management tyranny. fromatoarbitration.com

In this episode, the first of a new Wednesday series focused on CLC training, Corey lays out crucial information for letter carriers regarding six-day counts and the proper procedures for handling mail and packages, based on existing union contracts and past arbitration decisions. He emphasizes the importance of understanding and utilizing the specific sections of the USPS handbooks (M39 and M41) and other related documents (EL801, EL804, and M00994) as crucial tools in defending against management attempts to unfairly reduce carrier working time. He details specific procedures for handling various types of mail, including parcels, and the necessity of challenging management's attempts to impose arbitrary time limits or alter established practices, particularly those relating to street time, delivery procedures, and office processing. He highlights the importance of meticulous record-keeping (specifically reviewing forms 1838C, 3999, and 1840, along with carrier time records), challenging time deductions or modifications imposed by management, and utilizing past arbitration precedents to defend against unfair practices. A primary theme is the importance of carriers understanding their rights and how to document instances of management overreach, and the proactive utilization of existing contractual protections for grievance filing. Corey concludes by soliciting suggestions for a more fitting name for the new Wednesday training series. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey is joined by Melissa Rakestraw, David J Grosskopf Jr, Paul Boulanger, Christopher Reed, James Henry, Elliot Simmons, Charlie Miller, Richie Ray, and Mallory Sutton to discuss the recent controversial actions of the NALC leadership, specifically the dismissal of charges against President Renfroe and Executive Vice President Barner without proper investigation. Corey criticizes this decision as a blatant violation of the union's constitution and a dangerous precedent for future grievances. The episode features a panel discussion where several guests provide firsthand accounts of events at the Committee of Presidents (COP) meetings. Melissa Rakestraw recounts being challenged and interrupted by Renfroe when she sought to correct his misrepresentations of the arbitration process, highlighting the lack of respect and accountability demonstrated by Renfroe. Other guests corroborate this account, adding additional details about the disrespectful and inappropriate behavior exhibited by Renfroe during these meetings. The discussion highlights the pervasive pattern of Renfroe's actions, including apparent attempts to suppress dissenting voices and circumvent the constitution's processes. The panel underscores the importance of the constitution as the fundamental guideline for the union, emphasizing the need for investigations and due process in all cases, especially those involving charges against leadership. Corey emphasizes the need for members to actively participate in the upcoming 2026 election, and the importance of selecting leaders who prioritize the membership's will and uphold the NALC constitution. Cites: https://fromatoarbitration.com/episode-233-regulators-mount-up-we-have-a-constitutional-crisis/ http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey discusses the charges filed against President Renfroe and Executive Vice President Barner. He criticizes the actions of the executive council in dismissing these charges without proper investigation, highlighting this as a blatant violation of the union's constitution. Corey argues this represents a dangerous and unprecedented circumvention of the constitution's checks and balances. He foreshadows a detailed analysis of the constitutional crisis facing the NALC in the following day's episode, featuring a panel discussion with various prominent union figures. Corey also provides several shout-outs, including the recognition of a recent arbitration win for a branch president in Kentucky and praise for stewards actively challenging management. He announces a major CLC event, a family outing at the Cleveland Zoo on June 19th, featuring national leadership candidates, and discusses his future podcast schedule, which will alternate between "Salted Peanuts" episodes on Sundays and in-depth educational discussions on Wednesdays. The episode emphasizes the growing concerns within the NALC membership over the leadership's conduct, and their growing distrust of the current administration. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey delivers a farewell message to arbitration, reflecting on his decade-long career as an advocate. He begins by thanking Mallory and Cole for their guest hosting duties and reiterates his commitment to educational content, promising a six-day count training session in the following week's episode. Corey announces a Concerned Letter Carriers (CLC) fundraiser winner's drawing, scheduled for the following day, encouraging listeners to support the CLC. He offers several shout-outs, including specific praise for union members actively supporting their colleagues and addressing issues in smaller branches. A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to a review of a recent arbitration loss, highlighting the importance of honesty and thorough preparation in the process. Corey shares insights into his strategy as an advocate, emphasizing the need for thorough research and preparation, complete memorization of case files, and a relentless pursuit of truth. He reflects on specific cases he's handled, analyzing both wins and losses, and underscores the significance of preparing and presenting compelling arguments, even when faced with management resistance and dishonest or evasive tactics. He stresses the importance of ethical conduct and integrity in arbitration, drawing comparisons between successful and unsuccessful strategies in advocating for members. The episode concludes with a look ahead to the future, outlining his plans as executive vice president to reform the grievance process and address toxic work environments, emphasizing transparency, education, and support for letter carriers nationwide. A recurring theme is the need for a more proactive and forceful approach to unionism, advocating for the needs of city letter carriers and contrasting this with current union leadership failures. Corey ends the episode by reiterating his love for the city letter carriers and his commitment to their well-being. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

In this episode, Mallory and Badmouth welcome Thomas McDonald, Vice President of Branch 1642 in Yuma, Arizona. Thomas discusses the challenges and improvements he's seen in his office, particularly the significant CCA turnover during the COVID-19 pandemic. He highlights efforts to improve communication and address concerns within the CCA workforce, leading to a more positive and productive atmosphere. The discussion transitions to CCA benefits, focusing on health insurance, with a detailed breakdown of the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program and the newly negotiated USPS non-career health benefit plan. This plan, available to CCAs regardless of their appointment year, allows for postal service contributions towards premium costs. The podcast covers eligibility requirements for various benefits, including dental and vision (FEDVIP), flexible spending accounts (FSA), life insurance (through the NALC Mutual Benefit Association—MBA), and death benefits (through the MBA). Specific costs, eligibility requirements, and contact information are provided. Important details regarding uniform allowances, leave policies (annual, sick, bereavement, FMLA, LWOP), and holiday pay are also presented, including details on how to claim uniform allowances and leave benefits. The episode concludes with a call to action for CCAs to get involved in their local union, emphasizing the importance of collective action in advocating for better working conditions and benefits, featuring outreach events in Texas. https://fromatoarbitration.com/cca-corner/

In this episode, Corey discusses the recent Nolan arbitration decision and the ongoing challenges within the NALC, focusing on the actions of the current president, Brian Renfroe. He criticizes Renfroe's handling of contract negotiations, particularly the stipulated arbitration agreement, arguing Renfroe knowingly circumvented the membership's will by agreeing to a predetermined outcome. Corey accuses Renfroe of dishonesty and a lack of concern for members' interests, contrasting this with recent rallies and demonstrations of support by rank-and-file carriers. He advocates for organized resistance to management and a continued push for Renfroe's resignation, detailing how he plans to use this time to further organize and educate, including the establishment of "dogs of war" teams and a more accessible education platform through regular online and in-person training sessions. The episode includes an extended interview with Tyler Vasseur, a prominent member of the Build a Fighting NALC (BFN) group. Vasseur critiques the recent rallies, arguing they were poorly organized and potentially used by Renfroe as a "bait-and-switch" tactic to divert attention from the failing contract negotiations. He emphasizes the need to connect the fight against privatization with demands for a stronger contract and criticizes Renfroe's leadership for failing to effectively represent members' interests. Vasseur outlines BFN's plans for future organizing, including a campaign to win the right to strike and bolster the union's negotiating position. He stresses the importance of grassroots organizing and member involvement to affect meaningful change within the NALC. Corey echoes Vasseur's concerns, highlighting Renfroe's alleged dishonesty and the perceived circumvention of members' will in the arbitration process. He further criticizes the current NALC leadership's apparent disengagement from members' concerns, and details his plans for a more assertive and transparent approach as executive vice president, including grievance procedure reform, educational initiatives, and combating toxic work environments. The episode concludes with a call to action, urging membership engagement and support for a renewed union movement, and the establishment of a strike fund to support potential future action. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com http://www.fightingnalc.com

In this episode of From A to Arbitration, Cole and Mallory, stepping in for Corey, provide a detailed summary of the Nolan arbitration decision. They begin by clarifying that the effective dates for LMOU implementation is from May 27th to June 26th. They then proceed to summarize key changes across various articles, including non-discrimination (adding pregnancy), no layoff provisions (retained), salaries and wages (with increases of 1.3%, 1.4%, and 1.5% and a $1,000 one-time increase for Step P employees), COLAs (retroactive), back pay details, CCA pay adjustments, and modifications to carrier pay tables (eliminating certain steps in Table 2). A significant portion of the discussion focuses on Article 8, detailing changes to work schedules, the right to refuse overtime beyond twelve hours or sixty hours per week without disciplinary action, and the establishment of new overtime designation lists. They also cover the new employee retention and mentoring program (NERP), including provisions for training, initial assignments, and limitations on new employee work locations. The discussion emphasizes practical implementation strategies for members and emphasizes the need for shop stewards and branch presidents to ensure compliance with the new provisions. Cole and Mallory also explain crucial language changes and detail specific considerations for grievances and potential conflicts, emphasizing proactive measures for members to take advantage of new rights and avoid potential abuse of power by management. They also address various questions raised in advance and provide clarifications on important dates and details. A significant theme throughout the episode is the importance of education and proactive strategies for handling the new contract provisions, and the need for vigilance from union members to prevent potential abuses of power from management. https://fromatoarbitration.com/fatas-2023-2026-nalc-national-agreement-guide/ https://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode is a repost of the Next Generation Carriers podcast featuring Corey, along with other letter carriers, in a lengthy discussion about various issues within the National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC), specifically the recent arbitration and the perceived failings of the current leadership. The carriers discuss the low turnout at recent "fight like hell" rallies, attributing this to a perceived lack of effective mobilization strategies from NALC leadership. They criticize the union's handling of the recent contract negotiations, particularly the union president's (Renfroe's) involvement in a stipulated arbitration award that, according to the hosts, was predetermined and didn't reflect the membership's will. Concerns are raised about the potential for Renfroe's actions to negatively impact the union's bargaining position going forward, and calls for his resignation are discussed. The hosts also lament the lack of transparency and communication within the NALC and express the need for a more proactive and aggressive approach to organizing and communication. They discuss the possible implementation of a more extensive education platform to empower and support union members in smaller branches. Further concerns are raised about the use of telematics for disciplinary actions and other workplace issues, with the hosts proposing that these should be grieved at the national level. The conversation also touches on political alliances, emphasizing the need to educate the public about the postal service's role and functions. The carriers encourage their fellow members to remain engaged and unified in the fight for better working conditions and against potential privatization efforts. Several members express frustrations with internal union politics and practices, and a call for systemic changes within the NALC is made. The episode also features the hosts' individual experiences and perspectives within their respective branches. https://www.fromatoarbitration.com/ https://www.nextgenerationcarriers.com/

This is a "CCA Corner" mailbag episode featuring Leo, a newly elected CCA steward from Philadelphia. Badmouth and Mallory begin by apologizing for the infrequent uploads, citing personal life events such as moves. Leo, the guest, shares their background as a practicing attorney before transitioning to a career as a letter carrier. They describe their current work environment as overwhelmingly busy due to handling all Amazon deliveries at their station and frequent changes in management. They explain how their legal background proves advantageous as a steward, drawing parallels between legal practice and handling grievances. Leo recounts how their first day at the academy inspired them to become a steward, discussing the importance of proactive advocacy. They note that they were unexpectedly elected as steward. They then discuss how management's disposition shifted from initially supportive to adversarial after they began actively defending carriers' rights, recounting instances where interviews were abruptly terminated due to disagreements over Weingarten rights. They reflect on the challenges of maintaining composure when facing management resistance and shares their system for managing the large amount of data involved in their steward duties. Leo acknowledges the initial apprehension some carriers felt towards him as a CCA steward but emphasizes that they aimed to gain trust by proactively educating and supporting coworkers. https://fromatoarbitration.com/cca-corner/

In this emergency edition of From A to Arbitration, Corey expresses strong disapproval of the recent stipulated arbitration award, which he believes was a predetermined outcome orchestrated by the union president (Brian Renfroe) and postal management (Doug Tulino). Corey, joined by NALC Vice President James Henry, analyzes the award, highlighting its unusual features, such as a remarkably short timeframe for mediation (only two days) and the arbitrator's apparent acceptance of the union's original rejected tentative agreement (TA). He asserts that the process was a circumvention of the intended arbitration procedure, effectively dismissing the membership's clear rejection of the TA. Corey accuses Renfroe of lying to members and calls for his resignation within 60 days, threatening further action if Renfroe does not comply. He also criticizes the lack of transparency and communication regarding the decision-making process, particularly the lack of involvement of the executive council. Corey and Henry discuss the potential for a future challenge to the award based on procedural irregularities and express their commitment to continuing the fight for better working conditions for letter carriers. They encourage listeners to stay engaged with the union and participate in upcoming events, especially the CLC's national Zoom meeting scheduled for Saturday. The conversation highlights deep disappointment and anger among the membership at the outcome of the negotiations, and the hosts emphasize their continued support for the letter carriers. fromatoarbitration.com

In this episode, Corey discusses several critical issues facing city letter carriers, including management's increasing scrutiny regarding seat belt usage and the use of telematics. He emphasizes that the use of telematics for seat belt monitoring is a new tactic employed by management, and he argues it's a violation of the contract and a breach of procedural due process. Corey highlights multiple points in the National Agreement that he believes management is skirting to justify disciplinary actions against letter carriers, citing arbitrator case studies as precedent for his assertions. He outlines several arguments shop stewards can use to counter these actions, focusing heavily on the principle of corrective, rather than punitive, discipline. Key issues raised include the lack of local management access to telematics data, the perceived weaponization of seat belt policies, and the unilateral imposition of discipline without proper grievance procedures. Corey also addresses the CLC's upcoming campaign activities, including day of action rallies and Congressional outreach, calling for increased union support and engagement. He concludes by promoting a more aggressive and educated approach to responding to management tactics, suggesting the union should be proactive in countering these initiatives. A recurring theme throughout the episode is Corey's belief that current union leadership isn't adequately addressing the issues, and he plans to take a more forceful stance in the future. He also promotes various podcasts and encourages listeners to support the CLC and its efforts. fromatoarbitration.com

This is a profanity-free podcast episode focusing on six-day route count procedures. Corey begins by thanking Mallory and encouraging donations to her. He then updates listeners on the Concerned Letter Carriers (CLC) campaign, highlighting fundraising efforts and emphasizing the need for a completely new slate of officers within the NALC, rejecting those who have not actively supported the city letter carrier craft. He promotes CCA Corner and encourages stewards to inform their CCAs about the podcast. Corey then shares several shout-outs to union members and branches for their activism, announcing upcoming rallies against USPS privatization. He mentions the announcement of Kimetra Simpson-Lewis as the CLC's vice-presidential candidate, praising her leadership and integrity, contrasting her actions with the current NALC president, Brian Renfroe. He expresses excitement about the CLC's upcoming election, describing it as the most aggressive slate ever assembled. Corey then addresses the recent photo of Renfroe with arbitrator Nolan and his attorneys, assuring listeners that resident officers will monitor the arbitration process to ensure Renfroe does not interfere with the legal proceedings. He humorously suggests paying for Renfroe to go on a cruise during the negotiations. He also promotes Brookfield Uniforms, highlighting a special offer for union members. The majority of the episode is dedicated to a detailed explanation of six-day route count procedures, outlining management's obligations regarding consultations with carriers and emphasizing the importance of carrier participation to protect their rights. Corey provides step-by-step guidance on identifying potential issues and filing grievances related to route adjustments, specifically focusing on waiting time, auxiliary assistance credit, and the appropriate use of data from various forms. He concludes by expressing excitement for the future of the NALC under the CLC leadership and reiterates his commitment to supporting city letter carriers. fromatoarbitration.com

Corey begins by stating that he will use profanity in this episode but will not in the following one. He starts by thanking Mallory and encouraging listeners to donate to her through the podcast's website. He then promotes the Concerned Letter Carriers (CLC) campaign, emphasizing the need for fundraising to support the upcoming election and reclaim the union from what he describes as corrupt leadership. Corey discusses the success of the “Dogs of War” initiative, emphasizing its focus on addressing toxic work environments and providing unparalleled training to union members to become more effective in addressing management issues. He then shares numerous shout-outs sent by listeners, recognizing various individuals and branches for their activism and dedication. He reads messages praising specific union members and announces upcoming rallies. A significant portion focuses on the perceived incompetence and dishonesty of the current NALC president, Brian Renfroe, and the lack of support shown to him at a recent regional training event. Corey describes Renfroe's actions as selling out the members and encourages listeners to provide examples of any actions Renfroe has taken to earn their respect. He then addresses concerns about telematics devices in postal vehicles, explaining how shop stewards can effectively handle disciplinary actions related to seatbelt usage by citing relevant regulations. He also analyses a memorandum from the Cleveland Postmaster regarding tour deviations, outlining multiple potential grievances based on contract violations. He discusses several memos detailing performance metrics and argues that these are meant to create a hostile working environment. Corey provides strategies for filing grievances based on these memos, pointing out that the parameters set within them violate the existing collective bargaining agreement. The final section delves into the arrival of Doge representatives, invited by the Postmaster General to identify areas of inefficiency within the USPS. Corey emphasizes that the areas of concern listed by the Postmaster General do not include labor costs, suggesting that the union should focus on these other issues when advocating for improvements. He concludes by reiterating the need to engage with Congress and the public to protect the USPS from privatization and ensure fair treatment of letter carriers. fromatoarbitration.com

The episode begins with Corey giving shout-outs to various individuals and branches of the National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC) for their activism and contributions to the union. He then highlights upcoming rallies against the privatization of the United States Postal Service (USPS), providing details on dates, times, locations, and purposes. A significant portion is dedicated to promoting and explaining "Dogs of War," a new initiative to improve the union's success rate in arbitration cases, citing concerning statistics showing a high loss rate for the union in joint statement cases. David Noble joins the podcast to discuss his ongoing legal battle with the Department of Labor (DOL) regarding the 2022 NALC election. He details four key issues in his appeal, focusing on violations of federal law during the election process, such as inadequate advertising, lack of voter verification, restrictions on observer access, and ballot secrecy violations. He expects a court ruling in May, which could lead to a rerun of the election. Noble also shares his plans for the NALC if elected president, encompassing improvements to the grievance procedure, addressing the CCA issue, enhancing the IT department's analysis of postal service finances, and proposing substantial pay increases for members. The discussion concludes with Corey and Noble agreeing on the failings of the current NALC president, Brian Renfroe, highlighting Renfroe's perceived incompetence and dishonesty in negotiations, and the urgent need for change within the union. fromatoarbitration.com

This episode is a fiery and lengthy discussion, focused on Corey's intense frustration with the union's leadership and management's ongoing violations of the contract. Corey begins by thanking a previous guest and highlighting Mallory's crucial role in maintaining the website and her community engagement. He encourages listeners to support her efforts by utilizing a provided "tip jar" on the website. The episode then delves into Corey's personal experiences with union leadership, particularly a recent instance where his request to conduct training was blocked by a union official. He expresses skepticism about the union's overall strategy and commitment to carrier rights, characterizing their approach as inadequate and reactive. Central to the discussion is Corey's critique of management's practices, particularly the implementation of new metrics and policies that he views as detrimental to carrier safety and well-being, including issues with mandatory overtime, restrictive working conditions, and the alleged falsification of training records (e.g., heat training). He argues that management often circumvents the contract, particularly by using scanner data to enforce non-existent standards. He advocates for challenging these practices through a strategic approach based on past arbitration precedents, demanding clear documentation and evidence to counter management claims. Corey highlights several arbitration cases where management's actions were deemed problematic or dishonest. He emphasizes the importance of understanding how arbitrators interpret issues, particularly regarding the falsification of documents and the concept of "willful misconduct" which can lead to a dismissal or serious punishment. Crucially, Corey emphasizes the need for carriers to be prepared to fight these issues directly, demanding to see documentation and evidence of any alleged violations of the contract. He presents examples of how to phrase such requests to management, even when confronted with attempts to intimidate them, advocating for a robust and detailed strategy for grievances. Corey promotes the "Dogs of War" initiative, a group of individuals who will aggressively challenge management's actions and create a hostile work environment for management on the workroom floor, while also creating a supportive environment for carriers to support each other. He repeatedly emphasizes the importance of unity and proactive engagement from all members of the union to combat these issues. The episode ends with a renewed call for collective action and solidarity, urging listeners to be prepared for ongoing battles and to defend their rights. fromatoarbitration.com

This episode focuses on the concept of "opting" for hold-down assignments for CCA's. Badmouth and Mallory begin by explaining the Joint Contract Administration Manual (JCAM) and its role in interpreting the national agreement. The central topic is the rights and procedures associated with opting, including eligibility requirements (full-time reserves, full-time flexibles, unassigned regulars, and predominantly CCAs). They clarify that opting is for the duration of the assignment, with certain exceptions and stipulations. The discussion includes the limitations on who can opt and specific circumstances when management may interfere with a hold-down assignment. Badmouth and Mallory also emphasize the importance of the correct use of the grievance procedure in these cases. The episode stresses the value of "holding down" a route for CCAs in terms of gaining valuable experience, building a clearer understanding of the route and procedures, and establishing a more predictable schedule. This is presented as a tool to reduce the unpredictable on-call status often faced by CCAs. The conversation includes the distinction between "clean bumps" (contractually permissible) and "dirty bumps" (grievable). Badmouth and Mallory provide examples of each type of bump, emphasizing that CCAs should be aware of their rights and should quickly engage their union steward to file grievances in the event of an unfair bump. They strongly advocate for the use of "malicious compliance" in a strategic, petty way to challenge management actions in these situations while still maintaining proper procedure within the contractual framework. Badmouth and Mallory advocate for active union involvement and encourage listeners to join orgs and movements working for improved working conditions, including open bargaining, fair compensation, and a safer work environment for all carriers. They provide links to relevant organizations. Finally, the episode stresses solidarity and support within the carrier community, encouraging listeners to reach out and support each other during challenging times. The episode ends on a note of hope and solidarity, reminding listeners that the union will fight to protect their rights. https://fromatoarbitration.com/cca-corner/ https://www.fightingnalc.com/ https://concernedlettercarriers.com/

This episode is an extended discussion, featuring multiple guests, on the upcoming arbitration proceedings and the broader context of the potential threat to the USPS. James Henry emphasizes unity and solidarity among NALC members, regardless of branch or political affiliation, in response to perceived threats to the postal service, particularly the potential for privatization and the removal of the Postal Board of Governors. He stresses the need for collective action and cautions against internal division, urging listeners to support upcoming rallies and the planned "lunchtime call-in" day of action to pressure congressional representatives. Richie Ray addresses concerns about the expedited arbitration process, leadership, and the toxic work environment, advocating for a proactive, rather than reactive, approach. He emphasizes the need for education and transparency within the union. He also outlines his vision for Region 15 as business agent, focused on the grievance procedure, and the importance of empowering the rank and file. Corey concludes the episode with his perspective, calling for unity and collective action among all postal employees to defend the USPS, offering advice on addressing the concerns raised and strategies to be used, along with plans to mobilize teams to combat hostile working environments. The overarching theme is the need for solidarity and collective action amongst all members of the postal service in the face of perceived threats to the postal service, including potential privatization. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode features a discussion about expedited arbitration, focusing on concerns raised by members regarding the process. Charlie Miller, a seasoned union representative, addresses these concerns, explaining the expedited arbitration process and emphasizing the importance of understanding the potential risks and benefits. He highlights the lack of transparency in expedited proceedings, contrasting them with traditional arbitration. Charlie also discusses the larger context of the USPS's potential dismantling, linking it to ideological issues and arguing it is a significant threat to the union's members' livelihoods and the broader economy. Charlie and Corey critique the NALC president's handling of negotiations and the union's current leadership, pointing out missed opportunities and the lack of empathy displayed towards rank-and-file members. He strongly advocates for a proactive approach, urging listeners to participate in a mass phone call campaign to directly influence their congressional representatives. The episode stresses the need for solidarity and collective action to preserve the postal service. The discussion underscores the importance of understanding the political context of the dispute and the need for continued, widespread member involvement. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode discusses the upcoming arbitration proceedings between the NALC and the USPS. Corey expresses deep dissatisfaction with the NALC president's handling of negotiations, criticizing the low offer (1.3%) received after over six hundred days of talks. Corey believes Renfroe failed to negotiate effectively and believes the offer was intentionally timed to force arbitration. He recounts the history of the dispute, emphasizing past arbitration failures, and the union's decision to proceed to interest arbitration. He also highlights a recent case where an arbitrator ruled against management and the subsequent efforts to amend that ruling. Corey argues that the union has a strong position to win concessions in arbitration due to the evidence gathered and the need for the members' voices to be heard. This episode also includes a detailed summary of the interest arbitration process, referencing previous cases and emphasizing that this is a complex and time-consuming procedure. Corey's overall message conveys a strong sense of frustration with the union's current leadership and a determination to fight for fair compensation in the upcoming arbitration. He concludes by expressing confidence in the carrier's determination to achieve a positive outcome. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of the CCA Corner podcast features an interview with Emily, a newly converted PTF (previously CCA) from Cincinnati. The discussion focuses on union involvement and the importance of CCAs attending branch meetings. Emily shares her experience successfully passing a resolution for a "no" vote on the recent tentative agreement (TA) at her branch. She emphasizes that despite personally benefiting from the TA, she voted no due to its inadequate address of CCA issues, particularly the low starting wage. Her branch unanimously supported the no vote and publicized their decision. Emily encourages CCAs to attend meetings, emphasizing the free food and drinks, the opportunity to meet union officers, and the importance of CCA voices in shaping the future of the union. She highlights the generally welcoming atmosphere of meetings and the need for solidarity and support among CCAs. Morris reiterates the importance of attending meetings, even if seemingly unproductive, to ask questions and hold leadership accountable. He also promotes Building a Fighting NALC and the CLC as avenues for further union involvement. The episode concludes with thanks to Emily and a call for solidarity and self-care. https://fromatoarbitration.com/cca-corner/

This episode focuses on the detrimental actions of current NALC leadership, specifically President Brian Renfroe and Executive Vice President Paul Barner, and contrasts their behavior with the proactive, carrier-focused approach of the Concerned Letter Carriers (CLC). Corey details the CLC's recent training efforts, emphasizing their commitment to educating members and preparing them for future leadership roles. He criticizes Renfroe and Barner for their opposition to grievances and arbitrations, which he views as essential tools for protecting carriers' rights and securing financial remedies. He alleges that Renfroe is collaborating with management to reduce fixed office time, undermining carriers' efforts to combat the imposed one-hour office time metric. Corey highlights a template created by a business agent to fight the one-hour office time mandate. This template includes grievance language addressing violations of the national agreement, handbooks, and memorandums. It also emphasizes the importance of carrier statements to document the toxic work environment created by this policy. However, Corey expresses frustration that Renfroe is simultaneously negotiating to reduce fixed office time, rendering the template less effective. He further criticizes Renfroe for failing to inform carriers about upcoming street observations by a headquarters safety team, as detailed in a letter sent to Renfroe in December. This lack of communication is compared to a betrayal, leaving carriers vulnerable to disciplinary action. Corey also condemns Renfroe's apparent lack of concern for a murdered carrier, focusing instead on James Henry's presence at a memorial event. He criticizes Renfroe for relying on prepared statements and lacking genuine passion. The episode concludes with a discussion of a successful arbitration case where management was ordered to pay the arbitrator's full fees due to non-compliance with a Step B decision. The arbitrator cited USPS Policy Letter M-01517, establishing that compliance is not optional. However, Corey reveals that Barner, under pressure from national labor, convinced the arbitrator to amend the award and split the fees, a move Corey considers a major setback in the fight against non-compliance. He urges carriers to support the CLC in the upcoming election to oust the current leadership and restore a carrier-focused approach to union representation. He also promotes a uniform discount offered by a carrier-friendly vendor. Cites: https://fromatoarbitration.com/episodes-201-300/ http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode delves into the intricacies of the six-day count process, focusing on management's review requirements after route adjustments and the importance of meticulous form review to prevent manipulation of carrier time. Corey emphasizes the necessity of filing grievances if management fails to review routes or make necessary adjustments after an initial adjustment. He advises waiting 60-75 days post-adjustment to file, allowing carriers time to acclimate to the route and gather strong evidence of overburdening. This strategy also counters management's argument that carriers are simply unfamiliar with the route. The episode then meticulously details sections 243.6 and 243.7 of the M-39 handbook, outlining management's responsibilities for reviewing routes, completing necessary forms (3997, 3999, 1813), examining time records for excessive overtime or auxiliary assistance, and ultimately readjusting routes if found to be out of adjustment. Corey underscores the importance of accurate data entry, highlighting a recent arbitration case where management was found to have falsified time records, and pledges to address such falsification head-on when he becomes Director of City Delivery. Corey then transitions into a detailed explanation of various forms used in the six-day count process, including the 1840B, 1838C, and 1838. He explains how to interpret the data on these forms, emphasizing potential areas where management might manipulate figures to steal carrier time. He notes the importance of verifying entries for auxiliary street time, excluded time, and mail volume. The analysis of form 1838C emphasizes the need to scrutinize line items to ensure carriers receive appropriate credit for all performed duties. Corey gives examples of how management might misclassify recurring tasks as non-recurring (line 22 instead of 21) to deny carriers credit for their time. He stresses the importance of carrier and steward vigilance in reviewing these forms and requesting interviews with carriers to verify information accuracy. Finally, Corey discusses form 1838, highlighting how waiting street time is frequently manipulated to underreport actual street time. He warns against unexplained deductions in street time and advises investigating any discrepancies through interviews, form reviews, and employee testimony. He concludes by reiterating the importance of scrutinizing these forms, as management is often trained to find ways to steal time from carriers. He then briefly mentions an upcoming CLC training session and promises a future episode covering other listener-submitted topics. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode features an interview with Tyler Vasseur, a leader of the Build a Fighting NALC (BFN) movement. The discussion focuses on the successful "Vote No" campaign against the recent tentative agreement, the NALC leadership's response, and BFN's plans for the future. Corey begins by praising BFN's efforts and highlighting Mallory's call for members to submit educational resources to the From A to Arbitration website. He then introduces Tyler, commending his courage and leadership. Tyler discusses the historic nature of the TA rejection, emphasizing the increased voter turnout and the parallels to a similar rejection in 1978. He attributes the "no" vote to inflation, anger at NALC leadership, and the organized efforts of the reform movement. He stresses the importance of making the union a real force in the workplace to increase membership participation. Corey and Tyler criticize President Renfroe's handling of negotiations, particularly his broken promises and lack of transparency. They see his recent adoption of BFN's talking points, including calls for an all-career workforce and a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), as an attempt to save face. Tyler, however, views this as a victory for the reform movement, demonstrating the effectiveness of pressure and organized demands. He calls for nationally coordinated contract rallies to maintain momentum. Tyler outlines BFN's plans for the future, including a campaign for the right to strike. He encourages listeners to join the upcoming BFN Zoom meeting and details how to start a local chapter. He emphasizes the importance of organizing and building a strong foundation for future fights, including the national convention, leadership elections, and contract negotiations in 2026. Corey reiterates his support for BFN and offers to promote their events. Contact Mallory: mallory@fromatoarbitration.com http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/contact http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/ https://www.fightingnalc.com/ https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/oL-uZSHURhuzHlKGDL-3eA#/registration

This episode of the CCA Corner features an interview with James Henry, the current NALC Vice President and presidential nominee for the CLC ticket in the 2026 election. The discussion centers around Henry's background, the CLC's platform, and their plans to address concerns relevant to City Carrier Assistants (CCAs). Henry details his extensive union experience, starting as a shop steward and rising through the ranks to National Vice President, emphasizing his commitment to member education and advocacy. He outlines the NALC's structure, from the national president down to the local branch level, and criticizes the current leadership for a lack of accountability and transparency. He also expresses frustration with having his duties reassigned by the current president. The conversation turns to the CLC's platform, highlighting their focus on transparency, principled contract negotiations, member education, and empowering CCAs. Henry advocates for standardizing training and opportunities across all NALC regions, emphasizing the need for consistent standards and mentorship for CCAs. He addresses concerns about the current lack of transparency within the NALC, promising more open communication and information sharing with the membership. Henry discusses the CLC's commitment to improving the CCA position, advocating for better wages, working conditions, and career advancement opportunities. He also expresses his long-term goal of abolishing the CCA position altogether in favor of an all-career workforce. Finally, he stresses the importance of solidarity, both within the NALC and with other labor organizations, emphasizing the need for a unified front to advocate for workers' rights. He closes by encouraging CCAs to stay involved and unified, assuring them that the CLC and other NALC activists are fighting for their interests. https://fromatoarbitration.com/cca-corner/ https://concernedlettercarriers.com/

This episode focuses on the current state of the NALC, criticizing President Brian Renfroe's leadership and the recently rejected tentative agreement. Corey argues that Renfroe's statements about getting every possible penny from negotiations undermined the union's position and led to a poor agreement. He expresses anger over the low pay raise, the continued existence of CCAs, and other unfavorable terms, accusing Renfreo, Tulino, and DeJoy of "stealing" from letter carriers. He praises the membership for overwhelmingly rejecting the TA, viewing it as a sign of a grassroots uprising against incompetent leadership. Corey emphasizes the need for the union to be a "consequence" for management's abuses, using an anecdote about protecting an inmate in jail to illustrate the role of union representatives. He criticizes management's use of 1767s and other tactics as forms of harassment and calls for stronger pushback. He details specific strategies for challenging 1767s, including referencing relevant M-numbers and requesting interviews with all involved management personnel. He advocates for aggressive grievance filing and using tactics like filing quarterly overtime grievances nationwide to pressure management. Corey also discusses the upcoming NALC elections, expressing confidence in the CLC ticket's victory and his own future role as Director of City Delivery. He acknowledges the division within the union but believes it will resolve itself with the removal of Renfroe and his allies. He ends by thanking his listeners and promising to fight for their interests. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Two episodes are previewed: one with James Henry discussing the rejected NALC/USPS tentative agreement (TA), and another covering various topics like a retirement dinner and grievance payouts. Corey thanks his helpers for fixing his tech issues, enabling him to address a message backlog. He praises Henry's integrity and anticipates a strong discussion about the TA rejection, which Henry interprets as a clear message for better terms regarding workforce, hours, and pay. Henry argues letter carriers deserve top industry compensation due to their unique demands and stresses the need for a contract addressing both economic and work rule concerns. He outlines the next steps, including renegotiations and potential arbitration, advocating for a full TA review and greater officer involvement. The conversation shifts to negotiation strategy concerns, with Corey and Henry discussing rumors of leadership potentially agreeing to non-pay TA items before focusing solely on pay. Henry insists everything should be renegotiated. They discuss the upcoming "day of action," with Henry encouraging participation and unity against the USPS. Corey questions President Renfroe's planned appearance, given his previous TA support. Both emphasize trustworthiness in leadership, with Henry affirming his commitment to honesty and advocating for fair treatment of all letter carriers. www.fromatoarbitration.com https://concernedlettercarriers.com/

Corey celebrates the city letter carriers' overwhelming rejection of the proposed tentative agreement with the United States Postal Service. He frames this as a historic moment, a declaration of war against both the Postal Service and their own union leadership, particularly President Brian Renfroe. Corey accuses Renfroe of being a "failed leader," "reckless," "clueless," and a "danger" to the union. He criticizes Renfroe for initially praising the TA as "historic" and the "best offer" while later shifting the narrative to claim the Postal Service made the offer. He highlights the grassroots uprising against the TA, emphasizing the disrespect shown to the city letter carriers by both the Postal Service and the union leadership. Corey claims the TA was full of "concessions" and "cowardice," and that Renfroe lied about its contents. He sees the TA rejection as a sign that the CLC will take back control of the union in the 2026 elections and that Renfroe and his supporters will be ousted. He emphasizes the CLC's power and unity, expressing immense pride in their actions and promising to continue fighting for their interests, even if it means going to arbitration. He contrasts the current situation, where the Postal Service and union leadership are "eating steak," with his vision of the future, where the city letter carriers will also "fight for steak." He reiterates his unwavering support for the CLC and his determination to continue advocating for them. www.fromatoarbitration.com

This episode of the CCA Corner podcast features an interview with Gus, an OJI trainer and academy instructor in Boston. Gus emphasizes that new CCAs often overstress about memorizing the case at the academy. Instead, he recommends focusing on learning the process of casing mail efficiently, such as starting with bundled flats, then larger flats, and finally letters. He also highlights the regional variations in postal terminology and encourages new hires to ask questions and not compare themselves to experienced carriers. Gus stresses the importance of taking each delivery one at a time, prioritizing accuracy and safety over speed. He reassures listeners that it's okay to ask questions, even after training, and encourages more experienced carriers to mentor newer colleagues. https://fromatoarbitration.com/cca-corner/

Corey provides a link to his recent in-depth interview with Ron Speakman. He emphasizes the importance of honesty and transparency in his own commentary and discusses the ongoing challenges facing letter carriers.The episode features:Shoutouts: Recognition for dedicated union stewards, educators, and organizers.Fundraising Announcements: Information on upcoming fundraisers, including a bowl-a-thon for MDA and a scholarship fundraiser.James Henry's Response to California Wildfires: Corey praises James Henry's proactive response to the California wildfires, highlighting his on-the-ground support for affected carriers and his advocacy for improved working conditions.Discipline Analysis: A deep dive into a sample disciplinary notice, focusing on identifying potential weaknesses in the investigation and challenging the validity of the charges.Addressing Recent Controversy: Corey clarifies his stance on a recent disagreement with Mike Carref, emphasizing the importance of focusing on the issues and avoiding unnecessary conflict.

In this episode, we sit down with Alan Gegax, from Classes of Mail. The interview discusses the treatment of City Carrier Assistants (CCAs), and the perception of CCA treatment from the East Coast. Gegax argues that CCAs are often mistreated by management and that the union does not do enough to protect them. He also discusses the importance of education and empowerment for CCAs. This comprehensive discussion gives a unique perspective toward perception of the CCA position, the union itself, and handbook provisions that receive little attention. https://fromatoarbitration.com/cca-corner/ https://fromatoarbitration.com/postal-podcasts/

This episode of CCA Corner provides a comprehensive guide for new City Carrier Assistants (CCAs) navigating their first 90 days at the post office. It covers both office and street procedures, emphasizing safety, accuracy, and the importance of union membership, and includes a guest feature from Richie Ray, host of Hot House with Richie Ray. Office Procedures: We discuss the initial stress of the office environment, dealing with management, and the varying helpfulness of colleagues. It highlights the importance of On-the-Job Instructors (OJIs) as resources. Street Procedures: We cover details of the three main types of mail delivery: Park and Loops: Parking the truck and walking a street. Emphasizing proper parking procedures ("curb it, park it, break it, take it"), carrying the satchel correctly, and using dog spray. Dismounts: Short stops at individual addresses, with similar safety precautions. Mounted Boxes: Delivering mail from the vehicle, stressing the importance of placing the vehicle in neutral or park at each box. Some additional tidbits we cover include: Safety First: Checking the vehicle for safety issues and reporting them is paramount. Carriers have the right to refuse unsafe work. No Mistake Pace: Prioritize accuracy and safety over speed. Speed will develop with experience. Forming Good Habits: Establishing proper procedures from day one is crucial for long-term success. Union Importance: Joining the union is strongly recommended, for protection and advocacy. Stewards are available to answer questions and help with issues. Schedule Awareness: CCAs should check their schedule daily, as it can change. They are entitled to a minimum number of work hours if scheduled. https://fromatoarbitration.com/cca-corner/ https://fromatoarbitration.com/postal-podcasts/

This episode discusses the ongoing conflict between city letter carriers and postal service management, focusing on management's manipulation of clock rings to falsely reduce recorded office time. Corey criticizes Renfroe for his inaction and perceived complicity with management, endorsing James Henry as the next president. Corey details a specific arbitration case where management falsified over 480 hours of clock ring data, highlighting management's dishonesty and the union's struggle to hold them accountable. He emphasizes the need for stronger union leadership under the Concerned Letter Carriers (CLC) to combat management abuses, particularly concerning the joint statement on harassment and the falsification of time records, advocating for escalated monetary awards and holding upper management accountable. Corey also promotes upcoming CLC educational initiatives, including a new podcast and YouTube channel, and encourages listeners to support the CLC and MDA through merchandise sales. Finally, he recounts instances of management attempting to influence arbitration decisions, emphasizing their unethical tactics and reinforcing the need for a more assertive union. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a "hodgepodge" of information: Corey provides updates on the upcoming release of his episode of Fed Up, and the increasingly popular CCA Corner. He then covers several topics: shout-outs to union leaders Ivan Butts (NAPS) and Chris Kelly (former NALC Branch 459); an email from management emphasizing safety and outlining disciplinary actions for distracted driving, which Corey criticizes as punitive rather than corrective, which violates contract language; a disciplinary action against a carrier for taking excessive breaks, which Corey argues is flawed due to reliance on GPS data alone and the inclusion of an official discussion, thus violating article 16.2; and finally, a closing argument from an arbitration case (C-35201) focusing on a violation of article 10.19 (sick leave) and article 15 (noncompliance). Corey highlights management's consistent failure to provide requested information, emphasizing the intentional nature of this noncompliance and its impact on grievance resolutions. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

In this episode of the CCA Corner, Badmouth and Mallory discuss the recent increase in "safety blitzes" conducted by management. We break down common violations, delve into the M-41 handbook for safe driving procedures, and provide essential tips for staying safe and avoiding disciplinary action. In this episode: • Understanding Safety Blitzes: Learn how management is observing carriers and what they're looking for. • M-41 Mastery: We explore key sections of the M-41 manual, including safe driving practices, vehicle operation, and handling mail. • Building Good Habits: Develop essential habits for safe and efficient route delivery. • Weingarten Rights: Understand your rights to union representation during any investigatory interview. • Staying Safe: Learn how to respond if you feel you're being followed or if you're questioned by management. Join us as we equip you with the knowledge and confidence to navigate the challenges of being a CCA and thrive on your route. https://fromatoarbitration.com/cca-corner/

Guest David Noble discusses the flaws in the recently negotiated tentative agreement (TA), arguing that President Renfroe's use of statistics is misleading and that he failed to account for the $3,369 loss in purchasing power since the last contract. Noble explains the three ways letter carriers receive pay increases (general wage increases, cost of living allowances, and step increases), highlighting how the TA fails to adequately address inflation, particularly for CCAs who receive no step increases. He criticizes the delayed release of the TA's language and the inclusion of a ballot identification number violating federal law. Noble details the significant changes to overtime rules in the TA, which were not disclosed in the summary provided by Renfroe, and expresses concern about the significant ballot mailing issues preventing many members from voting. He also emphasizes the critical need to address the crippling backlog of grievances pending arbitration, advocating for the addition of more arbitrators to expedite the process and ensure fair contract enforcement, contrasting the current union's focus on finances over addressing carrier issues. He concludes by suggesting that Renfroe's actions indicate a bias towards management rather than letter carriers. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of "From A to Arbitration" is a shorter episode due to a scheduling conflict, featuring updates on upcoming appearances on other podcasts and a tribute to retiring NALC member AJ Breaux. Corey discusses the ongoing vote on the tentative agreement, expressing strong disapproval and criticizing the current NALC leadership's dishonesty. He encourages a "no" vote, emphasizing the importance of fighting for better conditions despite the risks of arbitration. The episode includes shout-outs to several stewards and branch presidents for their strong advocacy and concludes with a heartfelt tribute to AJ Breaux, highlighting his expertise, dedication, and significant contributions to the NALC. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of "From A to Arbitration" features James Henry and various members of the Concerned Letter Carriers (CLC) slate advocating for a "no" vote on the proposed tentative agreement, citing its inadequacy in addressing letter carriers' needs. CLC members detail their backgrounds and reasons for supporting Henry's candidacy in the 2026 NALC election, emphasizing his integrity, arbitration expertise, and commitment to fighting for better wages, working conditions, and union reform. The discussion highlights concerns about the current NALC leadership and encourages listeners to actively participate in the upcoming vote and support the CLC's efforts.http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/ http://www.concernedlettercarriers.com/

This episode of "From A to Arbitration" discusses the ongoing issue of 16.7 violations, emphasizing the need for business agents to provide guidance to their members and highlighting management's tactics for targeting letter carriers. Corey analyzes a document outlining management's safety initiative, which he criticizes for its potential to be weaponized against carriers and for its failure to address the inherent problems of a toxic work environment created by management. He strongly advises carriers to request a steward immediately if approached by management during street observations and emphasizes that any evidence collected before the steward's arrival should be considered inadmissible. Corey also discusses the pressure the postal service is under, specifically mentioning the potential for privatization, and advocates for using public outreach to exert pressure on the postal service and Congress. Corey expresses strong disapproval of the tentative agreement and the current NALC administration's response, praising the work of the CLC and anticipating a significant win in the 2026 election. He concludes by announcing plans for a YouTube channel and weekly CLC podcasts focusing on basic union training. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This emergency episode of From A to Arbitration features Charlie Miller discussing the newly released tentative agreement (TA). Miller, citing his extensive arbitration experience, analyzes several key provisions, highlighting problematic language in article 8 regarding overtime limits, noting that the 12-hour/60-hour protections apply only to full-time employees not on overtime or work assignment lists, contradicting earlier statements by President Renfroe. He critiques the poorly constructed language regarding overtime pay (2.5 times the rate), arguing it incentivizes short staffing and fails to address the root cause of the issue—inadequate wages. Miller expresses concern about the two-tiered overtime system created by the TA and the new language in article 8 section 5(c) requiring weekly posting of the overtime desired list to ensure equitability, which he believes shifts undue burden to the union. He further criticizes the reduction in fixed office time (from 33 to 20 minutes) and the lack of improvements to working conditions, noncompliance issues, and the toxic work environment. Discussion includes the flawed article 17 language concerning dues processing, where the union now bears responsibility for defending and indemnifying the postal service. The conversation touches on the inadequate pay for CCAs and the lack of a unified COLA, and the failure to address the issue of route adjustments via a non-grievable alternate dispute resolution process. Finally, they discuss the potential for abuse of article 16.7 (emergency placements) and the lack of recourse against managerial abuse. The episode concludes with a call for union unity and a renewed commitment to fighting for fair wages and working conditions. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This introductory episode of CCA Corner features Badmouth Morris advocating for CCA organization and empowerment. He criticizes the current tentative agreement (TA) for neglecting CCAs and calls for their mobilization, particularly in the upcoming election. Morris stresses the importance of education and empowerment, aiming to provide digestible information about rights, union processes, and grievance procedures for newer CCAs. He highlights the need for solidarity between CCAs and regular carriers, emphasizing that change comes from the bottom up and that a unified front is crucial for challenging management and improving working conditions. Morris encourages mentorship and support for CCAs, urging experienced carriers to share knowledge and offer encouragement. Future episodes will address topics like surviving the first 90 days, common grievances, Weingarten rights, and escaping de facto on-call status, with topics crowdsourced from CCAs nationwide.https://fromatoarbitration.com/cca-corner/

This lengthy episode of "From A to Arbitration" announces Corey's acceptance of the position of Director of City Delivery on the CLC ticket, emphasizing his commitment to aggressively addressing management's harmful actions against letter carriers. He details his plans for a transparent administration, including weekly national Zoom meetings, and promises a strong CLC ticket for the 2026 election. The episode analyzes a recent arbitration decision from Region 3 that criticized the union's use of escalated monetary awards for noncompliance, highlighting the subsequent cowardly response from some business agent offices. Corey counters this response by providing examples from prior arbitration awards supporting the use of such remedies and outlines strategies for effectively addressing this issue in future cases. He then dissects a national management directive detailing procedures for emergency placements of letter carriers based on safety violations (unattended vehicles, seatbelts, distracted driving, etc.), outlining how to challenge these actions based on procedural flaws (lack of investigation, lack of formal charges, removal of supervisor authority) with supporting arbitration precedent. The episode concludes with a strong declaration of commitment to fighting for the city letter carrier and a preview of a segment featuring Badmouth Morris on the CCA Corner.Cites: C-06012, C-29546, C-01944, C-24822, C-35382, C-35537 A-B, M-01967 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on strategies for challenging disciplinary actions based solely on the charges issued, without relying on additional information. Corey announces upcoming Sunday episodes, including a new segment, "CCA Corner," hosted by Badmouth Morris, aimed at uniting and empowering CCAs to combat their neglect by the current NALC administration. He emphasizes the critical importance of meticulously reviewing disciplinary charges for inaccuracies and inconsistencies, citing several arbitration cases (Sims C-36248, Schedler C-01233, Brooks C-28040) that support challenging vaguely worded or factually incorrect charges. The host then analyzes three disciplinary actions: a 7-day suspension for improper conduct and failure to follow instructions, where he highlights the fast-tracking of discipline and the lack of specificity in the cited ELM sections; a 14-day suspension for improper conduct and unsafe driving, where he points out inconsistencies in the stated awareness of ELM provisions and the lack of a connection between the actions and the charges; and a letter of warning for failure to follow instructions regarding an SPM scan, where he argues that the charge is based solely on scanner data (violating M-01458) and the cited regulations do not apply. He uses arbitrator Snow's decision (C-06894) to emphasize the importance of allowing time for reflection between disciplinary actions, highlighting the inappropriateness of issuing a 7-day and a 14-day suspension for the same offense on the same day. Throughout the episode, Corey stresses the importance of requesting "any and all information" used in issuing the discipline and using this information to expose inaccuracies and inconsistencies in the charges themselves, ultimately aiming to defeat disciplinary actions based on the flawed charges provided by management. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode features several members of the Concerned Letter Carriers (CLC) introducing themselves and explaining their reasons for joining the movement. Corey announces a future episode featuring a roundtable discussion with CLC members and previews an upcoming episode focusing on strategies for dealing with narcissistic individuals. Ethel Bibbs, president of Branch 842 in Beaumont, Texas, discusses the challenges faced by letter carriers and the need for a more assertive approach to contract negotiations, emphasizing the importance of unity within the CLC. Kamitra Lewis, president of Branch 132 in Dallas, Texas, shares her friendship with James Henry and highlights their shared commitment to fighting for letter carriers' rights. She expresses gratitude for the host's support following the death of Eugene Gates and emphasizes the CLC's focus on ensuring that the needs of all letter carriers are addressed. Rob Cozier, branch president of Branch 2902 in Tri-Valley, California, shares his personal journey within the union and the inspiration he found in Tyler Vassar's work with BFN, and he discusses the successful contract rally in Pasadena, highlighting the importance of member mobilization and collective action. Walt McGregor, president of Branch 2184 in Southeast Michigan, discusses his extensive experience within the NALC and his reasons for supporting the CLC, particularly emphasizing his commitment to member empowerment and accountability. He highlights the pervasive "good old boy" network within his region and the need for greater transparency and fairness within the union. John Crews, president of Branch 41 in Brooklyn, New York, recounts a situation where James Henry's leadership in advocating for a member outside of his own branch influenced his decision to join the CLC. He stresses the importance of unity and emphasizes his commitment to working with the CLC to bring positive change to the NALC. Howard Komeini, branch president of branch 860 in Honolulu, Hawaii, shares his personal story, highlighting his dedication to representing and defending letter carriers against management abuses. He expresses his support for the CLC and his commitment to fighting for a better contract that reflects the value and importance of letter carriers' work.Corey then summarizes the CLC's message: a commitment to unity, transparency, and fighting for the rights and well-being of all letter carriers. He emphasizes that the CLC is a nationwide movement, not just a California-based one. He praises the CLC members' dedication, passion, and integrity and expresses his excitement about their plans for reforming the NALC. The episode concludes with announcements about upcoming podcast episodes and a call for continued member engagement and support for the CLC. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/ https://concernedlettercarriers.com/

This episode addresses the ongoing fallout from the tentative agreement, focusing on the need for a more militant union response and providing further education on 6-day counts. Corey begins with listener shout-outs and promotes several relevant podcasts, highlighting the growing number of resources available to letter carriers. He then clarifies an issue with his email inbox and announces a new monthly podcast segment dedicated to CCA concerns. Corey expresses his strong dissatisfaction with the tentative agreement, characterizing it as a major concession to management and emphasizing that many members are considering leaving the union due to their frustration. He then discusses the upcoming CLC "Vote No" Zoom meeting and encourages members to participate. He strongly criticizes those who are attempting to downplay the negative aspects of the agreement and those who are promoting a “vote yes” position based on fear-mongering tactics. He emphasizes that the union's failure to address key issues like non-compliance and toxic work environments is a result of the current leadership's incompetence and lack of commitment to the city letter carriers. He uses a listener's comment illustrating this indifference, highlighting the callousness of a response that suggests harassment can be avoided simply by showing up for work and doing one's job. Corey shares several examples of management's increasingly aggressive tactics to pressure carriers, including threats of discipline, the imposition of unrealistic time constraints, and the use of scanner data for monitoring and control. He provides specific examples and strategies for countering these tactics through grievances, emphasizing the need to challenge management's attempts to manipulate data and impose arbitrary standards. He also emphasizes the importance of using the route consultation to challenge management's decisions and to obtain all the necessary documentation to build strong grievance cases. Corey dedicates a section of the episode to explaining how to deal with chronic liars and narcissists, using specific examples from his arbitration experience. He highlights the importance of gathering evidence to expose their dishonesty and using that evidence to challenge their claims and discredit their testimony. He then provides a detailed analysis of the handling of the Article 10 charges against President Renfroe, highlighting Renfroe's dishonesty and lack of remorse. He emphasizes that the current leadership has failed to adequately represent the interests of letter carriers and that the upcoming election presents a crucial opportunity to effect change within the NALC. He urges members to actively participate in the vote-no campaign and to support the CLC's efforts to elect new leadership that will prioritize the needs of the city letter carriers. The episode concludes with additional shout-outs and a call for greater member education and engagement. Corey reiterates his commitment to fighting for the city letter carriers and expresses his excitement about the upcoming changes within the NALC. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode continues the educational series on 6-day counts, focusing on the procedures and regulations outlined in the 2018 NALC Route Inspection Pocket Handbook. Corey begins with listener shout-outs, promoting a vote-no rally and the "Tallest Nail" podcast. He then addresses issues with his email inbox, explaining that he is working to catch up on unanswered emails. He announces a new monthly podcast segment dedicated to CCA issues and promotes several other relevant podcasts. The bulk of the episode involves a detailed explanation of the route inspection process, covering various aspects from preparation through consultation and adjustment. The host emphasizes the importance of meticulous record-keeping, accurate time recording, and assertive advocacy in challenging management's actions, providing specific guidance on completing the necessary forms (1838c, 1840, 3999) and highlighting specific areas where management often attempts to manipulate data or impose arbitrary time limits. He details the importance of the carrier consultation and urges active participation from carriers in challenging management's decisions. He emphasizes the need to challenge management's attempts to use averages where no standards exist and stresses the importance of documenting any instances of management misconduct. Corey then addresses the issue of management's attempts to manipulate data and intimidate carriers, providing examples of how management uses the scanner data to target carriers and the need for strong, proactive responses. He highlights the importance of understanding and utilizing M-1458 to counter management's reliance on GPS data as the sole basis for discipline and urges members to challenge management's attempts to impose arbitrary time limits, especially concerning breaks, lunches, and other time-off allowances. He emphasizes that any attempts by management to reduce office time, such as by imposing an unrealistic one-hour limit, should be immediately grieved. The episode shifts to discuss the upcoming CLC Zoom meeting focused on the “Vote No” campaign, urging members to participate. He also promotes a planned episode focusing on strategies for dealing with narcissistic individuals and emphasizes the need for stronger, more unified action from the union leadership. Corey concludes by reiterating his commitment to fighting for the city letter carriers and promoting the upcoming route inspection training series.http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode addresses the reaction to the tentative agreement and provides further education on 6-day counts, focusing on strategies for challenging management's actions during route inspections. Corey begins with listener shout-outs and promotes several podcasts focused on union issues. He then clarifies that he has not blocked any emails sent to his fromatoarbitration.com address; the issue is a full inbox preventing notification of incoming messages. He announces a new monthly podcast segment dedicated to CCA issues, emphasizing the importance of supporting and empowering CCAs. Corey expresses his strong disapproval of the tentative agreement, characterizing it as a major setback for letter carriers. He criticizes those who attempt to justify the agreement based on the postal service's financial situation, arguing that the postal service's mismanagement is to blame and that letter carriers should not bear the burden of those failures. He points out several concerning aspects of the agreement, such as the retention of the CCA position, the inadequate pay increases, and the lack of meaningful improvements to the grievance process and the lack of attention paid to the issue of non-compliance with existing agreements and settlements. He emphasizes that the agreement is a direct result of the current union leadership's cowardice and inaction and predicts that the members will overwhelmingly reject it. He then shifts to providing detailed instructions on how to effectively respond to management's attempts to manipulate data and impose arbitrary time limits during 6-day counts. He highlights the importance of understanding the relevant handbook provisions, meticulous record-keeping, and assertive advocacy in challenging management actions. He discusses several arbitration cases, emphasizing the recurring themes of management's disregard for established procedures, the significance of carrier input in route adjustments, and the need to actively challenge management's time deductions and their use of averages to evaluate routes. Corey addresses the issue of management's use of the scanner data to monitor and discipline carriers, emphasizing that this constitutes a violation of the M-39 handbook, section 134, and that GPS data cannot be the sole determinant for disciplinary actions. He provides specific examples of how management uses this data to harass and intimidate carriers and emphasizes the need for strong, proactive responses, and he provides detailed instructions on how to complete the necessary forms, emphasizing the importance of accurately recording all time entries, challenging management's time deductions, and maintaining consistency in daily work practices during the inspection week. He highlights the importance of documenting any instances of management misconduct and using that documentation to file grievances. Corey then provides advice on how to deal with chronic liars and those exhibiting narcissistic tendencies, drawing on his experience in arbitration. He emphasizes the importance of gathering irrefutable evidence to counter their claims, using that evidence to effectively challenge their statements, expose their contradictions, and discredit their testimony. Corey concludes by urging members to remain engaged, to actively participate in the upcoming “Vote No” campaign, and to prepare for a more assertive and militant approach to contract negotiations under the new CLC leadership. He promises to continue providing educational resources and support to members and emphasizes the importance of prioritizing the needs and rights of the city letter carriers above all else. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode continues the 6-day count education series, focusing on specific procedures and strategies for challenging management's actions during route inspections. Corey begins with listener shout-outs, promoting the work of several union activists and highlighting the "Tallest Nail" podcast, which focuses on CCA issues. He then addresses a listener's comment about arbitrators lacking feelings, countering this with personal anecdotes about how arbitrators often show sympathy, particularly towards veterans, and emphasizes the importance of making arbitrators aware of such mitigating factors. The main focus is on providing guidance for handling route count inspections. Corey emphasizes the importance of understanding the regulations, meticulous record-keeping, and assertive advocacy. He reviews several key provisions from the 2018 NALC Route Inspection Pocket Handbook, detailing requirements for unit reviews, dry run training, advance notice, and carrier consultations, stressing the need for accurate time recording and the importance of challenging management's attempts to manipulate data and impose arbitrary time limits. He highlights the significance of the "no street standard" provision in challenging time deductions and emphasizes the importance of carriers actively participating in consultations and documenting any instances of management misconduct. He explains how to effectively respond to management attempts to deduct time for minor activities, such as stopping to talk to a customer, and how to identify and counter potentially misleading statements made by management during the consultation process. Corey then addresses the issue of management's attempts to impose unrealistic time limits, such as the one-hour office time limit and the 22-minute load time, and expresses frustration with the union's failure to provide adequate guidance and support to members in combating such tactics. He criticizes the lack of leadership from the national union, noting the continued lack of a national strategy for dealing with these issues and the silence from the leadership in the face of widespread reports of management misconduct. He discusses the ongoing issue of non-compliance with grievance settlements and emphasizes the importance of utilizing all available legal and procedural avenues to fight against management abuses. He specifically emphasizes the importance of seeking cease-and-desist orders and escalated monetary awards to incentivize compliance. He uses anecdotes from his arbitration cases to illustrate effective strategies for handling management's dishonesty and for challenging their narratives. He highlights the importance of focusing on the “just cause” requirements of Article 16 and of utilizing M-1458 to counter the use of GPS data as the sole determinant for disciplinary actions. He also stresses the need to challenge management's attempts to impose arbitrary time limits and to use the carrier consultation to effectively document and contest those adjustments. The episode concludes with a passionate call for greater member engagement, education, and a renewed commitment to fighting for a stronger, more member-focused union. Corey urges members to reject the tentative agreement and to actively participate in the upcoming "Vote No" campaign, and he promotes several online resources for obtaining additional information. He emphasizes the importance of standing united to combat the current leadership's failures and to build a more militant and effective union that prioritizes the needs of its members.http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on strategies for dealing with chronic liars and individuals exhibiting narcissistic tendencies, particularly relevant in union grievance processes and arbitration hearings. Corey begins with a listener shout-out and promotes a vote-no rally against the tentative agreement. He then criticizes social media posts that attempt to downplay the severity of the tentative agreement by citing the postal service's financial losses. He emphasizes the need for evidence-based arguments and challenges the assertion that arbitrators will automatically reject any substantial pay increase due to the postal service's financial situation. The main focus is on identifying and addressing the behaviors of chronic liars and narcissists, providing practical advice for union representatives. Corey emphasizes the importance of gathering irrefutable evidence to counter their claims, highlighting the effectiveness of using this evidence to challenge their statements and expose their dishonesty. He uses examples from his own arbitration experiences to demonstrate how to expose a liar's contradictions and to effectively utilize evidence to discredit their testimony. He emphasizes the importance of not allowing oneself to be intimidated or sidetracked by their persuasive but ultimately untruthful narratives. Corey then analyzes the recent handling of the charges against President Renfroe, highlighting Renfroe's untruthfulness and lack of remorse, and the executive council's failure to hold him accountable. He uses specific examples of Renfro's dishonesty, such as his conflicting statements about the availability of meetings, his failure to apologize for his actions, and the misrepresentation of the numbers to make the TA look better, to illustrate the importance of having concrete evidence when confronting a narcissist. He then shifts to discussing the implications of the tentative agreement and the importance of mobilizing members to vote “no” in the upcoming ratification vote. He criticizes the lack of transparency around the tentative agreement's details, the lack of member involvement in the negotiation process, and the apparent attempt by the leadership to downplay or dismiss member concerns. Corey details the upcoming vote-no campaign and urges members to engage actively and to get involved. He promotes an upcoming episode on how to effectively communicate with narcissistic individuals and highlights several online resources for further information and education on grievance procedures and arbitration. He concludes with an impassioned plea for greater member engagement and a renewed commitment to fighting for a stronger, more representative union, and he emphasizes the need for increased militancy within the NALC to combat management's manipulative tactics and to ensure the members' needs and rights are prioritized.http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode continues the 6-day count education series, focusing on the procedures and regulations outlined in the 2018 NALC Route Inspection Pocket Handbook. Corey begins with listener shout-outs and promotes the "Tallest Nail" podcast, which focuses on CCA issues and the upcoming contract vote. He then announces upcoming episodes, including a discussion with Charlie Miller and an episode on how to effectively communicate with and challenge narcissistic individuals. The main focus is a detailed explanation of the route inspection process, emphasizing the importance of meticulous record-keeping, accurate time recording, and understanding the specific requirements for various line items on the 1838c form. Corey stresses the importance of challenging management's attempts to manipulate data and impose arbitrary time limits, emphasizing how management often tries to deduct time for seemingly minor activities. He stresses the need to challenge management's attempts to use the 1840-R as definitive proof of agreement and to use the opportunity of the carrier consultation to actively challenge any proposed adjustments. He highlights the crucial role of shop stewards in educating carriers and ensuring their rights are protected during the inspection. He reminds listeners that the lack of a street standard prevents management from setting arbitrary paces or time limits for tasks performed on the route and that this must be asserted in any challenge to time deductions or route adjustments. Corey discusses several examples of management's attempts to manipulate data and intimidate carriers during 6-day counts, providing specific examples and emphasizing the need for strong, proactive responses. He stresses the importance of filing grievances to challenge management's actions and to ensure that all relevant information and documentation is included in those grievances. He provides detailed instructions on how to complete the necessary forms and emphasizes the importance of accurately recording all time entries and of noting any discrepancies or instances of management misconduct. He then criticizes the lack of leadership and education provided by the national union in addressing these issues and emphasizes that this lack of leadership has emboldened management to engage in increasingly aggressive tactics. He urges members to remain vigilant and to actively challenge any attempts by management to manipulate data, impose arbitrary time limits, and to engage in intimidation tactics. Corey highlights the importance of using the route inspection process as an opportunity to expose management's incompetence and secure favorable settlements for letter carriers. He closes by promoting the upcoming "Vote No" campaign and emphasizing the need for a more militant and member-focused union approach. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode features Charlie Miller discussing the tentative agreement and the ongoing efforts to mobilize support for a "no" vote. Miller begins by sharing personal anecdotes about his early career, highlighting the significant improvements in letter carrier wages and benefits achieved through past union actions. He then contrasts this with the current situation, emphasizing the inadequacy of the tentative agreement and the erosion of letter carriers' standing within the industry. Miller argues that the tentative agreement represents a failure of leadership and a lack of respect for letter carriers' contributions. He urges a "no" vote, emphasizing that the proposed pay increases are insufficient to address the impact of inflation and do not reflect the value of letter carriers' work. He stresses the importance of considering the entire context of the agreement, noting that many crucial issues remain unaddressed and that the projected COLA increases are not guaranteed. Miller then explains the arbitration process and addresses concerns about the risks involved in rejecting the tentative agreement and going to arbitration. He argues that the risks of arbitration are minimal compared to the potential losses associated with accepting an inadequate contract and that a strong case can be made for arbitration based on the Postal Reorganization Act's requirement for comparable pay to the private sector and on the fact that the current agreement is demonstrably insufficient for many carriers to earn a living wage. He further emphasizes the importance of obtaining the best possible financial outcome for letter carriers and notes that the current agreement does not sufficiently address the problems of non-compliance, toxic work environments, and the need to eliminate the CCA classification. He discusses the events leading up to the announcement of the tentative agreement, highlighting the lack of transparency and member input. He points out the seeming disregard shown by the president for the opinions of the executive council members and suggests that the tentative agreement may have been the postal service's initial offer. He emphasizes the importance of open communication and member engagement in making decisions about the tentative agreement and highlights the efforts of the CLC to ensure that the appeals process of the Renfro charges goes forward. Miller expresses his strong support for James Henry's candidacy and his commitment to fighting for a better contract and a more member-focused union. He reiterates his belief in the importance of transparency, accountability, and a more aggressive approach to bargaining, urging members to vote "no" on the tentative agreement and to get involved in the ongoing efforts to reform the NALC. He closes by underscoring the need for renewed militancy within the union and for a return to the principles of solidarity and member empowerment that characterized past successful union campaigns. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode continues the 6-day count education series, focusing on the detailed procedures and regulations outlined in the 2018 NALC Route Inspection Pocket Handbook. Corey begins with listener shout-outs, highlighting the contributions of several stewards and promoting the "Hot House with Richie Ray" podcast. He then discusses a recent arbitration win, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive case preparation and the need to challenge management's attempts to manipulate data and impose arbitrary time limits. The main part of the episode involves a detailed reading of sections from the 2018 NALC Route Inspection Pocket Handbook. Corey meticulously explains the procedures for route count inspections, emphasizing key aspects such as the requirements for unit and route reviews, dry run training, advance notice, and carrier consultations. He highlights the importance of meticulous documentation, accurate time recording, and assertive advocacy in challenging management's actions during the inspection process, and he provides specific guidance on completing PS Forms 1838-C, 1840, and 3999, emphasizing the importance of recording all relevant information accurately and of utilizing line item entries effectively. Corey emphasizes the need to challenge management's attempts to manipulate data and impose arbitrary time standards, specifically focusing on the calculation of office and street times, the use of auxiliary assistance, and the exclusion of Saturdays from the count on routes with abbreviated deliveries. He provides detailed instructions for navigating carrier consultations, emphasizing the importance of obtaining all relevant documentation and of actively participating in the process. He discusses management's attempts to circumvent established procedures, such as imposing unrealistic time limits, changing established work practices, and using intimidation tactics to pressure carriers into accepting under-time. He provides specific guidance on how to handle these situations and emphasizes the need to file grievances and challenge management's attempts to circumvent established procedures and contractual obligations. He stresses the need to challenge management's use of technology for surveillance and disciplinary actions, emphasizing the importance of understanding and utilizing M-1458 to challenge the use of GPS data as the sole basis for discipline. The episode concludes with announcements regarding upcoming podcast guests (Charlie Miller and a planned episode on dealing with narcissistic behavior) and a call for continued member engagement and education. Corey reiterates his commitment to fighting for the city letter carriers and encourages listeners to utilize the provided resources to effectively prepare for upcoming 6-day counts. He emphasizes the importance of preparing for 6-day counts and of using them as an opportunity to challenge management's actions and secure significant monetary remedies for carriers.http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode features Tyler Vasseur of Build a Fighting NALC (BFN) discussing the recently released tentative agreement and BFN's planned "Vote No" campaign. Vasseur begins by expressing his strong disapproval of the tentative agreement, characterizing it as a significant setback for letter carriers and emphasizing the need for a more assertive approach to contract negotiations. He outlines BFN's core demands: a $30/hour starting wage, raises for all steps, top pay comparable to UPS, a reduction in the time to reach top pay, full COLAs, and an end to mandatory overtime. Vasseur then recounts BFN's growth and development over the past year, highlighting the increased support for open bargaining and the launch of BFN as a rank-and-file reform movement. He emphasizes BFN's commitment to building a more democratic and member-driven union, one that actively engages the membership in the decision-making process. He highlights BFN's position on the right to strike, emphasizing the importance of this as a tool for achieving better wages and working conditions and for holding union leadership accountable. BFN's "Vote No" campaign is discussed, emphasizing the need for organized action rather than simply relying on momentum. Vasseur details the plans for an upcoming Zoom meeting to launch the campaign, highlighting the need for maximum unity among various reform groups to send a strong message to the NALC leadership. He outlines the campaign's strategies for mobilizing members, emphasizing the importance of direct communication, public rallies, and increased member participation. Vasseur discusses the creation of a new BFN website with resources for organizing rallies and other activities. The conversation addresses concerns about the lack of transparency in the contract negotiations, the potential for members to feel pressured to vote "yes" on the tentative agreement despite their dissatisfaction and the need to counteract the potential influence of the existing leadership by empowering members to make informed decisions based on a clear understanding of their own needs and what they deserve. Vasseur emphasizes the need for a more assertive bargaining position, one that prioritizes the needs of the letter carriers, and he stresses the importance of utilizing all available resources, including arbitration, to secure a better contract. He underscores that the "Vote No" campaign is not simply about rejecting the tentative agreement; it's about building a stronger, more militant union that will actively fight for its members' rights in the years to come. The episode concludes with a call to action, urging members to join the "Vote No" campaign and to participate in the upcoming Zoom meeting. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/ https://www.fightingnalc.com/

This episode features Mike Caref and several other branch presidents discussing the recently released tentative NALC contract agreement. Caref begins by describing the events leading up to the announcement of the tentative agreement, including the canceled meeting of national business agents in Houston and the subsequent meeting in Washington D.C. He emphasizes the lack of transparency and member input in the negotiation process. The group expresses their disappointment and anger with the tentative agreement, which they view as inadequate and disrespectful to letter carriers, particularly given the long duration of negotiations and the impact of inflation on their wages. They point out that the agreement offers little in terms of concrete gains for letter carriers and in some areas, even represents a step backward. They then highlight several key concerns: the insufficient pay increases (particularly for those in the middle of the pay scale), the continued existence of the CCA classification, the lack of meaningful improvements to the grievance process, and the absence of progress on issues like mandatory overtime and toxic work environments. The group discusses the implications of the agreement, such as the potential for a "no" vote and the need to go to arbitration if the tentative agreement is rejected. They specifically address the issue of management's attempts to impose an unrealistic one-hour office time limit and the utilization of GPS data to monitor and discipline carriers. The discussion shifts to the planned October 14th contract rallies, emphasizing the importance of member mobilization and public awareness campaigns to pressure the USPS into negotiating a fair contract. The group members share their strategies for organizing the rallies in their respective regions and emphasize the need for coordinated action to maximize their impact. They note how the lack of transparency around the tentative agreement has already led to increased frustration among the members and are using that to generate momentum for the rallies. The group members highlight the lack of leadership and accountability within the current NALC administration and express their support for the CLC's efforts to bring about change. They detail the ongoing efforts to mobilize support for the CLC's candidate, James Henry. They discuss the need for a more assertive and member-focused approach to bargaining, emphasizing the importance of utilizing all available tools and resources, including arbitration and public pressure, to achieve a fair contract. They close by urging members to remain engaged, informed, and prepared to vote against the tentative agreement if necessary and to participate in the upcoming rallies. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode features James Henry, NALC vice president and CLC presidential candidate, delivering a prepared statement on the tentative agreement and responding to listener questions. Henry begins by acknowledging the widespread disappointment among letter carriers regarding the tentative agreement and expresses his own strong disapproval, stating he will vote "no" and urging others to do the same. He emphasizes that the tentative agreement falls far short of what letter carriers deserve, failing to reflect their contributions and dedication, and he criticizes the lack of transparency and member input in the negotiation process. He highlights the fact that the agreement offers little improvement over the existing contract, and in some areas, represents a step backward, particularly when considering inflation. He uses the historical context of the 1970 strike to illustrate the inadequacy of the current agreement, demonstrating that adjusted for inflation, entry-level wages are lower now than they were then. Henry addresses listener questions, explaining that the tentative agreement was presented to the executive council without prior discussion or a vote, further emphasizing the lack of transparency. He discusses accusations of falling asleep during meetings, attributing this to exhaustion from personal issues and heavy travel demands. He refutes allegations of misconduct from his early career, asserting his innocence and attributing any previous disciplinary actions to unjust targeting. He clarifies that his decision to run for president was not a result of any DEI initiative but rather a response to a moral obligation to fight for the rights and well-being of letter carriers. He emphasizes the need for transparency in negotiations and stresses his commitment to keeping the membership informed about contract developments. He explains that his plan is to build a stronger, more member-focused NALC by actively involving the membership in the decision-making process, prioritizing their concerns and needs. He highlights the need for a more assertive and aggressive approach to bargaining with USPS and to address the noncompliance issues and the backlog of grievances that currently plague the union. He acknowledges the risk of going to arbitration, but asserts that the current situation warrants such a step. He emphasizes the importance of unity and encourages members to remain actively involved in the union, urging them not to leave the organization despite their frustrations. Henry closes by emphasizing the need to reclaim the union's historic commitment to fighting for its members and to ensure justice is served, even if it means taking a long-term perspective and potentially facing challenges in the coming years. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/ https://concernedlettercarriers.com/

This episode expresses Corey's strong disapproval of the tentative NALC contract agreement, characterizing it as a concession to management that offers little to letter carriers. He begins by announcing upcoming podcast guests (Mike Caref, Tyler Vasseur, and James Henry) and a multi-part series on 6-day counts. He then addresses rumors about his encounter with postal inspectors, emphasizing that it was a voluntary meeting with no negative consequences. Corey strongly criticizes the tentative agreement, arguing it represents a failure of leadership and a betrayal of the membership. He dismisses those who attempt to justify the agreement by citing the postal service's financial difficulties, emphasizing that the postal service's mismanagement is the root cause of its financial problems and that letter carriers should not bear the brunt of that mismanagement. He highlights specific areas of concern within the agreement: the retention of the CCA position, inadequate pay increases, and the lack of progress on issues like non-compliance, mandatory overtime, and toxic work environments. He then details Mike Caref's filing of Article 10 charges against President Renfroe, emphasizing the importance of holding union leadership accountable for its failures. He describes the meeting of national business agents from which Caref was excluded, highlighting this as a further example of the union's disarray and lack of transparency. He urges listeners to contact their business agents to demand accountability for this exclusion. Corey strongly criticizes the business agents' attempts to influence the membership's vote on the Renfroe charges, emphasizing the unethical nature of these actions and calling for disciplinary measures against those involved. He then shifts to discussing the planned October 14th contract rallies, emphasizing the need for member mobilization and public awareness campaigns to pressure the USPS into negotiating a fair contract. He encourages members to participate actively and to prepare for potential pushback from management. Corey provides examples of management's tactics to pressure and intimidate carriers, such as imposing arbitrary office time limits, using scanner data for disciplinary actions, and threatening to deduct pay for stationary events. He provides detailed instructions for responding to such actions through the grievance procedure, including the use of M-1458 to challenge the use of GPS data as the sole basis for discipline. He then discusses the importance of educating members about their rights and responsibilities and urges members not to be intimidated into accepting unfair treatment. Corey expresses his frustration with the current union leadership, emphasizing the need for a complete overhaul of the organization and a return to a more militant and member-focused approach. He closes by reiterating his commitment to fighting for the city letter carriers and urging members to vote against the tentative agreement. He promotes future episodes focusing on 6-day counts and encourages continued member involvement and engagement in the ongoing efforts to reform the NALC. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on the implications of Mike Caref filing charges against NALC President Renfroe and the need for a more militant union approach to combat management abuses. Corey begins with listener shout-outs and an advertisement for Brookfield Uniforms, emphasizing the importance of supporting businesses that value letter carriers. He then addresses rumors about his own interaction with postal inspectors, clarifying that he was questioned but not arrested or disciplined. The core of the episode centers on Caref's announcement of charges against Renfroe, citing Renfroe's negligence in contract negotiations, lack of transparency, and failure to adhere to convention resolutions. Caref details the process for handling the charges and emphasizes the importance of member participation in holding union leaders accountable. He stresses that the charges are intended to prevent Renfroe from being the chief negotiator in the next round of bargaining. He highlights the extended timeframe of negotiations and the negative impact of the lack of transparency on member morale and the union's ability to bargain effectively. Corey emphasizes the importance of a unified front against management and calls for greater member engagement in the process. Corey then pivots to discussing the planned contract rallies on October 14th, emphasizing the need for proactive member mobilization and public awareness campaigns. He discusses the importance of using this opportunity to pressure the USPS into negotiating a fair contract and highlights the need for a more unified and assertive approach from the union leadership. He notes that many members feel demoralized and are considering leaving the union due to the prolonged contract negotiations and management's unwillingness to comply with contracts and agreements. He then pivots to discussing the need for greater accountability among union leadership. Corey criticizes the current leadership's response to various issues, such as the falsification of HIP training records and the use of GPS data for disciplinary actions. He emphasizes the need for a more aggressive and proactive approach to grievance filing and contract negotiations, advocating for a return to a more militant union culture that prioritizes member needs and holds both management and union leaders accountable for their actions. He highlights examples of management misconduct such as the imposition of arbitrary time limits, the use of intimidation tactics, and the practice of taking unauthorized photographs of carriers' cases. He emphasizes that management's actions are driven by a desire to cut costs at the expense of carrier well-being and that this needs to be met with an equally forceful response from the union. He provides specific examples of grievances and arbitration cases where significant monetary awards were obtained, emphasizing the importance of seeking escalated remedies for non-compliance and of using cease-and-desist language in settlements. He stresses the need for a unified, national strategy for handling grievances and for greater member education on these issues. He concludes with a call for a complete overhaul of the union's leadership to replace the current “cowards and ass-kissers” with truly militant leaders who will prioritize the needs of city letter carriers. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

In this episode, Corey interviews Mike Carref about the ongoing contract negotiations with the US Postal Service. Mike expresses frustration over the lack of transparency and progress in the negotiations, particularly the absence of a tentative agreement and the delayed arbitration dates. He criticizes President Renfroe's leadership, highlighting his lack of communication with the executive council and the membership regarding the negotiations.Mike details the charges he has filed against President Renfroe, accusing him of negligence and mishandling the collective bargaining process. He discusses the rationale behind the charges, including the president's failure to adhere to convention resolutions regarding transparency and his disregard for the membership's interests.The episode also delves into the history of collective bargaining for letter carriers, emphasizing the significance of arbitration and the potential consequences of the current delays. Mike encourages listeners to join the charge against President Renfroe by signing a petition. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSezkbOtAahTYh3nf5AcqDrBqD6IAw-plusYLutWBuXSCPta0g/viewform?vc=0&c=0&w=1&flr=0 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode delves deeper into the complexities of 6-day counts, providing detailed information and analysis to help letter carriers prepare for upcoming route inspections. Corey begins with listener shout-outs and an advertisement for Brookfield Uniforms, emphasizing the importance of supporting businesses that are supportive of letter carriers. He then discusses a recent arbitration where he successfully defended a carrier against disciplinary action based on inaccurate GPS data, highlighting the need to challenge management's reliance on technology for performance evaluations. The core of the episode involves a comprehensive review of several arbitration awards and a detailed explanation of the procedures and regulations outlined in the 2018 NALC Route Inspection Pocket Handbook. He stresses the importance of meticulous documentation, thorough preparation, and assertive advocacy in challenging management's actions during 6-day counts, and he provides a detailed breakdown of the steps involved in the route inspection process, emphasizing the importance of carrier participation in consultations and the need to challenge improper time deductions and the use of averages in evaluating routes. Corey emphasizes the need to challenge management's attempts to manipulate data and impose arbitrary standards, especially when those standards are derived from expired memos, such as the TRAP memos. Corey discusses instances of management's attempts to manipulate 6-day counts, such as imposing arbitrary office time limits, altering established work practices, and using intimidation tactics to pressure carriers into accepting under-time. He provides specific guidance on how to handle these situations, emphasizing the importance of filing grievances and challenging management's attempts to circumvent established procedures and contractual obligations. He provides specific examples of grievances that can be filed, emphasizing the importance of challenging management's use of scanner data for disciplinary actions and their attempts to impose arbitrary time limits on tasks and their use of local policies that contradict the national agreement. He highlights the critical role of shop stewards in educating carriers and ensuring their rights are protected and encourages members to actively challenge management's actions during 6-day counts. He provides detailed information on how to complete PS Forms 1838c, 1840, and 3999, emphasizing the importance of recording all relevant information accurately, highlighting the need to challenge management's attempts to use these forms for inappropriate disciplinary action. The episode concludes with a discussion of the need for stronger union leadership and a more aggressive approach to combating management abuses. Corey criticizes the current leadership's inaction on key issues and emphasizes the importance of member education and mobilization in achieving meaningful change within the NALC. He promotes several resources for handling 6-day counts and encourages listeners to utilize these resources to effectively prepare for upcoming inspections. The episode ends with a call to action for members to stand up against management's abuses and to fight for their rights. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode continues the series on 6-day counts, providing detailed analysis of arbitration cases to help letter carriers prepare for upcoming inspections. Corey begins with listener shout-outs and an advertisement for Brookfield Uniforms, emphasizing the importance of supporting businesses that value letter carriers. He then recounts an incident where management attempted to impose a 5-minute PM office time limit during a 6-day count, highlighting the dishonesty of management and the need for strong, proactive union responses. The core of the episode involves a thorough review of several arbitration awards related to route count inspections. Corey meticulously presents key excerpts, emphasizing recurring themes and providing valuable insights for stewards and advocates. He highlights management's frequent disregard for established procedures, the significance of carrier input in route adjustments, and the use of post-implementation workload data to demonstrate overburdened routes. Corey stresses the importance of strong language in grievance settlements, the need for thorough documentation, and the utilization of work hour workload reports to support claims of overburdened routes. He analyzes several cases, emphasizing how arbitrators addressed issues such as carrier input, management's misuse of signatures on forms, and the inclusion of CCAs in remedy calculations. Corey draws attention to how arbitrators ruled on management's attempts to deduct time for seemingly minor activities, such as picking up dropped mail or pausing to speak to a customer, emphasizing that these seemingly minor deductions add up significantly over time. Corey then addresses several examples of management misconduct, including the imposition of unrealistic office and street time limits and the practice of taking unauthorized photographs of carriers' cases. He provides detailed grievance templates and sample contentions for addressing these issues. He stresses the importance of challenging management's use of technology for surveillance and disciplinary actions and urges members to document all instances of such actions and to use such documentation in grievances. Corey emphasizes the importance of carrier consultations and the need to actively participate and challenge management's attempts to manipulate data and impose arbitrary time standards. He stresses the importance of noting when management fails to provide necessary documentation and to challenge management's attempts to use signatures on forms as evidence of agreement. He further highlights how management often tries to justify time deductions based on perceived inefficiencies, emphasizing that this should be challenged based on the lack of a street standard. Corey concludes by promoting resources for handling 6-day counts and encouraging members to proactively seek training and education. He reiterates the importance of using 6-day counts as an opportunity to challenge management's actions and secure significant monetary remedies for carriers. He ends by emphasizing the need for a more aggressive and unified union approach to combat management's ongoing abuses. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode features a question-and-answer session with Mike Caref, focusing on his plans for the NALC presidency and addressing various concerns facing letter carriers. Caref begins by acknowledging the recent convention and expressing gratitude for the support he received. He then clarifies his position regarding the CLC, stating that while he is no longer formally involved, he maintains positive relationships with many members and remains open to future collaboration. The Q&A covers a wide range of topics: Caref discusses his significant accomplishments and failures as a union representative, highlighting his success in securing settlements in the grievance process while acknowledging the shortcomings of the national executive council. He explains his vision for leadership, emphasizing the need for a more aggressive and member-focused approach. He states his priorities are to ensure that the union's actions are always transparent and clearly benefit the membership; to ensure that grievance procedures are efficient and effective; and to implement a strong and unified training program for all union members. He discusses the importance of member participation in the upcoming election, outlining strategies for mobilizing the membership, especially among table 2 carriers. He addresses concerns about a potential split vote and the possibility of Renfroe's re-election, emphasizing that his priority is Renfroe's defeat, even if it means not securing the presidency himself. He outlines his plans for improving the grievance process, particularly addressing the backlog of cases at Step B, advocating for a more assertive approach to contract enforcement and for increased utilization of arbitration. He addresses concerns about the lack of transparency in contract negotiations and emphasizes the need for regular updates to the membership, advocating for open bargaining and a strong public campaign to build support for the union's demands. He also discusses issues such as start times, Sunday work, and the need to eliminate the CCA classification and ensure fair pay for all letter carriers. He emphasizes the importance of taking a long-term view to build a stronger union, and he closes by urging members to participate in the upcoming Columbus Day rallies and to join the BFN movement. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on preparing letter carriers for upcoming 6-day counts, providing a detailed review of relevant handbook provisions and arbitration decisions. Corey begins with listener shout-outs and an advertisement for Brookfield Uniforms, emphasizing his support for businesses that show a commitment to letter carriers. He then corrects a previous shout-out and shares additional shout-outs from listeners. The main portion of the episode involves a comprehensive review of excerpts from several arbitration decisions related to route count inspections and adjustments. Corey highlights key aspects of each case, emphasizing recurrent issues such as management's failure to follow established procedures, the importance of carrier input, and the methods for demonstrating overburdened routes. He particularly emphasizes the use of work hour workload reports to illustrate the impact of improper route adjustments. He stresses the need to use strong language in grievance settlements and highlights how arbitrators often consider carrier input in route adjustments and the inclusion of CCAs in remedy calculations. Corey discusses several examples of management misconduct, including the practice of imposing unrealistic case time limits and taking unauthorized photographs of carriers' cases. He provides detailed grievance templates, information requests, and contentions for addressing these issues. He emphasizes the importance of meticulous documentation, thorough investigation, and assertive advocacy to challenge management's actions. The episode includes detailed explanations of how to complete PS Forms 1838c, 1840, and 3999, emphasizing the importance of recording all relevant information accurately and of utilizing line item entries effectively. He provides specific guidance on how to challenge management's time deductions, emphasizing the need to document all activities and to maintain consistency in daily work practices during the inspection week. Corey repeatedly stresses the need to challenge management's attempts to manipulate data and impose unrealistic time standards. Corey promotes resources for handling 6-day counts, including podcasts and YouTube videos, and encourages members to actively seek training and education to become well-versed in the relevant procedures and regulations. He concludes by emphasizing the importance of using 6-day counts as an opportunity to punish management for their incompetence and secure significant monetary remedies for carriers. He encourages listeners to remain vigilant, to prepare for the challenges ahead, and to stand united in their fight for fair treatment. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode features Rob and Calvin from Build a Fighting NALC (BFN), discussing their movement and plans for the upcoming contract negotiations. They begin by recounting the successful contract rally held in Pasadena, highlighting the strong member participation and the role of BFN in providing organizational support. They emphasize that such rallies are crucial for reviving collective action within the NALC. Rob and Calvin then outline BFN's strategy moving forward, focusing on building chapters across the country to create a more structured and sustainable reform movement. They aim to provide resources and training to help members become active participants in union activities, emphasizing the importance of proactive engagement rather than a solely reactive approach. The creation of a new BFN website with resources and contact information is announced. The conversation shifts to the importance of reclaiming the NALC's militant history, drawing parallels to the 1970 wildcat strike and emphasizing the power of rank-and-file mobilization. They highlight the need to counter the current leadership's passive approach, which they argue has led to member disengagement and ineffective contract negotiations. They emphasize the need for a more aggressive and transparent bargaining strategy, which includes open bargaining and a willingness to use the threat of a strike. They discuss the need for a unified approach to addressing issues like low wages, poor working conditions, and management's non-compliance with contracts. They highlight the importance of educating members about their rights, empowering them to fight for better treatment, and building a stronger, more democratic union. They emphasize that this involves not just fighting against management but also challenging the existing union structure and leadership that has failed to adequately represent the rank and file. The conversation ends with a call to action for members to participate in the upcoming Columbus Day rally and to join the BFN movement. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/ https://www.fightingnalc.com/

This episode delves into the complexities of 6-day counts, providing a comprehensive analysis of several arbitration cases to equip listeners with the knowledge to effectively handle these situations. Corey begins with listener shout-outs, expressing gratitude for their support and highlighting the contributions of various members and branches. He then corrects a previous shout-out and discusses a listener's negative reaction to the GoFundMe campaign for Corey. The core of the episode involves a detailed review of several arbitration cases concerning route adjustments and inspections. Corey meticulously reads excerpts from these decisions, emphasizing recurring themes and providing valuable insights for stewards and advocates. Key areas of focus include: management's frequent failure to adhere to established procedures (e.g., providing necessary information to carriers and the union in a timely manner), the importance of demonstrating harm caused by improper route adjustments, and the utilization of work hour workload reports to illustrate overburdened routes. Corey emphasizes the need for strong language (such as "cease and desist") in grievance settlements and highlights the importance of ensuring arbitrators understand the impact of management's actions on carriers' working conditions and well-being. Specific attention is given to how the arbitrators addressed the issue of carrier input, management's attempts to use signatures on forms as proof of agreement, and the inclusion of CCAs in remedy calculations. Corey discusses several instances of management misconduct, including the imposition of unrealistic case time limits, the use of scanner data to target carriers for discipline, and the practice of taking unauthorized photographs of carriers' cases. He provides a detailed grievance template for addressing the issue of management taking pictures of carriers' cases, along with relevant contract provisions, contentions, and sample b team decisions. He stresses the importance of challenging management's use of technology for surveillance and disciplinary actions, emphasizing the need to rely on evidence-based arguments and to avoid being intimidated or manipulated. The episode concludes with an overview of resources for handling 6-day counts, including promotion of the NALC Branch 458 podcast and John Murphy's YouTube videos. Corey reiterates the importance of preparation and encourages members to become well-versed in the relevant regulations and procedures. He emphasizes the need to aggressively challenge management's actions during 6-day counts and to utilize those situations to secure significant monetary remedies for carriers. He concludes by announcing future episodes focused on 6-day counts and emphasizing his commitment to educating and empowering letter carriers. Cites: https://fromatoarbitration.com/episodes-101-200/ https://fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on an upcoming nationwide rap session organized by Mike Caref to discuss the ongoing contract negotiations and strategize for a strong contract. Caref explains the session's goals: to analyze any tentative agreement (if reached), to utilize the recently passed open bargaining resolution to improve transparency and member engagement, and to develop plans for mobilizing the membership. He outlines the planned speakers: Josh Brouillette (discussing the recently passed resolution on member updates and public mobilization), Tyler Vasseur (providing an update on the Build a Fighting NALC movement and sharing a template letter for members to contact Renfroe), Dave Grosskopf (detailing successful strategies for public rallies), Elise Foster (sharing insights from Chicago rallies), and Tom Cser (presenting on member mobilization for elections and ratification votes). Caref will also speak, along with Corey Walton, and James Henry. Caref emphasizes the importance of member participation and unity in achieving a strong contract, noting the significant impact of inflation on letter carriers' wages and the need to address non-economic issues. He highlights the shortcomings of the current negotiation process, particularly the lack of transparency and the resulting disengagement of the membership. He also addresses criticism surrounding the decision to hold the rap session on a Sunday, acknowledging scheduling conflicts but emphasizing the importance of the session despite these concerns. He promotes the rap session's goal to educate members on their rights and expectations so they can participate meaningfully in the final decision-making process concerning the new contract. The discussion delves into the challenges faced in the current negotiation process, highlighting the union's failure to maintain a strong, assertive bargaining approach. They discuss the need to re-weaponize arbitration, the lack of accountability for management's non-compliance with grievance settlements, and the importance of a unified strategy across all regions. Caref expresses concern that the current prolonged negotiation process may lead to members accepting a less-than-ideal contract due to financial pressures. He stresses that members should remain engaged, informed, and prepared to advocate for a contract that truly meets their needs. They provide details on how to register for the rap session and emphasize the importance of collective action in achieving the best possible outcome. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdusYcfs1rCtag_S3VNfMnliKOkUoU1lJXi8Jh3iE3r1Njq-A/viewform?pli=1 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on preparing letter carriers for upcoming 6-day counts by providing in-depth analysis of several arbitration cases related to route adjustments and inspections. Corey begins by announcing plans for future episodes, including a multi-part series on 6-day counts and a new educational podcast series for the CLC. He expresses his gratitude to Mallory Sutton for updating the FromAtoArbitration.com website and encourages members to utilize the site's resources. He then clarifies a previous shout-out, correcting misinformation about Corey Grott's relationship with the podcast. The main portion of the episode involves Corey reading excerpts from seven arbitration decisions. He highlights key aspects of each case, emphasizing recurring themes such as management's failure to follow established procedures, the importance of carrier input in route adjustments, and the use of work hour workload reports to demonstrate overburdened routes. He stresses the importance of collecting detailed carrier statements to showcase the negative impact of improper route adjustments on working conditions and employee well-being. He also emphasizes the use of strong language, such as "cease and desist," in grievance settlements to ensure compliance. Corey specifically draws attention to certain arbitration decisions and their implications for addressing 6-day counts. He points out the importance of the threshold of 8 hours and 15 minutes commonly used by arbitrators in determining whether routes are overburdened and emphasizes how the arbitrators addressed the issue of carrier input into route adjustments, how they dealt with management's attempts to use signatures on forms as proof of agreement, and how they addressed the inclusion of CCAs in remedy calculations. Corey stresses the need for thorough preparation, including the utilization of all available documentation and a strong understanding of the relevant handbook provisions. The episode concludes with an encouragement for listeners to utilize the provided resources, emphasizing the value of repetition and study in mastering the complexities of route adjustments and grievance procedures. Corey promises to provide more detailed information on 6-day counts in future episodes. Cites: https://fromatoarbitration.com/episodes-101-200/ http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode features a question-and-answer session with James Henry, NALC vice president and CLC presidential candidate. Henry begins with a detailed introduction outlining his extensive experience within the NALC and the Marine Corps, emphasizing his commitment to service and his dedication to representing letter carriers. The Q&A section covers a range of topics. Henry expresses his support for creating user-friendly online training resources for NALC members and for allowing members to livestream or record union meetings. He discusses his plans to improve member education and communication, stressing the importance of leading by example and fostering a more unified union. He addresses accusations of falling asleep during meetings, citing personal and family issues as contributing factors. He defends his relatively low level of political action committee (PAC) contributions by emphasizing his extensive involvement in political activities beyond financial contributions. He also explains his decision to remain relatively quiet in the lead-up to the convention. He states his decision to remain relatively quiet prior to the convention was a conscious choice to avoid engaging in negativity and to maintain a focus on integrity and positive action. Henry defends himself against allegations of misconduct from his early career, asserting his innocence and highlighting his subsequent successful career with the union and the Marine Corps. He details several instances where he actively worked to ensure fair treatment of letter carriers, highlighting two key arbitration cases which resulted in significant financial settlements for members who were victims of management misconduct. He details his role in reforming the NALC's dispute resolution process to improve accountability. He then discusses his plans for contract negotiations, emphasizing the need for transparency, accountability, and a more aggressive approach to bargaining with the USPS. He stresses the importance of keeping the negotiation process moving towards a timely resolution and avoiding the pitfalls of previous contract cycles. He addresses the need to mobilize rank and file members, outlining strategies to increase member engagement and participation, especially in voting and the grievance process. He expresses his opposition to using the grievance process for non-legitimate issues and strongly advocates for the use of cease-and-desist language in settlements. Finally, he discusses the outcome of the Renfroe charges at the convention, emphasizing his belief that the membership should have the final say on such matters. He comments on the challenges of navigating union politics, the importance of building a united front, and his vision for a stronger, more member-focused NALC. The interview concludes with a commitment to continue fighting for the rights and well-being of letter carriers. https://concernedlettercarriers.com/ http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This emergency Monday episode addresses rumors circulating about Corey Walton's experience with postal inspectors at the NALC convention. Walton clarifies that he was questioned for approximately 25 minutes, was not arrested or charged, and was not removed from the convention floor. He explains that the GoFundMe campaign initiated by JB was intended as a thank you for his podcast work, not for legal fees or personal gain, and clarifies that he never intended to accept any donations. Walton addresses criticism of the GoFundMe campaign on Reddit, refuting accusations of unethical behavior and emphasizing that listening to and donating to the podcast are entirely voluntary. He expresses his deep faith and his commitment to fighting for the city letter carriers, regardless of personal consequences. The episode continues with additional listener shout-outs and then shifts to discuss the implications of a letter from James Lloyd regarding the heat illness prevention program (HIPP) training. Walton criticizes Lloyd's assertion that HIPP training is at management's sole discretion, highlighting the contradiction between this statement and previous USPS communications emphasizing the requirement for annual HIPP training. He notes that Congress has also weighed in, emphasizing the need for improved heat safety standards within the USPS. Walton emphasizes the power of member action, highlighting how carrier grievances and public pressure have led the USPS to reconsider its approach to HIPP training. He encourages members to continue fighting for better safety and working conditions and to actively seek training on how to file effective grievances. He provides an update on plans for future podcasts, including a new series of episodes on 6-day counts and another series on the CLC website dedicated to educational content. He promotes the From A to Arbitration Community Facebook page. He ends by reiterating his unwavering commitment to fighting for the city letter carriers, and his plans to continue the podcast. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1218014406302643 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode is a heartfelt thank you to Corey Walton from JB, who expresses deep gratitude for Walton's dedication and work on the From A to Arbitration podcast. JB begins with updates on his personal life and recent baseball coaching experiences. He then transitions to expressing his appreciation for Walton's mentorship and support throughout his union career. JB details Walton's tireless efforts in educating and empowering letter carriers, highlighting his consistent willingness to help others and his dedication to fighting for better working conditions. He describes witnessing Walton's interactions with members in Boston, emphasizing his compassion, dedication, and ability to inspire. The core of the episode is a surprise announcement of a GoFundMe campaign to raise funds for Corey Walton. JB reveals that Walton has been investigated by postal inspectors due to his podcast and explains that the GoFundMe is intended as an expression of gratitude for Walton's unwavering commitment and sacrifices. He urges listeners to donate and share the GoFundMe link, emphasizing the importance of this gesture as a way of showing appreciation for Walton's work and of supporting the ongoing fight for better conditions within the NALC. JB concludes by reiterating his deep respect and admiration for Walton, expressing his inability to sleep since learning of the postal inspector's investigation, and emphasizing his desire to give something back for Walton's selfless contributions. He promotes upcoming educational podcasts (including a new series with himself and Corey for the CLC) and encourages members to continue their own efforts to improve their working conditions and hold both management and the union accountable. The episode ends with a strong call to action for listeners to participate in the GoFundMe and show their support for Corey Walton. https://gofund.me/858ddb84 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This post-convention episode of From A to Arbitration reflects on the NALC convention in Boston and looks ahead to future union activities. Corey begins by acknowledging the intensity of the convention and thanking several individuals for their support. He corrects a previous shout-out, noting that Corey Grott is not a listener or supporter of the podcast. He then shares numerous listener shout-outs, emphasizing the widespread support for the podcast and the ongoing fight for better working conditions. Corey analyzes the convention's outcomes, emphasizing that while the appeals on the Renfroe charges were not fully successful, the fact that the convention delegates were able to vote on them represents a significant victory for member empowerment and accountability. He notes the strong showing by the CLC and highlights Tyler Vasseur's powerful speech and the establishment's subsequent backlash, emphasizing the clear divide between the rank and file and the existing union leadership. Corey expresses his frustration with business agents who attempted to influence the vote, highlighting instances of strong-arming and intimidation tactics. He notes the hypocrisy of the union leadership's actions given their previous inaction on key issues like hip training and the ongoing issues with management's use of GPS data. He emphasizes the growing momentum of the CLC and other rank-and-file movements, anticipating significant changes in the union's leadership in 2026. Corey announces a future series of episodes on 6-day counts, promising to provide members with the tools and information needed to prepare and file grievances effectively. He also mentions upcoming podcast guests, including Mike Caref and the Angry Mailman. The Angry Mailman discusses the need for greater member participation at the local level and promotes his YouTube channel. Mike Caref analyzes the outcomes of the convention, focusing on the significant vote to hear the appeals and the implications for future union leadership. Caref highlights the importance of open bargaining and discusses the need for a stronger, more unified union, capable of effectively combating management abuses. He emphasizes the need for a more aggressive approach to grievance handling and contract negotiations. The episode concludes with Corey reiterating his commitment to fighting for the city letter carriers, emphasizing the importance of education and member engagement in building a stronger, more effective union. He promises to continue providing resources and support to members in the coming years and encourages continued participation in the ongoing reform efforts. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode is a recap of the fourth day of the NALC convention in Boston, focusing on the continued appeals hearings and the ongoing fallout from the handling of the Renfroe charges. Corey begins by announcing the "From A to Arbitration Shirt Day" will be Wednesday and clarifies information about the 50/50 raffle. He then shares several listener shout-outs, expressing gratitude for the ongoing support and highlighting the contributions of various members and branches. Corey details the second day of the appeals hearings, noting that the votes on the charges against Renfroe followed a similar pattern to the previous day, with a significant margin of votes in favor of upholding the guilty verdict on at least some of the charges. He expresses his frustration with business agents who attempted to influence the vote by threatening members with career repercussions. He states his intention to publicly name the offending individuals and calls for Article 10 charges to be filed against them. He recounts Gary Lang's successful confrontation of Renfroe, highlighting the comical aspect of Renfroe's inability to answer questions about his actions. He expresses approval of the fact that the delegates were ultimately able to hear and vote on the charges and emphasizes the importance of maintaining open bargaining and transparency within the NALC. Corey analyzes Renfroe's performance during the hearing on the DUI charge, noting his somber demeanor and the strategic use of the alcoholism mitigating factor. However, he points out Renfroe's lack of remorse and apology, emphasizing that this likely played a role in the significant number of delegates who voted against him despite the mitigating circumstances. He predicts that Renfroe will have more difficulty defending himself against the charges related to James Henry due to the lack of an alcoholism defense. Corey expresses further outrage over the fact that Renfroe hired an in-house counsel without the executive council's approval, highlighting this as an example of his disregard for the union's established processes and his blatant disregard for the union's constitution. He continues to emphasize that the current leadership of the NALC is failing to represent its members and that widespread change is necessary. He notes the growing momentum of the CLC movement and expresses confidence in their ability to secure victory in the upcoming election. The episode concludes with additional shout-outs, a discussion of the importance of member engagement, and a promise to provide daily updates from the convention. Corey reiterates his strong support for the CLC and his determination to fight for the city letter carriers. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode provides a recap of day three of the NALC convention in Boston, focusing on the appeals hearing for the Article 10 charges against President Renfroe. Corey begins with listener shout-outs and then discusses the CLC's activities, highlighting the large turnout at both the meet-and-greet and the roundtable discussion. He also mentions the real-time convention updates being provided on Discord. Corey details Gary Lang's confrontation with Renfroe regarding the S&DC MOU, praising Lang's effective questioning and exposure of Renfroe's actions. He suggests Lang should file Article 10 charges against Renfroe for violating the MOU. Corey then discusses the "From A to Arbitration Shirt Day" and notes that some branch leaders attempted to prevent members from wearing the shirts, highlighting the level of anxiety within the establishment. The account of the appeals hearing emphasizes the strong showing by the CLC and the passionate engagement of the delegates. Miller's presentation focused on the procedural errors made by Renfroe in attempting to prevent the appeals from being heard. Corey analyzes Renfroe's strategy during the hearing on the AWOL charge, noting his use of the alcoholism mitigating factor and his lack of remorse or apology. He highlights the fact that a significant portion of the delegates did not accept Renfroe's alcoholism defense, indicating a lack of support for his position. Corey anticipates the upcoming hearing on the charges relating to James Henry, predicting that Renfroe will have more difficulty defending himself as the alcoholism mitigating factor will be less relevant. He highlights the procedural irregularities and the potential for bias displayed during the hearings. He criticizes the actions of MBAs who attempted to influence the votes on the charges. Corey expresses optimism about the CLC's success in achieving its goals, emphasizing the growing support amongst the rank and file and their determination to bring about meaningful change in the union. The episode concludes with details on upcoming CLC events in Boston and a call for continued member engagement and action. Corey expresses excitement about the convention and reiterates his commitment to fighting for the city letter carriers. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode recaps the second day of the NALC convention in Boston, focusing on the CLC's activities and the overall atmosphere. Corey begins by highlighting the success of the CLC's meet and greet and roundtable events, both of which were extremely well-attended, demonstrating strong member support for the movement. He encourages listeners to follow the convention updates being provided on Discord. He then shares several shout-outs from listeners, thanking them for their support and highlighting their contributions to the union. Corey discusses the vote on the resolution to overturn Renfroe's decision to prevent the hearing of the appeals on the charges, emphasizing the significant margin of victory and the importance of this victory for member empowerment. He then introduces Jamie Partridge, who discusses the Rank and File Exchange event and the importance of open communication and coordinated action among rank-and-file members. Partridge highlights the need to share information and resources across branches, contrasting this with the current lack of transparency and communication from the national union leadership. He emphasizes the growing momentum within the rank and file for reform and change. Corey highlights the significance of the vote as an expression of member power. Corey shares additional listener shout-outs and then introduces a special guest, Mike Caref, who provides an update on the planned balloon release to honor the recently murdered Chicago letter carrier. He expresses frustration with the lack of action taken by the union to protect letter carriers from violence and advocates for greater resources and protection for letter carriers, including a dedicated postal police force. Corey introduces another special guest, Gary Lang, who discusses the events surrounding Renfroe's manipulation of the S&DC agreement. Lang expresses anger over Renfroe's actions and the lack of support from the business agent. The conversation delves into the power dynamics within the union, the challenges of combating management abuses, and the need for greater accountability among union leaders. Corey again emphasizes the need for a more militant union approach. Lang details his efforts to address the situation and his frustration with Renfroe's lack of response and apparent disregard for the issues faced by the branch. He expresses his intention to file charges against Renfroe. Corey introduces another guest, Charlie Miller, who provides a detailed analysis of the first day's events. The discussion covers the strategic maneuvering during the vote, the significance of the vote, and the importance of having the appeals heard by the convention delegates. Miller expresses his dissatisfaction with the executive council's handling of the situation and his strong support for the CLC's efforts to promote greater transparency and accountability. He also highlights the unusual security measures taken at the convention, suggesting this reflects the fear amongst the leadership towards the rank and file movement. Corey offers some additional details on upcoming convention events, including a CLC panel discussion and an after-hours meet-and-greet. He then shares some messages that demonstrate how management is still attempting to manipulate and control carriers through scanner data and unrealistic time expectations, especially concerning stationary events. Corey closes with an impassioned plea for the membership to remain united, actively resist management abuses, and support the ongoing efforts for reform within the NALC. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode is a recap of the first day of the NALC convention in Boston, focusing on the vote to overturn President Renfroe's decision to prevent appeals of the Article 10 charges from being heard. Corey begins by expressing condolences for the recent murder of a Chicago letter carrier and then emphasizes the success of the CLC in ensuring the appeals went before the convention delegates. He highlights the strong support shown for the motion to overturn Renfroe's ruling. Corey thanks several individuals for their assistance with the podcast and emphasizes the power of the membership to effect change. He reports the results of the vote (2221 yays, 1596 nays), highlighting the significant margin of victory. He announces a planned shout-out session for branches at the Westin hotel. He expresses gratitude for the positive response to the podcast and the convention shirts, emphasizing the importance of member solidarity and the need to challenge the status quo. He then introduces Jamie Partridge, who discusses his involvement in rank-and-file organizing efforts and promotes the upcoming Rank and File Exchange at the convention. Partridge emphasizes the need for greater transparency, stronger member engagement, and coordinated action to combat ongoing service reductions and management abuses. Next, Charlie Miller analyzes the events surrounding the vote and President Renfroe's attempt to block the appeals process, emphasizing the unprecedented nature of Renfroe's action. He details the parliamentary procedures used by the CLC to get their resolution approved. He explains why the membership's right to hear and decide on the charges should be upheld. Miller expresses disappointment with those executive council members who voted to protect Renfroe but praises those who stood up for the membership and voted to uphold the charges. He also highlights the strong support for the open bargaining resolution and discusses the issues to be addressed on Wednesday during a CLC panel discussion. Miller discusses the unusual security measures implemented at the convention and suggests this is a direct response to the growing rank-and-file movements. Corey concludes by encouraging listeners to attend the CLC events, emphasizing the importance of member participation in shaping the future of the NALC and highlighting the need for stronger, more accountable leadership. He promises daily podcast updates from Boston and encourages members to share their experiences and perspectives. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration focuses on the upcoming NALC convention in Boston and the ongoing fallout from the Renfroe charges. Corey begins by addressing the "From A to Arbitration Shirt Day" scheduling conflict and providing updates on the MDA raffle and t-shirt sales. He then reveals Butch Lau as his source for information about the TRAP memos and criticizes the memos' design, arguing they intentionally opened the door for increased management surveillance of carriers. Corey expresses anger over a letter from James Lloyd, which declares that heat illness prevention program (hip) training is not a contractual requirement and therefore not subject to grievance. He argues that this contradicts previous statements and actions by the USPS and highlights the ongoing falsification of hip training records. He then shares a memo from Manny Peralta highlighting the widespread falsification of hip training records and suggesting strategies for addressing this issue nationally. Corey criticizes Renfroe's response to the issue, noting his continued deflection and unwillingness to take responsibility. He then introduces Charlie Miller, who discusses Renfroe's letter attempting to prevent the appeals of the charges from being heard at the convention. Miller argues that Renfroe's interpretation of the constitution is incorrect and that the convention has the supreme authority to decide these appeals. He emphasizes the importance of allowing the membership to hear and decide on the charges. The discussion shifts to the issue of Renfroe's lack of accountability, his apparent use of the ADA and FMLA defenses inappropriately, and his failure to apologize for his actions. Miller details his strong support for James Henry's candidacy. Miller discusses the importance of transparency in contract negotiations and advocates for open bargaining. He notes that the current secrecy surrounding negotiations has created a climate of distrust among members, and it harms the ability to organize and mobilize around clear demands. He criticizes the lack of member involvement in recent contract negotiations. Corey introduces Mike Caref, who provides an update on the planned balloon release in honor of the murdered Chicago letter carrier and clarifies the circumstances surrounding the incident. They discuss the need for a stronger union presence and improved safety measures, including increased funding for postal police. Caref also discusses the upcoming CLC meet and greet and the importance of member mobilization at the convention. Corey then introduces Gary Lang, who details Renfroe's manipulation of the S&DC agreement to benefit a larger branch. Lang expresses frustration with the lack of response from both Renfroe and the business agent. He highlights the need for greater accountability within the union, and he mentions filing a charge against Renfroe. The discussion shifts to the importance of member education and self-advocacy. Corey and guests discuss the need for stronger union leadership, increased member engagement, and a renewed commitment to fighting for better working conditions and wages. The episode concludes with Corey reiterating his commitment to fighting for the city letter carriers and encouraging members to attend the convention and get involved in the ongoing reform efforts. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode features Tyler Vasseur and Ernest Gonzales from Build a Fighting NALC (BFN), a rank-and-file reform movement within the NALC. Coreys begin by discussing the creation of a new section on the From A to Arbitration website dedicated to unique LMOU provisions, highlighting the need for greater transparency and resource sharing within the union. They also clarify Corey's previous comments about the TRAP process, emphasizing that his criticism is directed at those who used their positions to harm carriers, not those who genuinely tried to protect them. Vasseur and Gonzales then outline BFN's plans for the upcoming NALC convention: canvassing, distributing flyers and buttons promoting open bargaining, and recruiting new members. They stress the importance of their movement in addressing widespread anger and frustration among letter carriers over low wages, poor working conditions, and lack of union support. They emphasize that BFN is not just a "young kids" movement, but a broad effort to reform the union and ensure better representation for all members. The discussion shifts to the open bargaining resolution, highlighting its growing support and the strategies BFN will employ to ensure its passage at the convention. Gonzales emphasizes the importance of mobilizing state associations to exert political pressure on Congress. He also discusses BFN's plans to establish itself as a formal caucus within the NALC after the convention, emphasizing the need for a more democratic and member-driven approach to union governance. Vasseur details the plans for a large in-person meeting during the convention and explains the upcoming GoFundMe efforts that successfully raised the funds needed for this event. The episode concludes with a reiteration of BFN's core principles and a call for increased member involvement and support. The team underscores the importance of challenging the status quo and holding union leadership accountable, and emphasize their determination to create a truly "fighting" NALC that effectively represents its members' interests. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/ https://www.fightingnalc.com/

This pre-convention episode of From A to Arbitration begins with condolences for the recent murder of a Chicago letter carrier and then focuses on preparing listeners for the upcoming NALC convention in Boston. Corey clarifies that "From A to Arbitration Shirt Day" will be Wednesday, not Thursday, due to scheduling conflicts with other events. He provides updates on the 50/50 raffle for MDA (now accepting Venmo payments in addition to Zelle), and the convention t-shirt sales, which are doing exceptionally well. He announces upcoming podcast guests, including Tyler Vasseur, John Poskin, Jason Leath, Charlie Miller, and a pre-convention episode from himself. Corey then reveals that Butch Lau, a retired postal worker, was his source for information about the "Trojan horse" nature of the TRAP memos, specifically regarding the use of GPS data for monitoring carriers. He criticizes the memos for allowing management to track and question carriers' activities without proper oversight, emphasizing the negative impact on morale and safety. He shares a humorous anecdote about his past collaboration with Butch on a safety initiative. Corey discusses the ongoing contract negotiations, expressing skepticism about Renfroe's claims of progress and highlighting the lack of transparency. He criticizes the delay in arbitration and the apparent manipulation of the process. He then shares several emails and scanner messages illustrating management's continued harassment of carriers regarding stationary events and office time, emphasizing management's focus on "making the numbers" at the expense of carrier well-being. Corey expresses his disappointment with the NALC leadership, particularly Renfroe, for its inaction on these issues. He then introduces a special guest, Mike Caref, who discusses the recent murder of a Chicago letter carrier and calls for greater protection of carriers. This segues into a discussion of the need for a stronger union presence, potentially including a postal police force, to address the increasing dangers faced by letter carriers. Caref also mentions a balloon release for the slain carrier and provides details about a CLC meet and greet in Boston. Corey then introduces another special guest, David Noble, who explains the parliamentary procedure of "calling the question" and its potential use to limit debate at the convention on key issues such as open bargaining and the Renfroe charges. Noble discusses concerns about the integrity of the election process. Next, Gary Lang, a branch president, shares his experience with the implementation of the S&DC agreement, detailing how it was manipulated by the national union for political gain at the expense of his branch and his members. This fuels Corey's ongoing critique of Renfroe's lack of integrity and leadership. The episode concludes with a discussion of the upcoming convention in Boston, the importance of member education and engagement, and a call for greater accountability from union leadership. Corey re-emphasizes the "slaughterhouse of failure" metaphor to describe Renfroe's tenure and his determination to help usher in a new era of fighting and transparency within the NALC. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on addressing the issue of management arbitrarily changing leave without pay (LWOP) requests to absent without leave (AWOL) and provides guidance on handling such situations. JB begins with a personal update, sharing his excitement about becoming a grandfather and reflecting on a successful baseball coaching season. He then expresses gratitude to those who have mentored and supported him in his union work, emphasizing the importance of paying it forward and sharing knowledge to strengthen the union. JB systematically explains the relevant contract provisions governing leave administration. He highlights the postal officials' responsibilities (ELM 511.2) and details the definition of AWOL from the F-21 handbook, emphasizing that AWOL requires a lack of notification or permission. He emphasizes the importance of obtaining and retaining documentation (IRM confirmations, 3971 forms, etc.) to prove proper notification and refute management's claims of AWOL. He also discusses the critical role of employee responsibility in submitting their own 3971 forms and carefully reviewing those generated by management. He provides specific details on using provisions within the ELM (sections 512, 513, 514) to counter management's claims and demonstrates how to argue that management acted arbitrarily and capriciously when changing LWOP requests to AWOL. JB emphasizes the importance of obtaining interviews with management to establish their position on record and the use of various postal service reports (IRM denied leave log, IRMS leave summary) to support grievances. He concludes by encouraging members to utilize the knowledge provided to strengthen their own advocacy efforts. The episode ends with announcements regarding upcoming podcast guests and a call for increased member participation in upcoming convention activities. Cites: https://fromatoarbitration.com/episodes-101-200/ http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode features an interview with Charlie Miller, a long-time NALC activist and former branch president, focusing on the appeals process for the Article 10 charges against President Renfroe. Miller begins by expressing condolences for the recent murder of a Chicago letter carrier. He then provides background on the Article 10 process, explaining the steps involved and highlighting the unprecedented nature of the charges against Renfroe. Miller emphasizes the importance of the NALC's internal processes for addressing misconduct and expresses his belief in the union's potential for positive change. He commends Chris Jackson and James Henry for their courage in bringing the charges and criticizes those who remained silent or withheld information out of self-interest. He also praises Mike Weir's integrity in conducting the investigation despite pressure. The discussion delves into the specifics of the appeals, with Miller reading the written appeals for each of the four charges. He highlights key points of contention and criticizes the panel's decision, particularly their acceptance of the ADA/FMLA defense, which he argues was not legitimately raised by Renfroe and misrepresented the application of these legal protections. He also criticizes the panel chair's ex parte communication with the NALC attorney and his failure to include the dissenting opinion in the final report. Miller details his strong support for James Henry's candidacy and highlights Henry's extensive experience and accomplishments within the NALC. He criticizes Renfroe's leadership, pointing to instances of dishonesty, neglect of duty, and creating a hostile work environment. He contrasts Renfroe's actions with Henry's track record of integrity, competence, and dedication to members. Miller concludes by discussing the importance of the upcoming convention, urging delegates to support the appeals and emphasizing the need for greater transparency and accountability within the union. He also promotes the CLC's efforts to reform the NALC and encourages members to get involved. The episode ends with a promotion of various NALC-related podcasts and a plea for greater member engagement and education. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration features Ron Speakman, host of the FedUp podcast, discussing various issues facing carriers. Speakman begins by emphasizing the importance of carrier safety and encouraging listeners to prioritize their well-being over management pressure, particularly regarding heat-related concerns and the use of GPS tracking devices in postal vehicles. He acknowledges the union's reluctance to address GPS tracking concerns through grievances. The conversation shifts to the role of union stewards and the importance of carrier self-advocacy. Speakman emphasizes the need for carriers to actively participate in documenting their experiences and gathering evidence, rather than solely relying on stewards or higher-level representation. He stresses the importance of detailed and accurate witness statements when filing grievances. The discussion then touches on the lack of union education and the resulting complacency among some members and union leadership. Speakman highlights the need for improved training and information dissemination, especially among smaller branches with limited resources. He advocates for a more proactive and aggressive union approach to combating management abuses and emphasizes the importance of prioritizing members' needs over internal politics or financial concerns. Speakman expresses his strong support for James Henry's candidacy for NALC president, highlighting Henry's leadership qualities, integrity, and experience. He criticizes the current NALC leadership for their inaction in addressing various workplace issues and their apparent deference to management. The conversation also touches on the importance of political action and the need for increased member contributions to the union's political action committee. Finally, Speakman mentions an upcoming episode focusing on alleged misconduct by a specific HR manager and discusses strategies for addressing such issues within the union, emphasizing the need for thorough documentation and a systematic approach to pursuing accountability. The episode concludes with a promotion of Speakman's own podcast, FedUp, and a reminder of the upcoming NALC convention. https://feduphq.com/ http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on non-compliance with grievance settlements within the NALC. Corey begins by announcing upcoming podcast guests and reminding listeners about the 50/50 raffle and convention t-shirt sales. He then criticizes Renfroe's collective bargaining update, highlighting the continued lack of progress and the secrecy surrounding negotiations. Corey discusses the importance of open bargaining and criticizes those who argue against it, highlighting the fact that contract negotiations have not always been conducted in secret. He then presents an analysis of various documents relevant to non-compliance grievances (M-01517, M-01492, M-01967), emphasizing the importance of timely compliance and the use of strong language in grievance settlements. He illustrates how these documents can be used to build strong cases, particularly those involving escalated monetary remedies for repeated violations. Several examples of pre-arbitration settlements and arbitration awards from Region 3 are reviewed to demonstrate effective strategies for achieving compliance and escalating remedies for non-compliance. The awards illustrate how arbitrators are willing to order significant financial penalties for management's repeated disregard of agreements. A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to analyzing a training document from management outlining strategies for addressing "street inactivity" (stationary events), highlighting the tactics management uses to track and discipline carriers. Corey expresses outrage at management's approach and at the union's failure to adequately address these issues, placing blame on Renfroe's leadership and the inaction of business agents. He emphasizes the importance of fighting back against management's tactics and educating members on how to respond. Corey also critiques the way the union handles grievances, noting that some cases have been sent to arbitration while others, even those of similar nature, have been inexplicably dismissed. The episode concludes with a call for stronger union action, emphasizing the need for effective training, assertive grievance filing, and a concerted effort to combat management's ongoing violations of the contract. A final interview with John Poskin, who discusses non-compliance from the perspective of a union steward, is included at the end. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode features an interview with Tyler Vasseur, a member of the Build a Fighting NALC (BFN) coordinating committee. Vasseur provides an update on the open bargaining resolution, highlighting its significant growth in support since a previous interview. He explains that the resolution's popularity stems from both widespread anger over inflation's impact on letter carrier wages and heightened expectations among union members due to recent successful contract campaigns in other sectors (Teamsters at UPS, UAW). Vasseur counters common arguments against open bargaining, citing historical examples of public actions in NALC and emphasizing that demands are not promises. He argues that a transparent contract campaign would mobilize members, build public support, and put pressure on USPS. He addresses concerns about potential negative consequences of open bargaining, such as a recession or Congressional backlash, emphasizing the need for a firm stance against concessions and building a strong, unified union. Vasseur then details BFN's plans for the upcoming NALC convention, outlining strategies to ensure the resolution passes, including pre-convention mobilization and engaging delegates. He explains BFN's longer-term goals, including establishing formal leadership structures and a comprehensive program to transform the NALC into a more democratic and member-focused organization. The core principles of BFN are outlined: open bargaining, a $30/hour starting wage, an end to mandatory overtime, a workers' wage for union officers, and the right to strike. The interview concludes with information about BFN's upcoming Zoom meeting and a shared commitment to building a stronger, more effective union. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/ https://www.fightingnalc.com/

This episode is a passionate rant about the NALC's failure to adequately address management's harassment and abuse of letter carriers. Corey expresses intense frustration with the current leadership, particularly President Renfroe, whom he accuses of cowardice and dishonesty. He criticizes Renfroe's dismissive attitude towards concerns about carrier surveillance via GPS data and stationary event monitoring, arguing that Renfroe's responses minimize the issue and fail to acknowledge the resulting bullying and intimidation. Corey shares numerous examples of management's actions, such as imposing arbitrary office time limits, issuing threatening scanner messages, and using GPS data to question carriers' activities without conducting proper street supervision. He uses Brother Gates' death as a prime example of management's disregard for carrier safety and the union's complicity in this disregard. A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to criticizing an email from a labor relations representative that Corey deems callous and dehumanizing. The email argues that the union shouldn't be responsible for carriers who disregard safety rules, using the example of a carrier being attacked by a dog for not carrying dog spray. Corey vehemently counters this argument, citing the union's responsibility under Article 14 to provide safe working conditions and its obligation under Article 16 to defend employees against unjust discipline. He argues that the email reveals management's lack of concern for carrier well-being. Corey expresses anger at the union's inaction on various issues (start time grievances, stationary events, etc.), blaming both the president and business agents for prioritizing self-preservation over member protection. He announces his intention to become a business agent and promises a more aggressive approach to defending carriers' rights. The episode closes with an impassioned plea for a return to a more militant and member-focused union. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode features Colin Smalley and Chris Doles from IFPTE, a large international union representing various federal and private sector workers. They discuss their upcoming union election and the campaign to shift the union towards a more assertive, member-focused approach. They highlight the challenges of representing a diverse range of federal employees across numerous agencies and the lack of unity and coordination among federal sector unions. The discussion draws parallels between their situation and the NALC, emphasizing the shared frustrations with unresponsive leadership and the limitations imposed by working within the federal system (lack of right to strike, congressional control over pay). Smalley and Doles explain that their union's focus is on improving working conditions, given the limited scope of their collective bargaining rights. They contrast their approach to union representation with the incumbent leadership, who they feel are too focused on maintaining relationships with political figures rather than fighting for members' interests. The conversation touches on the importance of rank-and-file education and mobilization, citing the successful strategies of unions like the Chicago Teachers Union. They discuss their plan to conduct a survey to better understand the needs of their members and provide more effective representation, highlighting the need for increased transparency, democracy, and direct action within the union. They emphasize their collaborative leadership approach and their hope for a renewed federal labor movement focused on unity and fighting for better working conditions and societal improvements. The episode concludes with plans to maintain contact and collaboration between the IFPTE and the NALC to advance these goals. https://www.ifpte.org/ http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration features a question-and-answer session with Mike Caref, a presidential candidate for the NALC. The interview, conducted in person, covers a wide range of topics. Caref begins by outlining his top five priorities as president: securing a strong national contract, addressing postal service mismanagement, improving internal union organization and communication, and implementing a standardized training program. He then discusses the NALC's food drive, criticizing the lack of national support and suggesting improvements to future campaigns. He explains his methods for maintaining connection with the workroom floor, highlighting accessibility and regular communication with branch leadership. The interview addresses Caref's decision to leave the CLC, explaining his reasons and emphasizing his commitment to democratic decision-making within the union. Caref details his differing approaches to contract negotiations and grievance handling compared to the current administration, advocating for increased use of arbitration and a more aggressive stance against management. He outlines plans to improve the grievance process, address issues like mandatory overtime, and combat management's use of electronic monitoring and unrealistic performance metrics. He discusses the importance of open bargaining and his willingness to explore constitutional amendments to increase accountability. Finally, Caref offers his opinions on his fellow candidates and reiterates his commitment to representing the interests of letter carriers and bringing about meaningful change within the NALC. The interview concludes with plans to continue the Q&A in a future episode. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This mid-week episode features an interview with James Brennan, a rural carrier candidate for Director of Steward Operations within the NRLCA. Brennan discusses the frustrations of rural carriers with their union's current leadership, drawing parallels to the situation within the NALC and the CLC movement. He highlights issues such as inadequate steward protection, insufficient training on new systems (like RRECS), management's abuse of overtime policies, and a reluctance to pursue arbitration. Brennan details the "United We Scan" ticket he's running on, outlining the candidates for president, vice president, and other positions. He explains the NRLCA's grievance process, which he criticizes for its inefficiency and aversion to arbitration. Brennan emphasizes the need for stronger union representation that actively defends carriers against management harassment related to stationary events, scanner monitoring, and workload manipulation. He also points out the significant pay cuts many rural carriers experienced due to the flawed implementation of the RRECS system. The conversation touches on the issue of CCAs performing rural carrier duties, and the need for better communication and collaboration between the NALC and NRLCA to address this issue. Brennan expresses hope for a more unified approach to combating management abuse across both crafts and emphasizes the importance of strong leadership that prioritizes the needs of carriers over internal politics or financial concerns. The interview concludes with a shared sentiment of frustration with current union leadership and a desire for positive change. https://www.nrlca.org/ http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey recounts a recent trip to Brooklyn, NY, highlighting positive interactions with local branch leadership. He then announces upcoming interviews with Mike Caref and James Henry (after the NALC convention). The core of the episode focuses on the NALC's handling of the Article 10 charges against President Renfroe. Corey expresses his discontent with the outcome, arguing that the panel's report was biased and omitted key evidence presented in the Weir report. He criticizes the panel for injecting ADA and FMLA defenses that were not raised by Renfroe or his attorney and points out inaccuracies regarding the testimony being under oath. An audio clip of a business agent, whose identity is protected, is played which reveals a pre-determined outcome in favor of Renfroe and a dismissive attitude towards Weir's investigative work. Corey then presents the unredacted panel report (23 pages), highlighting key findings and criticisms. Following that, he reads Chris Jackson's rebuttal (9 pages), which argues that the panel erred in several aspects of their judgment, particularly in granting Renfroe retroactive leniency and overlooking the significance of his actions even when sober. The remainder of the episode is devoted to highlighting numerous instances of management harassment and abuse of letter carriers through scanner messages, focusing on the imposition of unrealistic time constraints and the use of technology for intimidation. Corey emphasizes that this is all a result of the weak leadership provided by Renfroe and urges business agents and stewards to proactively defend their members, specifically providing templates and strategies to combat these tactics, especially during the summer heat. He closes with a passionate plea for stronger union leadership and a renewed commitment to fighting for the rights of city letter carriers. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration begins with the announcement that James Henry will be the CLC's presidential candidate. Corey expresses his surprise and positive impression of David Noble's previous interview and proposes a debate between Noble and Renfroe. He also announces an upcoming interview with Mike Caref. Corey then clarifies the events leading to James Henry's selection as the CLC's presidential candidate, refuting misinformation about the process and emphasizing that the CLC's choice was made after a unanimous recommendation. He uses the metaphor of "cancer" to describe the internal conflict that led to Mike Caref's departure from the CLC ticket and praises James Henry's qualifications and experience, emphasizing his record as an arbitrator. He contrasts Henry's strong stance against management's use of electronic monitoring with Renfroe's dismissive attitude, illustrated by Renfroe's letters downplaying concerns about carrier surveillance. The podcast continues with Corey sharing several examples of management's actions (e.g., imposing arbitrary time limits on tasks, using carrier data for discipline) that he believes demonstrate the failure of the current union leadership. He emphasizes the need for union leadership to fight back against these policies. Corey criticizes the ignorance and inaction of some business agents and RAAs, illustrating this with examples of poorly handled grievances and a lack of training on relevant issues. Finally, Corey presents a Zoom-recorded conversation with Nicholas Vafiades, a National Business Agent from Region 2, who explains his vote against the charges filed against President Renfroe. Vafiades argues that the Weir report was not the final word, that the charges were not substantial enough to warrant action before a full hearing, and that considering Renfroe's past DUI after he had sought treatment for alcoholism was inappropriate. The conversation touches on the importance of due process and the need for accountability within the NALC. Corey and Vafiades discuss the complexities of the situation, with both agreeing on the need for greater transparency and a stronger union response to management's actions. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode features a three-hour interview (Part 1) with David Noble, a candidate for NALC president. Noble provides a lengthy personal history, highlighting his long career as a letter carrier and union activist, including his close relationship with former NALC President Vince Sombrotto. He emphasizes his extensive experience handling grievances and his role in past contract negotiations. Noble discusses his lawsuit against the NALC, aiming to increase transparency and candidate access to communication channels with the membership. He criticizes the current NALC leadership, particularly Brian Renfroe, for failing to address contract violations and for the creation of the CCA classification, which he advocates eliminating. He proposes several key policy changes, including increasing arbitration access, enhancing member education through training and resources like podcasts, and reforming the grievance process to increase efficiency and accountability. He advocates for merging the NALC and the rural carriers' union and for open bargaining. He expresses a preference for adversarial grievance procedures and criticizes management's use of scanner data for disciplinary actions. Noble also clarifies past allegations against him and defends his long-term pursuit of legal actions against NALC officers, detailing specific instances of malfeasance. The interview ends with plans to continue in a future episode. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration covers several issues facing city letter carriers. Corey criticizes business agents for failing to educate members on issues like the 22-minute load time and 60-minute office time, arguing that management is exploiting these poorly communicated policies. He highlights one exemplary business agent who aggressively challenged management's tactics, contrasting him with another who blamed members for the grievance backlog. Corey discusses the dangers of wire cages being implemented, referencing handbook P0-502, which he argues doesn't apply to city carriers. He dissects a management document outlining a 60-minute office time plan, highlighting its flaws and urging carriers to request stewards during performance conversations. He also addresses management's use of PET and DOIS tools to manipulate office times, and criticizes locally generated forms used to document carrier inactivity. The podcast then features a lengthy critique of a bizarre article written by National's chief of staff, a non-union employee, which addresses workplace sexism and harassment but fails to mention the president's own misogynistic behavior. Corey expresses strong disagreement with the article's tone and message, emphasizing that only those who have worked as city carriers have the right to define the union's problems and advocate for its members. Finally, Corey announces upcoming interviews with several union officials. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a passionate call to action and a detailed discussion of ongoing issues within the union, focusing on the need for a new leadership ticket and financial support for the "Concerned Letter Carriers" (CLC) initiative. The episode opens with announcements of upcoming guests (David Noble, Nicholas Vafiades, and others) and previews a series of episodes focused on crucial issues. Corey immediately praises a shop steward, Joshua, for successfully obtaining financial compensation for his branch. He highlights several upcoming meetings (including a Zoom meeting on June 2nd with Tyler Vasseur) and urges members to get involved in the CLC movement and support it financially, stating the necessity of financial resources for the election effort. He likens the current union leadership to cicadas – making noise but ultimately being fleeting – and stresses that the CLC ticket is vital for change. Corey then addresses concerns that he's soliciting funds for himself. He clarifies that all donations will be directed toward the CLC ticket. He discusses a personal anecdote about his initial efforts, including a near-coop from the National union to support his efforts, and how the union thwarted his efforts. He uses this to emphasize the importance of members' support for the new CLC ticket. The episode then pivots to a detailed discussion of various ongoing problems, including the implementation of "one-hour office time," "22-minute load times," and "stationary events," arguing that these policies, implemented through memos, are unsafe and damaging to carriers, citing Corey's concern about worker safety. Corey asserts that these actions represent an abuse of power and a disregard for worker safety. He urges members to grieve such policies and to seek support from their business agents, and emphasizes the need for education regarding these issues. He directly blames the current union leadership for these issues, stating they are cowards and not doing their jobs. Corey encourages letter carriers to learn how to document these abuses for grievances and to file them. He stresses that carriers' safety is paramount. The episode ends with Corey providing specific financial information and details for members to donate to the CLC ticket, as well as information on an upcoming MDA car show. Corey expresses his deep commitment to the city letter carriers and his belief in a new, unified, and aggressive direction for the NALC. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/ https://concernedlettercarriers.com/

This podcast episode discusses a challenge issued by Nicholas Vafiades, a business agent, to debate positions live and unedited. Corey accepts and calls for other challengers. Corey expresses strong disapproval of the current union president, citing incompetence and a failure to address critical workplace issues. Specific criticisms include the president's refusal to take responsibility, inability to tell the truth, lack of remorse, and penchant for blaming others. Corey uses the case of Susie Miller, a shop steward whose son was unfairly treated by management and whose union failed to assist, as an example of the president's failures. The episode focuses on two major workplace issues: excessive "hour office time" and "stationary events," which management is using to discipline letter carriers based on scanner data. Corey argues these actions are violations of the contract and result from weak leadership and complicit business agents. Corey details instances of management's tactics, including measuring mail volume with tape measures, taking pictures and videos of carriers, and questioning them on the street. They provide guidance to letter carriers on how to respond to these actions, emphasizing the importance of requesting a shop steward and consistently responding "I was working" to any questions about time spent on tasks. Corey further explains how to file grievances based on violations of the M-39 handbook, specifically section 134 concerning street management and the requirement for supervisors to accompany carriers on their routes. The episode concludes with a call to action, urging letter carriers to educate themselves on their rights and prepare to fight back against management's actions. Corey also mentions plans for a new union ticket focused on representing the letter carriers' interests. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration focuses on the recent vote on charges against the union president and Corey's frustration with the union's leadership. Corey criticizes the current leadership for incompetence and a lack of transparency, arguing that they have not adequately represented the city letter carriers. The episode delves into the specifics of the vote, highlighting Corey's belief that the executive council's actions protect the president and diminish the letter carriers' concerns. He contends that the vote was a clear demonstration of a dismissive attitude toward the city letter carriers' issues. Corey notes that only one of the substantial charges against the president was upheld. He also calls out the executive council's decision not to allow the appeal of the "not guilty" vote to be heard at the convention, citing this as further evidence of their disregard for the letter carriers' concerns. He advocates for a new union leadership, emphasizing the importance of integrity, a history of fighting for the letter carriers' rights in the workplace, and the ability to delegate. Corey then discusses various workplace issues, including the use of memos containing unreasonable time limits for various tasks, the increasing frequency of "stationary events" and management's methods for monitoring carriers, and the inadequate support and education given to the letter carriers by their union leadership. Corey highlights the contrast between management's actions and the union's response, arguing that the union leadership's inaction has created a hostile and demoralizing work environment. He advocates for a more assertive and proactive approach to addressing these issues. He predicts future difficulties in contract negotiations based on the current leadership's approach and calls for a higher starting pay for letter carriers. He criticizes the current union leadership for being excessively compliant with management's demands and advocates for a more aggressive approach to contract negotiations, emphasizing the importance of understanding the current leadership's motives. The episode concludes with Corey reiterating his belief in the city letter carriers' strength and potential for positive change, and encouraging listeners to support a new leadership ticket that prioritizes the letter carriers' interests. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com

This episode of From A to Arbitration focuses on Publication 552, the Postal Service's policy on workplace harassment, and the Initial Management Inquiry Process (IMIP). Corey argues that management frequently fails to follow this policy, highlighting numerous cases where complaints were made but no IMIP was initiated. He emphasizes that Publication 552 outlines management's responsibility in responding to complaints of harassment and that failing to follow this policy is a violation. Corey explains how to use this policy to the letter carriers' advantage in arbitration by highlighting specific sections and phrases like "must" and "all," underscoring the breadth of management's responsibility. The episode offers practical advice on how to utilize this policy in formal and informal grievance procedures, emphasizing the importance of documenting all interactions and complaints to demonstrate repeated violations. Corey stresses that management rarely self-polices and that the union must take the lead in addressing these issues, arguing that if an IMIP is conducted, the union should still scrutinize its outcome and ask for all related documentation. The episode also touches on Corey's personal experiences and responses to criticism, emphasizing his commitment to the letter carriers and his stance against retribution. He concludes by reiterating his commitment to fighting for the letter carriers and encouraging them to fight for their rights, advocating for a change in leadership within the union that prioritizes their interests. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration covers a variety of topics, including fan mail, personal experiences, and a detailed analysis of a specific arbitration case. Corey initially apologizes for a technical issue that caused an earlier episode to be deleted. The main theme of the episode is Corey's frustration with the current union leadership and management's actions, focusing on the aggressive tactics used to pressure and control letter carriers. Corey specifically discusses the lack of accountability within the union and the disregard for letter carriers' rights. He highlights the need for education and advocacy to counter management's initiatives. He dedicates time to fan mail, including a response to a critical listener who accused him of making a homophobic remark. He uses the occasion to explain his personal experience with the difficulties of discussing his son's sexual orientation. His message emphasizes unconditional love and understanding. The episode then delves into the detailed analysis of an arbitration case where Corey highlights serious due process violations by management, including a concurring official who was heavily involved in the investigation and later acted as the formal step-a designee. Corey points out inconsistencies and inaccuracies in the manager's statements and actions as significant flaws in the arbitration process. He argues that the arbitrator's decision in this case is problematic due to these violations and the fact that the charges were not properly investigated or related to letter carrier duties. Corey further criticizes the union leadership for not adequately addressing these issues and for allegedly hiding information from the membership. He concludes by emphasizing the importance of Publication 552 (the Postal Service's policy on workplace harassment) in future arbitration efforts and previews the next episode dedicated to a detailed analysis of Publication 552. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration features a lengthy discussion on the "one-hour office time" policy and how letter carriers can fight back, delivered primarily by guest JB. The episode also touches upon personal matters (a baseball season and regional training) and upcoming guests (David Noble). JB's segment covers the importance of letter carriers' reporting requirements (M41) and how to document situations where more than eight hours are needed for route completion (using PS Form 3996 and 1571). He emphasizes the importance of maintaining accurate records (e.g., carrier daily performance reports, PS Form 1838c, route information card, and Doist reports) to prove to arbitrators that management's one-hour policy is unrealistic and unsupported by the current contract and handbooks. JB argues that the policy, if implemented, represents a violation of the contract and is a form of intimidation and harassment. He provides specific examples of how letter carriers' time is being violated and the need to collect documentation, including interviews and questionnaires, to demonstrate the issues. He advises that carriers request a detailed response from management, including the basis for the denial and instructions on how to proceed if mail volumes exceed the one-hour time frame. Key points include the documentation needed (e.g., PS Form 3996, curtailment slip) and that the projected time is not a contractual commitment but an estimation. Corey then discusses a recent arbitration case in Billings, Montana (Arbitrator Zane Lumley, case number C-36429), showcasing a precedent for fighting this type of policy, where the arbitrator sided with the union and ordered management to cease the practice, highlighting violations of the agreement in the process. The episode concludes with Corey re-emphasizing the importance of documentation, preparation, and union solidarity in challenging management's unreasonable expectations. Corey also announces a planned future episode dedicated to Publication 552 and the IMIP process. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration previews a forthcoming episode with guest JB, focusing on the "one-hour office time" policy. Corey discusses a recent Zoom meeting on "Building a Fighting NALC," highlighting the importance of unity and collective action within the union. Corey emphasizes the current precarious position of the NALC, critiquing the union leadership's perceived lack of leadership and engagement with the issues facing letter carriers on the workroom floor. He contrasts this with the need for a strong, proactive leadership that actively represents and mobilizes members. He connects this to the theme of love and unity within the union, suggesting that members must support each other despite disagreements. Corey discusses the importance of social media and existing podcasts like Fed Up as tools for members to engage in discussions about union issues. He critiques the current leadership, comparing them to a leader in a battlefield scene who refuses to fight. He suggests that the current leadership lacks the necessary understanding and experience with the practical day-to-day issues faced by letter carriers, resulting in management's aggressive and unsupported implementation of the one-hour office time policy. Corey also criticizes the union for not having a contract, and implies this weakness is contributing to the problems faced by letter carriers. He discusses the importance of proactive responses to management's actions, citing the need to collect and use evidence (like documented work hours, interviews, and questionnaires) to demonstrate the unreasonableness of management's one-hour policy. He encourages members to be vigilant and united in their approach. He also announces the upcoming episode's focus on Publication 552 and the IMIP process, as well as a planned episode analyzing a recent arbitration case Corey lost. He concludes by reiterating his love for the letter carriers and his commitment to fighting for their rights, advocating for a more unified and aggressive stance by the union. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/ https://www.fightingnalc.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a passionate critique of the current union leadership, specifically targeting the perceived inaction and lack of accountability of the union president and executive vice president. Corey expresses frustration with the union's handling of recent issues and the lack of support for letter carriers on the workroom floor. The episode opens with a quote from Lord Acton about the corrupting influence of power, directly referencing Corey's concerns about the union's leadership. Corey reviews the Weir Report, criticizing the lack of transparency surrounding the report's findings and the union's failure to inform members about these issues. He criticizes union leaders who knew about the report's content but did not act, arguing that they should be held accountable for dereliction of duty. He uses the example of shop steward Susie Miller, whose case highlighted the union's failure to support members. Corey further critiques the union's handling of issues regarding the implementation of the one-hour office time policy and the conflict this creates with carriers' contractual rights, their perceived lack of response to issues involving carrier harassment. Corey calls out the union's leadership for their perceived lack of resolve, cowardice, and inaction, stating that this environment empowers management to further exploit letter carriers. He decries the lack of support for letter carriers and the lack of protection against what he sees as management's harassment tactics. The episode continues with a discussion of the sorting and delivery centers (S&DCs) consolidation plans, where Corey supports a resolution from NALC Branch 3 to oppose the implementation. He advocates for a united front and calls for the mobilization of letter carriers to support the opposition. The episode further discusses a recent arbitration case win, highlighting the importance of thorough documentation in grievance cases, using Jason Crosby's work as an example of effective case preparation. He emphasizes the need for stewards to effectively investigate and document employee grievances. Corey also features a special guest, arbitrator Troy Swallow, who discusses the circumstances surrounding his removal from arbitration duties. The special guest is critical of the process and the actions of union leadership. Corey concludes with a call to action, reiterating his commitment to letter carriers and advocating for a unified, assertive stance against management's actions, emphasizing the need for a new leadership team that prioritizes the letter carriers' needs. He also previews future episodes on Publication 552 and the outcome of the recent arbitration case. A central theme is the importance of actively fighting against management's unreasonable practices through well-documented grievances and a unified front among the letter carriers. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration continues the discussion of the Weir Report, focusing on the "heroes" and "zeros" (or "studs" and "duds") within the union during the period covered by the report. Corey dissects the actions and reputations of various individuals, including former President Rolando, Paul Barner, Eddie Davidson, and others. Corey praises figures like Barner for stepping up during a period of crisis and criticizes others (like Rolando) for perceived failures to act or disseminate information properly, implicitly highlighting the lack of transparency within the union. Corey argues that those who knew of the president's issues but didn't inform members were in dereliction of their duties and should face accountability. He suggests that this lack of transparency and accountability significantly undermined the union's position. Corey links the discussion to Lord Acton's quote on the corrupting nature of power, asserting that the union's current leadership has become overly focused on maintaining their positions rather than representing the letter carriers' interests. He criticizes the union for hiding information from members, and implies this action may have influenced the outcome of the recent election. The episode concludes with a detailed discussion of specific charges within the Weir Report. This includes a significant segment examining a case of alleged misconduct against a union vice president (James Henry) where the union president allegedly did not meet with Henry to clear up rumors about him, despite Henry's attempts to schedule a meeting. Corey strongly condemns this behavior and argues that such failures to address allegations against union members damage the union's integrity. Corey previews a forthcoming episode on Publication 552 (the Postal Service's policy on workplace harassment) and a discussion of a past arbitration case loss. He also announces a Zoom meeting on building a "fighting NALC" and discusses the importance of unity among members to effectively address the ongoing issues within the union. The discussion ends by urging members to be ready for change and to mobilize in support of those representing the letter carriers effectively. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration details the first part of the Weir Report, an investigation into charges against union president Brian Renfroe. Corey, discusses the report's findings, focusing on the president's alleged absences from regional meetings, lack of preparation for contract negotiations, and a 2018 DUI. Walton begins by recounting his recent travel experiences and then presents the context of the Weir Report, stating that the report is a documented record of the investigation into charges against Renfroe and a crucial piece of information for the letter carriers. He emphasizes that the report is the letter carriers' property, given they funded the investigation, and argues that the union's refusal to provide it is a serious failure in transparency. He contrasts the current union's approach with previous practices, criticizing the current leaders' opaque handling of the situation. The episode extensively analyzes Renfro's alleged absences from regional wrap sessions and the subsequent disruption of training. Specific examples are given of Renfro's absences and the actions of other union officials during these instances, highlighting the chaotic management and unclear communication. The episode also dissects Renfroe's 2018 DUI, presenting supporting documentation like police reports and DMV records, demonstrating Renfroe's alleged violation of the union's driving policy and potentially exposing the union to legal liability. Corey points out Renfroe's alleged failure to disclose this incident to the union. Corey emphasizes the importance of the report, stressing that its disclosure is a fundamental right of the letter carriers. He also outlines the potential consequences of management's failure to address these issues and predicts potential retaliation against members who might challenge the current leadership. Corey ends by previewing the second part of the Weir Report for the next episode. The central themes are Corey's frustration with the union's perceived opacity, the documented failures of the union president, and the importance of members knowing the full context of the situation. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a highly critical assessment of the current union leadership, particularly the union president and executive vice president, and their handling of the DRT (Dispute Resolution Team) and other union matters. Corey begins by announcing upcoming episodes and a special guest. He emphasizes the importance of Publication 552 and the need to hold management accountable, citing examples of past and ongoing issues. A central theme is Corey's deep concern about the union's leadership, suggesting they may be either incompetent or actively working with management. He discusses several instances where union leadership appears to be failing to represent the letter carriers' interests, especially regarding the DRT. This includes a specific example of a letter from members expressing frustration over a new DRT policy that seems to favor management, potentially to the detriment of the union's ability to resolve grievances. Corey argues the union leadership is not upholding their duties, highlighting their inaction on critical issues like non-compliance with contractual agreements and the rampant use of memos (such as those establishing load time limits) to bully and harass letter carriers, especially those in smaller stations who are less aware of their rights. He presents examples and supporting documentation, including case file excerpts, to substantiate his claims. Corey criticizes the current leadership for what he perceives as inaction, citing their lack of response to member concerns and their failure to protect letter carriers from management's aggressive tactics and monitoring of their work. He condemns the lack of education and support for the letter carriers, and predicts trouble for the union's leadership in the upcoming election. The episode ends with Corey predicting a potential leadership shift in the union and urging members to remain active and informed. He emphasizes the need for members to unite and fight back, highlighting the importance of the upcoming Zoom meeting. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a passionate call for members to adopt a more aggressive stance against management and within the union, emphasizing the need for a change in leadership. Corey begins by apologizing for technical difficulties and immediately shifts to discussing recent arbitration cases. Corey critiques the union's handling of these cases, noting missed opportunities to make compelling arguments against management. He emphasizes the need to be proactive and assertive rather than passive, urging a "lions doing lion type shit" approach in all future union dealings. He contrasts the current leadership's style with a more forceful approach that he advocates for. A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to a discussion of the importance of procedural due process, using examples from specific arbitration cases to illustrate how management may be violating those processes. Corey meticulously details specific examples of how the investigating, requesting, and concurring officials were all involved in previous stages of the grievance procedure, arguing that this lack of independent review is a procedural violation that should be used in future cases. Corey then analyzes the memos and policies established by management, arguing that these documents explicitly state a commitment to workers' rights but are not being followed in practice. He points out instances where management has not adhered to this commitment in multiple documented grievances, highlighting the disconnection between policy and practice. He challenges the current leadership on their role in enabling these violations. He also responds to listener concerns about his personal financial handling of donations from shirt sales, assuring listeners that all proceeds go to designated charities. The episode ends by reiterating the need for a unified and assertive approach to challenging management and advocating for a new leadership ticket. Corey also previews future episodes, focusing on Publication 552 and possible audio from union meetings. Zumas C-10679 Rentfro C-01030 Morris C-36185 Bahakel C-28072 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode concludes the four-part "Memphis Mini-Series" on From A to Arbitration, focusing on the closing arguments and arbitrator's award in a complex arbitration case. Corey begins by summarizing the series' purpose, emphasizing the practical insights it provides into arbitration proceedings. He then previews upcoming episodes, detailing plans to dissect management's tactics and advocate aggressively against them. This theme of proactive and assertive action against management permeates the discussion. Walton highlights missed opportunities for powerful arguments in the recent arbitration cases, emphasizing procedural due process violations by management. He meticulously dissects the process, focusing on how the same individuals who initiated the discipline also participated in the grievance procedures, creating bias and jeopardizing the accused's rights. This includes specific instances where Corey criticized management's handling of information requests, lack of transparency in handling accusations, and their refusal to follow their own policies. The episode then focuses on the arbitrator's award, which partially upholds the union's position. He points out specific language in the award that he uses to demonstrate the union's success in highlighting management's failures and lack of compliance with their own procedures and policies. Corey critiques the overall handling of the case and calls out specific individuals in management for their inaction and lack of accountability. A significant portion is dedicated to explaining that the arbitrator's ruling was based on a recognition of ongoing systemic issues in the Memphis installation. The arbitrator's award included remedies like a conflict resolution committee to address the persistent problems. Corey strongly criticizes management's resistance to these measures and highlights the union's position that they've provided multiple avenues for resolution but were denied. The episode concludes with a powerful call to action, emphasizing the need for a unified and aggressive stance from the union against management's perceived abuses, as Corey vows to continue advocating for letter carriers, predicting a future of heightened conflict and demands for accountability, and previews future episodes dedicated to dissecting management's policies and tactics. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration continues the "Memphis Mini-Series," focusing on the formal step A meeting in an arbitration case. Corey begins by acknowledging a listener (Vorty) and discussing improvements to the podcast's production quality. He previews upcoming topics, including a special guest next week and a focus on aggressively challenging management, highlighting his belief that management is intentionally undermining the union and letter carriers. He emphasizes the importance of assertive advocacy in union dealings. The episode delves into the formal step A meeting's details, emphasizing the importance of careful preparation and thorough questioning of management's representatives. Walton criticizes the formal representative's handling of the case, highlighting instances where the representative's testimony contradicts evidence presented in the case file. He argues the representative was not adequately prepared for the meeting and thus acted in bad faith, and demonstrates the lack of independent investigation and corrective action by management. Walton stresses the importance of procedural due process, emphasizing the point that management's failures at earlier stages of the grievance process directly contributed to the ongoing issues and that a strong union advocate will seize upon these procedural flaws to discredit management's case. He demonstrates his mastery of the legal framework, citing specific articles and sections of the JCAM and relevant handbooks, and uses these to show how the current leadership is failing to fulfill its responsibilities. He argues that the current leadership is knowingly undermining the union, enabling a hostile work environment, and that this requires aggressive advocacy. The episode concludes with Corey highlighting a series of documented failures in management's handling of grievances and their reported lack of adherence to their own procedures and policies, illustrating how these failures affect union procedures and the union itself. He foreshadows further assertive action against management in future episodes, further reiterating his aggressive stance and highlighting the need for a unified front from the city letter carriers to counter management's actions. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration continues the "Memphis Mini-Series," focusing on the testimony of three witnesses in an arbitration case. Corey begins by thanking Cole for contributing to the podcast's intro music and discussing improvements to the audio quality. He then previews the upcoming topics, including a special guest next week and the continuation of the aggressive stance against management. The episode delves into the testimony of three witnesses in the Memphis arbitration case, highlighting Corey's tactics and concerns. The first witness, a station manager, is characterized as largely irrelevant, with little useful information being gleaned. The second witness, a supervisor allegedly targeted by the grievant, is presented as a problematic figure for Corey. Corey criticizes this witness, arguing that their testimony contradicts the case file evidence and, that their testimony lacks specifics and shows inconsistencies. The third witness, a 204B, is criticized for allegedly providing perjured testimony, which Corey presents as an example of the tactics management uses to undermine the union and the grievances of letter carriers. Corey expresses frustration that this witness was not forthcoming with information crucial to the case, highlighting how this type of deceptive testimony can jeopardize the union's position. The episode concludes with Corey emphasizing the need for careful documentation, thorough preparation, and assertiveness in dealing with these types of cases, including the need for the union advocate to know the case documents better than the management witnesses to overcome potential management bias. He emphasizes that the union's representatives should anticipate potential management tactics and have prepared responses to counter them. Corey foreshadows future episodes focused on the case's closing arguments, predicting a difficult but necessary fight for the union to win. He ends the episode with passionate calls to action, urging listeners to prepare for a potential battle against management and a new leadership direction for the NALC. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration introduces the "Memphis Mini-Series," focusing on a significant arbitration case involving a tragic incident at the Memphis post office. Corey sets the stage for a multi-part series covering the arbitration's testimony. He acknowledges potential listener boredom with contract cases but emphasizes that this case offers valuable insights into the arbitration process. The episode focuses primarily on the testimony of the first witness for management in the arbitration: a postal inspector. Walton details his approach to questioning the inspector, highlighting specific areas of concern and anticipated challenges. He foreshadows his intention to dissect the inspector's report and testimony meticulously, seeking inconsistencies and questionable aspects of the investigation. He explicitly criticizes the postal inspectors, arguing that they tend to favor management, and expresses a deeply cynical view of their role in arbitration. He details specific issues he plans to address during his cross-examination of the witness, including alleged inconsistencies in the report and discrepancies between the inspector's testimony and supporting documentation. He points out how the inspector's report contains unsubstantiated claims about the grievant's mental state, which he will challenge. He anticipates potential objections from management's advocates and expresses his intent to aggressively pursue these discrepancies and procedural errors throughout the testimony. Walton also discusses several other ongoing issues within the union, including the ongoing falsification of HIPP training and management's continued aggressive monitoring of letter carriers. These larger issues are used to frame his motivation in tackling the current leadership and highlighting Corey's frustration with their leadership's perceived inaction. The episode concludes with previews of upcoming episodes, specifically mentioning a special guest, the formal step A meeting, and Corey's closing arguments. The larger themes are Corey's aggressive stance against management, his critiques of the current leadership, and his dedication to protecting the letter carriers. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a highly critical and passionate discussion regarding the current state of the union, specifically focusing on the union's leadership and the challenges faced by letter carriers. Corey initially thanks a listener for providing the podcast's new intro music and addresses audio issues experienced in previous recordings. He then emphasizes his intent to focus on challenging management's tactics and policies, particularly in relation to recent arbitration cases. He states a commitment to a proactive and aggressive stance. Walton discusses significant concerns about the union's B-teams (grievance resolution teams) and the perceived lack of support from business agents and union leadership. He expresses dissatisfaction with the B-teams' decisions, blaming business agents for not adequately training and supporting the teams. He also critiques the union's handling of issues like the red-line policy and the lack of response to non-compliance with settlements. He delves into the issues surrounding the TIERAP route adjustment process and management's aggressive monitoring practices, such as using GPS data to track letter carriers, arguing that these actions constitute violations of the union contract. He calls out the union president for not adequately addressing these issues, calling him out for a perceived lack of leadership and a lack of concern for the workers' well-being, contrasting this with his prior advocacy for workers. The episode further addresses concerns regarding the handling of grievances, particularly untimely resolutions and non-compliance with previous arbitration awards, highlighting the significant problems and frustrations stemming from the current union leadership. He advocates for a more proactive and educated approach to grievance filing and resolution. Corey emphasizes the need for a change in leadership and a more assertive, militant approach within the union. He highlights his own personal experiences and criticisms of the current leadership, including personal criticisms and the lack of support he received as an advocate. Corey concludes with a fervent call to action, urging members to get involved and vote in the upcoming election for a new leadership that will represent the city letter carriers' interests. He emphasizes the need for a strong union and a proactive stance against management's abuses. He also discusses the importance of getting informed about current issues through resources like Discord and Reddit, alongside previews of upcoming episodes detailing the Memphis arbitration case's testimony. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is dedicated to providing detailed information and guidance on filing "Act of God" grievances. Corey emphasizes the importance of thorough preparation for these types of grievances, highlighting a series of cases where such grievances were successfully filed, particularly those spearheaded by guest JB. The episode begins by discussing Corey's approach to grievance advocacy. He reiterates his commitment to representing the letter carriers' interests, even when encountering criticism or resistance. He then delves into the specifics of "Act of God" grievances, outlining the criteria and requirements for successful claims. Corey provides a detailed breakdown of the relevant sections of the Employee Labor Relations Manual (ELM), specifically focusing on Section 519. He emphasizes the importance of documentation and evidence, including community disaster declarations, road closures, official warnings, and evidence that the disaster prevented a significant number of employees from reporting to work. He emphasizes that an "Act of God" event must be general in scope, affecting many workers, rather than personal issues that prevented individuals from showing up for work. This point is critical in distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate claims. Further, Corey stresses the need to document the extent to which the event actually impacted work performance and delivery. Corey explains the union's burden of proof and discusses examples of previous arbitration decisions related to "Acts of God" and the steps required to support a case, detailing what types of evidence to gather and how to present it to management, arbitrators, and the union. Corey also dives into what constitutes "reasonable diligence" in an "Act of God" scenario and stresses the importance of a carrier documenting their efforts to get to work. The episode concludes by providing detailed guidance on how to structure Act of God grievances, including examples of what to request in a formal step A meeting and what to include in your case file. Corey also provides the basic language of management's position on these types of grievances and details for advocates on how to challenge this argument. He reiterates his dedication to educating members and supporting their grievances. He ends by highlighting the importance of building a strong union. The overall message is about the importance of being prepared and organized in advocating for letter carriers, especially concerning weather-related absences and seeking proper administrative leave. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a passionate and highly critical discussion of the current state of the NALC, focusing on issues like the union's leadership, recent arbitration cases, and the need for a stronger advocacy approach. Corey begins by acknowledging listener feedback and addressing recent technical issues with the podcast's audio. He then outlines upcoming episodes dedicated to Act of God grievances and the ongoing issue of "hour office time." The episode features significant criticism of the NALC's leadership, which Corey characterizes as weak and unsupportive of the city letter carriers. He discusses the lack of proactive measures taken by the union leadership in response to various challenges, such as the ongoing falsification of hip training, and the significant workload issues facing some letter carriers. He directly criticizes the union president for a perceived lack of support and leadership, especially in responding to carrier concerns. Corey then tackles the issue of potential pre-arbitration settlements potentially weakening the union's position, and uses a specific example of a shop steward whose personal belongings were stolen from her case and then a pre-arbitration settlement was made to show the weakness of the union's current leadership, arguing it is inconsistent with the union's stated commitment to protecting its members. A substantial portion of the episode is dedicated to a detailed summary of a recent, significant arbitration case in Cleveland, Mississippi, including Corey's strategy and the arguments presented. He underscores the importance of a proactive approach to grievances, emphasizing that management often seeks to dismiss grievances by arguing that the problem was already resolved, but the underlying issues persist. The episode also showcases Corey's meticulous approach to gathering information, using examples from other episodes about past cases to illustrate how to address procedural issues and effectively challenge management's assertions in future cases. The episode concludes with a passionate call for a stronger, more proactive union, echoing the theme of a "ground-roots uprising" of letter carriers demanding better treatment and working conditions. He previews future episodes with specific topics like the hour office time, and expresses his belief that a significant leadership change within the union is necessary and inevitable. The overall message is a call for unity, aggressive advocacy, and a commitment to improving the working conditions for city letter carriers. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration features an interview with Tyler Vasseur, a shop steward from Minneapolis, focusing on activism within the union and strategies for stronger contract negotiations. Corey begins by acknowledging improvements to the podcast's sound quality and then previews upcoming topics, notably the "Act of God" grievance process and a revisit of the "hour office time" issue. The episode centers on Walton's interview with Vasseur, highlighting Vasseur's experience and perspectives on union activism, particularly regarding a recent branch resolution for an open bargaining strategy. Vasseur emphasizes the importance of public actions, like rallies, to strengthen the union's bargaining position, citing successful examples from other unions (e.g., the UAW, Teamsters). He argues that public awareness and pressure on management are crucial in achieving better contracts, contrasting this with Corey's own criticisms of current union leadership's approach, which he views as overly cautious and lacking in direct advocacy for workers' rights. The discussion extends to broader issues affecting the union, including the lack of transparency in negotiations and the perceived prioritization of financial concerns over members' needs and working conditions. Corey criticizes the current leadership's approach, arguing that a passive approach to management is detrimental and that a more confrontational stance is needed. The episode also includes listener feedback that prompted Corey to address the issue of union leadership potentially being in cahoots with management, expressing deep skepticism about the current leadership. Finally, the episode concludes with a preview of future episodes, including the continuation of the "Memphis Mini-Series" (focusing on arbitration testimony), an hour office time discussion, and potentially additional guest interviews or discussions about listener-submitted grievances. The overarching message is a fervent call for a change in union leadership and a more militant approach to negotiations and activism, with Corey emphasizing the importance of educating members and providing them with the tools to fight for their rights. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration focuses on a new "grievance of the month" – a case involving part-time flexible (PTF) employees and their potential conversion to full-time status. Corey begins by addressing listener feedback and announcing upcoming episodes on Act of God grievances and hour office time. The central topic is a detailed examination of the legal precedents and required documentation for PTF maximization grievances. Corey meticulously dissects the relevant sections of the contract, the Employee Labor Relations Manual (ELM), and the Joint Contract Administration Manual (JCAM) to explain the specific criteria for converting PTF employees to full-time status, including specific language and references from applicable documents such as Article 7.3c, M-01069, M-00913, and M-01398. A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to a breakdown of the required evidence. Corey emphasizes the importance of documentation, including detailed time records, leave requests, and other evidence supporting the PTF employee's regular work schedule over a six-month period. He also addresses potential management arguments, highlighting the importance of countering management's likely stance on issues like leave, holidays, and seasonal periods to avoid jeopardizing the PTF employee's conversion request. Corey also provides specific templates for grievance filing, including the structure of an issue statement, details of the necessary remedy, and a list of supporting documents to include in the case file. He then presents a specific arbitration award as a model for structuring such a grievance. The discussion extends to include broader issues affecting the union, such as Corey's frustration with the union's leadership for not adequately supporting PTF grievances and the general lack of protection for letter carriers from management's aggressive tactics and policies. He urges listeners to continue challenging management's actions and to prepare for future battles. The overall message is about the need for a new, more proactive approach from union leadership. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration presents the closing arguments in a 2020 arbitration case concerning the falsification of letter carrier clock rings. Corey begins by thanking Cole Billups for technical assistance in preparing the episode's audio. Corey details the case's background, emphasizing the importance of thorough case preparation. He highlights the significant role of his co-advocate, JB, and other witnesses in the case. The episode focuses on the legal arguments presented during the closing. Corey critiques management's defense, specifically criticizing their argument that no carrier was harmed by the clock ring falsification. He challenges management's stance on the status quo ante and the perceived lack of punitive remedies, arguing instead that the harm caused to the entire carrier unit constitutes a significant factor in the arbitrator's decision. The episode delves into Corey's strategy, outlining how he challenged management's arguments, emphasizing the importance of meticulous review of case files and contract language. This includes pointing out inconsistencies and omissions in management's presentation of the case. Corey cites specific examples of arguments presented (e.g., management's claims that clock ring alterations were for training purposes). He analyzes the case from the perspective of the arbitrator, indicating what the arbitrator may have considered in reaching a decision. Finally, the episode details the arbitrator's final decision, highlighting specific language used to understand the arbitrator's considerations. Walton emphasizes the importance of documenting management's violations. Corey's perspective throughout the episode is that union representatives need to proactively seek all available evidence and make compelling arguments based on the contract and relevant case law to challenge management. He then pivots to a discussion of upcoming episodes, previews future episodes, including a look at the "Act of God" grievance process and "hour office time" issues. The episode ends with a passionate and resolute call for a more militant approach by union members and leaders to challenge the status quo and advocate for letter carriers' rights. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration serves as a year-end review, offering a summary of the past year's activities and a preview of the upcoming year's focus. Corey expresses gratitude to Discord members for audio improvements, while acknowledging a technical difficulty during the recording. The episode begins by highlighting the podcast's impressive download figures and reiterates Walton's commitment to factual accuracy. He stresses the importance of the podcast's role in educating and informing letter carriers. The discussion then turns to a review of the ongoing arbitration cases, with particular focus on the ongoing charges against the union president. Corey critiques the union leadership's handling of these situations, citing instances of questionable tactics, lack of transparency, and potentially questionable behavior by union officials. He emphasizes the importance of the city letter carriers being placed first and foremost in union priorities, arguing that the current leadership has not done so. He directly criticizes the union's leaders for enabling what he perceives as problematic management behaviors, contrasting this with his own advocacy. The episode examines several incidents, including a private Christmas party attended by the postmaster general and other union officials, which Corey criticizes as an instance of potential favoritism and lack of transparency. Corey advocates for a stronger union stance, outlining plans to combat management tactics, particularly regarding the hour office time, redline policies, and stationary event issues. He emphasizes the union's obligation to protect its members from harassment and abuse and his plans to aggressively pursue these issues through the grievance process. Corey previews a series of episodes dedicated to the Memphis case's full testimony, focusing on the detailed questioning and challenges involved, and expresses his intention to help fellow advocates prepare for similar cases. The episode closes with a strong call to action, urging listeners to maintain their engagement and support a new, more militant union leadership. The episode's overarching themes are advocacy, holding leadership accountable, and the need for a more aggressive and united stance by the union against management's perceived abuses. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a closing argument and year-end review, covering both recent arbitration cases and broader union issues. Corey begins by thanking listeners and Discord members for their support, then previews upcoming topics (Act of God grievances and hour office time). The core of the episode centers on Corey's critical analysis of the union's handling of recent cases and a broader critique of union leadership. Corey emphasizes the importance of a proactive and militant approach to dealing with management, arguing that the current leadership has been too passive and has allowed management to successfully circumvent union processes. He presents detailed accounts of specific arbitration cases, including one where management tried to dismiss a grievance because it was not filed in accordance with a time frame, and another where a shop steward's purse was stolen and the union didn't adequately support her, emphasizing the need for better grievance procedures and protection of letter carriers. Crucially, he points out instances where management tried to manipulate the process and the union leadership either failed to act or acted in ways that didn't protect the workers. A significant portion is dedicated to criticizing the union's current approach to non-compliance with grievance settlements. Corey stresses the union's failure to enforce cease-and-desist orders as a major point of weakness. He critiques the lack of transparency within the union's leadership, particularly in negotiations. He notes the union's financial strength while advocating for the prioritization of the letter carriers' needs. He calls out the current leadership for perceived cowardice, poor handling of cases and a lack of support for their members. He links this critique to the notion of a "ground-roots uprising" as a means of driving change. Corey concludes with a passionate and militant call for a strong union and a change in leadership. He previews future episodes on additional grievances and emphasizes his commitment to continuing the podcast's focus on educating and empowering letter carriers to stand up to management. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a passionate discussion on the state of the NALC, focusing on the need for change and accountability within its leadership. Corey begins by acknowledging listener feedback and announcing plans for future episodes, notably on Act of God and hour office time grievances. The episode's central theme is a critique of the current union leadership, particularly their perceived lack of support for rank-and-file members, and potentially a lack of transparency in negotiations. Corey uses the metaphor of being "quietly devoured" by a powerful adversary to describe the union's position, arguing that the current leadership is not adequately representing the city letter carriers' needs. He accuses union leaders of enabling, or at least failing to address, abusive management behaviors and argues that this stems from a lack of sufficient understanding of the realities faced by letter carriers on the front lines. The episode includes a reading of a letter from a member expressing deep disappointment in the lack of representation for women in the union, and specifically black women, in positions of authority and decision-making. Corey uses the letter to underscore a larger issue of inclusivity and fairness within the union, highlighting potential discrimination. The discussion also delves into Corey's frustrations with the union's perceived inaction on various issues, including a specific case concerning the falsification of employee records, highlighting the perceived lack of action against bad management practices and the union's potentially complicit role in enabling these behaviors. A call for a more militant and transparent approach is repeated throughout, emphasizing the need for a new leadership regime committed to the interests of the city letter carriers. The episode concludes with additional previews of future episodes, including Corey's closing argument in a previous arbitration case and a deeper dive into other grievances, showcasing Corey's resolute advocacy for the letter carriers. Corey's criticism of the union is rooted in his desire for a more militant and transparent union, one that truly represents the needs of the rank and file rather than the interests of its leaders or those of postal management. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a passionate and critical review of the current state of the NALC, focusing on Corey's frustration with union leadership and management. Corey apologizes for the lack of intro music due to a recent move and technical difficulties. The episode begins with a discussion of a recent article in the postal record, and a cease and desist argument that was raised by the B team. Corey challenges the union's leadership for allowing this watered-down language (instead of a strong cease and desist), which he argues places the union at a disadvantage. He critiques the union's leadership for being too passive and compliant with management, arguing that this is a direct detriment to the letter carriers. The episode further dissects the problems with the current grievance processes, including cases of alleged noncompliance with arbitration decisions and Corey's dissatisfaction with the lack of consistent support from union leadership. He expresses deep concern about the ongoing harm to letter carriers, who he feels are being neglected and abused by the union's current leadership. Corey highlights several examples of grievances and arbitration cases. He critiques the handling of a case of falsified clock rings, emphasizing that management's failure to take responsibility and the union's acquiescence to this. This is a critical theme of Corey's discussion – Corey points to examples where he believes management violated the union contract but the union failed to adequately address the issue. Further, he addresses the issue of understaffing and overwork, noting that the union leadership hasn't addressed these problems effectively. He then shares a story and critiques management's actions, stating that management is likely intentionally obstructing carriers from successfully completing their tasks, which undermines the overall work structure. Corey concludes with a passionate call for change, highlighting the need for a militant and actively engaged union leadership. He emphasizes the need for a union that protects its members' rights and fights for better working conditions. The episode closes with Corey presenting several specific grievances and the need for organized and thorough documentation. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a passionate discussion on the state of the NALC, focusing on the need for change, particularly within the union's leadership. Corey begins by acknowledging technical difficulties with the audio and previews upcoming episodes focused on specific arbitration cases. The episode centers on Corey's frustration with the union's current leadership and their handling of various issues, notably the lack of support for letter carriers. He criticizes the union for allowing management to dictate terms and for not adequately representing members' concerns, notably those relating to grievances that Corey feels have been handled poorly. Corey utilizes specific examples of recent arbitration cases and grievance settlements to highlight the issues with the union's current leadership, particularly the perceived cowardice and a lack of proactive action against management's tactics. He argues that the union's current approach to negotiations, which he frames as overly cautious, is ultimately detrimental to letter carriers. He advocates for a more militant and aggressive approach, calling on union leaders and members to prioritize the needs of city letter carriers. This includes demands for more proactive, educated stewards and business agents who understand the issues facing their members. He critiques a perceived prioritization of money-saving measures above the rights and needs of the carriers, arguing that a strong union would aggressively pursue all reasonable grievances. Corey presents a series of examples, like a pre-arbitration settlement that doesn't include cease and desist language, to support his claim that the union has allowed itself to be manipulated into less favorable terms. He uses the "art of war" metaphor to illustrate the current leadership's failure to understand and confront the enemy (management) effectively. He also highlights instances where union leadership has not adequately investigated or supported members facing harassment or abuse, claiming these are further indicators of a weak and ineffectual union. The episode concludes with a call for a new, militant union, urging the audience to vote for leaders who will fight for the letter carriers' rights, and previews the upcoming episode on Act of God grievances. A key theme throughout is Corey's deep dissatisfaction with the current state of the union and his advocacy for a fundamental change in leadership and strategy. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a highly critical and passionate discussion of Corey's frustrations with the current state of the NALC, particularly its leadership and handling of grievances. Corey begins by acknowledging technical difficulties and previews upcoming episodes on emergency placement cases and clock ring falsification. The episode's core theme is Corey's profound dissatisfaction with the union's leadership, which he characterizes as cowardly and lacking in proactive measures against management's increasingly aggressive tactics. He uses a metaphor from the movie "300" to describe the current situation. He asserts that the union is being quietly devoured by management, highlighting instances of the union leadership allowing management to violate contracts with impunity. He criticizes this as a double standard, where management is protected and letter carriers are not. The episode features a significant critique of the union's B-team decisions. Corey dissects several B-team decisions and pre-arbitration settlements that, in his opinion, significantly favor management, accusing the union leadership of acquiescing to management's demands to avoid costly arbitrations. He calls this out as a direct violation of the interests of the letter carriers. He accuses the leadership of being overly concerned with preserving the union's financial well-being instead of actively defending its members. He offers numerous examples from recent arbitration cases to illustrate his points, emphasizing instances of management lying or obfuscating information, and the lack of a unified or militant stance from the union's leadership. Corey's frustration is palpable throughout, and he repeatedly urges a shift in the union's approach to become more aggressive and protective of its members' rights. He concludes by announcing future episodes dedicated to specific topics and expressing his strong desire for a militant union, one that is actively fighting for its members' interests. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a passionate and critical assessment of the current state of the NALC, focusing on Corey's frustration with union leadership and management tactics. Corey begins by thanking Ron Speakman for a recent podcast appearance and previews upcoming episodes on emergency placement cases and the falsification of time records. The central theme of the episode is a strong critique of the union's leadership for perceived inaction and poor advocacy, particularly regarding management's implementation of policies. Corey argues that management is more effectively communicating and strategizing their positions, while the union leadership is not adequately preparing members to fight back. He specifically criticizes the union's handling of issues like hour office time, stationary events, load times, and the lack of a unified or aggressive stance on those grievances. Corey highlights several documented instances of management violating the contract and the union's seemingly passive response. He argues that management's actions are not only detrimental to the letter carriers but are also a calculated strategy to undermine the union's position, comparing the current situation to the "frog in the boiling water" analogy. He emphasizes how the union has allowed management to successfully manipulate and condition the workforce into accepting these practices by not fighting back early enough. The episode concludes with a call for more militant action from the union leadership. Corey implores members to support a new leadership team capable of effectively opposing management and advocating for the city letter carriers. He stresses the need for a proactive approach and for members to educate themselves on their rights and how to challenge management's actions. He highlights recent arbitration decisions that support the union's position and provides specifics on how to structure future grievances to effectively challenge management's tactics and policies, highlighting the importance of education and proactively seeking out ways to stand against management's abuses. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a passionate and critical analysis of the NALC's current leadership and its handling of grievances. Corey begins by apologizing for the abbreviated format due to a technical issue, and previews upcoming episodes on emergency placement and clock ring falsification. The episode pivots to a discussion of the perceived double standard between management's treatment of letter carriers and the union's response to documented grievances. Corey argues that the union contract, while intending to protect carriers, inadvertently safeguards management from accountability in many situations. He highlights a lack of proactive measures and education from union leadership, leading to a situation where carriers are being bullied. He dissects specific examples of grievances, emphasizing how the union's current approach fails to adequately address instances of management misconduct. Corey argues that management often attempts to dismiss grievances by claiming no financial harm occurred, contrasting this with the often significant and lasting harm faced by letter carriers due to unfair practices, intimidation, and harassment. The episode's core theme is a call for the union to adopt a more aggressive and militant stance against management's abuse of power. He criticizes the union's leaders for complacency and for not adequately educating letter carriers on their rights and how to challenge management's actions. He uses specific examples like the falsification of time records (including heat illness training) and the implementation of new policies (like the "hour office time" rule) to demonstrate how management is gaining the upper hand. Corey presents several recent B-team decisions as evidence of the union's lack of assertiveness, lamenting the watered-down language that fails to adequately hold management accountable. He contrasts this with how he, as a representative, would approach these situations, advocating for a more militant and assertive strategy. He urges listeners to prepare for future challenges by educating themselves on their rights, using past arbitration decisions as a resource. The episode concludes with a passionate call to action, urging members to support a new union leadership more committed to the needs of the city letter carriers. He emphasizes the need for a militant union with leaders who will proactively address management's abuses and actively fight for the protection of their members. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a passionate discussion on Corey's frustration with the NALC's leadership and management's tactics, primarily concerning the curtailment of mail to force carriers into undertime status. Corey begins by thanking Ron Speakman and previews upcoming episodes. The episode's core focus is Corey's criticism of management's tactics and the union's perceived lack of effective response. Corey argues that management is strategically using mail curtailment and route adjustments to create undertime situations for carriers, which is a violation of the contract, and that the union's leadership isn't adequately defending its members. He presents several specific examples from B-team decisions and arbitration cases where carriers were instructed to curtail mail, forcing them into undertime. The episode includes detailed analyses of contractual provisions (like Article 41), arbitration decisions, and the lack of clear guidance and proactive measures from the union. Corey highlights instances where he believes management is deliberately trying to circumvent the contract to avoid overtime pay, and the union has allowed this to happen. A significant portion is dedicated to dissecting how management's actions violate specific articles and sections of the contract. Corey presents multiple examples from arbitration decisions to support his argument that management has violated their obligations, including the lack of notice for adjustments, the use of inaccurate workload projections, and the failure of local officials to adequately support their members in the face of these situations. Corey argues that the union's inadequate response, relying on general language rather than precise cease-and-desist orders, has left carriers vulnerable. The episode concludes with a passionate plea for a more militant approach within the union, especially from the business agents' offices. Corey expresses dissatisfaction with a lack of education and proactive measures from the union's leadership and emphasizes his belief in a more aggressive, proactive strategy. Corey foreshadows future episodes by outlining topics like the grievances of the month and the need to hold management accountable, while simultaneously highlighting his belief in the necessity for a stronger and more unified union. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a passionate discussion on Corey's frustration with management tactics and the union's response. Corey begins by acknowledging a recent technical difficulty and previews upcoming episodes on emergency placement and time record falsification grievances. The episode's core focus is on Corey's critique of the NALC leadership for perceived inaction and insufficient support for letter carriers. He argues that management is strategically using certain processes, like 1838Cs (efficiency counts), to intimidate carriers and unfairly exert control over their work schedules. He also criticizes management for not adequately preparing the union to handle these tactics. He discusses the importance of carriers understanding their rights concerning 1838Cs and the need for union representatives to proactively educate and support their members against potential abuses of power. Corey presents several examples from various arbitration cases. He cites instances where management may have violated the contract but that the union didn't adequately respond, highlighting the importance of having clear and specific arguments in grievances and arbitrations. He emphasizes the need for the union to proactively challenge management's actions by citing relevant contract language, precedents, and past arbitration awards as a means of bolstering the union's position. A central theme of the episode is Corey's dissatisfaction with the union's passive response to management's aggressive tactics. He advocates for a more proactive, educated, and unified response from the union to hold management accountable. Corey stresses the importance of a stronger union stance and highlights the need for immediate action to counteract management's perceived abuses. The episode ends with a preview of future episodes and a call to action, encouraging listeners to educate themselves and prepare for future challenges. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a passionate and critical discussion of the NALC's leadership and its handling of recent issues, particularly Corey's grievances regarding the union's current approach. Corey begins by acknowledging a technical difficulty and previews the focus on specific arbitration cases. The central theme is a critique of the current union leadership for perceived inaction, cronyism, and a failure to adequately represent the interests of letter carriers. Corey argues that the current leadership is failing to protect members from increasingly aggressive management tactics. He presents numerous examples of situations where management is circumventing the contract, including the intentional falsification of records, inconsistent disciplinary actions, and a general lack of transparency in negotiations. He accuses the current leadership of potentially colluding with management to favor their own interests over the membership. The episode delves into specific grievances, including Corey's own frustration with the way management has handled situations, as well as grievances raised by other members (which Corey relays). The discussion delves into the perceived unfairness of the current system where management can act without facing serious repercussions. Corey emphasizes that the union's current leadership appears uninterested in addressing these issues, using examples from recent arbitration decisions to highlight the union's apparent failures and what he sees as management's successful use of certain tactics. He criticizes the union's response to these tactics, noting that the union often chooses to avoid direct confrontation with management in order to avoid possible negative consequences. He also discusses how the union's leadership might be losing touch with the realities faced by letter carriers on the ground. The episode closes with a passionate call for change within the union and a stronger advocate role, urging listeners to consider what they want from their leadership in the upcoming elections. Corey highlights the importance of supporting a more militant union leadership, urging members to be vigilant about the union's actions and advocating for leaders who understand the needs and concerns of city letter carriers. He previews future episodes on additional grievance topics, expressing a commitment to continue educating and empowering the membership. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a passionate and critical assessment of the current NALC leadership's approach to grievances, especially regarding management tactics and the perceived lack of member support. Corey begins by addressing technical difficulties and previews upcoming episodes on emergency placement and clock-ring falsification cases. The episode's central theme revolves around Corey's criticism of the union's leadership for their perceived passivity and lack of proactive advocacy against management tactics. Corey argues that management is successfully manipulating the system, citing examples like the use of "hour office time" policies and their aggressive approach to route adjustments, often placing the burden of proof on carriers. He dissects several specific recent arbitration cases, and, critically, analyzes how these cases demonstrate the union's failures in responding to management's violations of the contract. Corey's analysis targets both management and union tactics, emphasizing how the union's perceived reluctance to challenge management aggressively through the formal grievance process has left carriers vulnerable to abuse. Corey critiques specific examples of management behavior, such as the use of "locally generated forms," and the seemingly intentional creation of undertime situations in order to bypass contractual obligations. He analyzes the lack of consistency in the application of discipline for carriers, contrasting it with the seemingly lenient treatment of managers who continually violate the contract, illustrating a critical double standard. Corey emphasizes the need for a more proactive and militant approach from union representatives, urging them to defend their members and hold management accountable. He calls on the audience to understand the strategic nature of management's tactics and to educate themselves about their rights and responsibilities to challenge these actions. The episode ends with Corey sharing recent examples of successful grievances and arbitration cases and emphasizing the importance of maintaining a unified and aggressive stance against management. He again stresses the need for new leadership within the union, suggesting that a stronger and more proactive union would address the issues more effectively, particularly related to the falsification of heat illness training records. The overall message is a call for change and a more militant approach by the union to protect letter carriers from perceived abuses. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a passionate discussion on Corey's concerns about the NALC's current leadership and management's tactics, particularly concerning a new tool called CDPOM (City Delivery Pivoting Opportunity Model). Corey begins by acknowledging a technical issue and previews upcoming episodes on emergency placement cases. The episode centers on Corey's critique of management's use of CDPOM, which he claims is a tool designed to create undertime situations for carriers and bypass contractual obligations. He contends that the tool is based on historical data, and management's use of it is a tactic to manipulate carriers' workload without proper consideration for the actual conditions of each route. Corey explicitly argues that the union's current approach is inadequate in countering management's tactics and lacks the necessary proactive measures to defend letter carriers. He stresses that the union leadership has failed to adequately educate the members on how to fight back against this new tool. He analyzes several precedents from past arbitration cases (particularly episode 52, which is highlighted as a crucial resource) to illustrate how similar issues were resolved. The episode showcases his knowledge of relevant contract provisions and arbitration precedents, demonstrating his strategy for how to challenge management's use of CDPOM. He highlights the lack of provisions in the contract protecting carriers from manipulation and pressure, and that the union's failure to address these systemic issues has resulted in carriers being vulnerable. The episode's theme is a call for a stronger, more militant, and educated union. Corey urges the audience to educate themselves on their rights and the relevant contract provisions (such as Article 41 and M-01769) to be able to counter management's aggressive actions. He emphasizes that the union leadership needs to step up and advocate for its members proactively. Corey concludes by emphasizing his commitment to educating and empowering letter carriers, offering to share resources for challenging management's tactics. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration focuses on the nuances of grieving a decision letter versus a notice of proposed removal in NALC cases, emphasizing the importance of procedural knowledge. Corey starts by acknowledging technical difficulties and previews upcoming episodes on emergency placement and time-record falsification issues. The core of the episode is a detailed analysis of the timeliness of grievances, examining the difference between a "notice of proposed removal" (a preliminary action) and a "letter of decision" (the final action). Corey meticulously dissects contract provisions (especially Article 15 and related sections of the JCAM) to argue that a grievance on a decision letter is considered timely, even if a notice of proposed removal wasn't grieved within the 14-day window. He contrasts this with the union's and management's positions on this issue, citing specific examples of past arbitration decisions that support his position, particularly those in contrast to the APWU's precedent-setting agreement. He emphasizes that this approach is critical because management will frequently argue for untimeliness of grievances if a proposed notice, rather than a decision letter, is grieved. The episode highlights the importance of understanding due process and Corey's insistence on challenging management's procedural arguments at every level. Corey advocates for a more aggressive approach to grievance processing, urging members to demand detailed charges and a thorough investigation before disciplinary action takes place. He concludes by emphasizing the critical importance of union members knowing their rights and the union representatives' need to protect these rights at every level. Corey predicts future challenges and emphasizes the need for proactive, informed members, and promises to continue this type of advocacy in future episodes. The overall message is a strong call to action emphasizing the need for a proactive and knowledgeable union membership to combat management's potential abuse of power. M-00939 M-01137 Britton C-12205 Reeves C-24356 Duda C-20825 'In dubio pro reo' Doubts must go in favor of the accused http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration centers on Corey's critique of management's use of data-driven tools to monitor and manage letter carriers, particularly concerning a new system called CDPOM (City Delivery Pivoting Opportunity Model). Corey begins by acknowledging recent listener feedback and previews future episodes on emergency placement cases. The episode's core focus is Corey's contention that management is using tools like CDPOM, which relies on historical data from DOIS (Delivery Operations Information System) and PET (Performance Enhancement Tool) to project and manage carrier workloads, in an overly aggressive manner that disregards carriers' rights. Corey emphasizes the perceived double standard: while carriers face discipline for deviations from projected times, management isn't held accountable for potential errors or inconsistencies in those projections. He argues that these practices create a hostile work environment. The episode provides a deep dive into several arbitration precedents. Corey meticulously dissects contractual provisions (specifically Article 41 and relevant sections of the JCAM and the M-39 handbook) to emphasize how these tools violate established contract language regarding workload, leaving carriers with little recourse but to grieve such actions. He also discusses how management is using existing systems (like 1838C mail counts) as a means of intimidation and control, rather than for fair evaluation. This highlights Corey's concern that the union is allowing these practices to go unchecked. He further decries the union leadership's perceived lack of engagement and education regarding these issues, and Corey's dissatisfaction with the current leadership's response in proactively defending letter carriers. The discussion extends to the general issue of the NALC's handling of grievances and the broader need for stronger advocacy at every level of the union. Corey emphasizes the importance of proactive grievance filing and challenges members to be more vigilant about their rights and to demand a more assertive leadership position. He concludes by highlighting the need for a more assertive and aggressive stance within the union and previews upcoming episodes on this subject and others. Clarke C-28556 a&b http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a passionate critique of the NALC's leadership and management tactics, focusing on Corey's frustration with the perceived lack of support for letter carriers. Corey begins by acknowledging technical difficulties and previews upcoming episodes on emergency placement cases and time-record falsification. The episode is centered around Corey's criticism of current union leadership for perceived inaction and failure to adequately address grievances and protect letter carriers. He dissects specific recent arbitration cases and the union's responses, highlighting instances where management successfully circumvented the grievance process and the lack of proactive, aggressive support from union leadership. Corey analyzes the handling of disciplinary actions, arguing that the current procedures favor management by allowing them to issue proposed removals and then mitigate them without substantial repercussions. He presents examples where similar situations were successfully challenged, but the current leadership doesn't seem to support such action, emphasizing the lack of protection for letter carriers who are not adequately educated or supported in the grievance process. The episode also examines the issue of a lack of proactive education from the union regarding current management strategies, emphasizing the union's failures to inform or instruct members on how to counter management tactics. Corey concludes by urging listeners to maintain vigilance and seek education to overcome these challenges, predicting a future of ongoing struggles if the current leadership doesn't change. He also emphasizes the importance of a more militant union leadership. He reiterates his commitment to the city letter carrier, outlining his plans to continue advocating for their rights and to provide resources, like grievance templates and arbitration precedents, to support their efforts. The overall message is a call to action for the letter carriers to be informed and assertive and for the union leadership to actively support their members. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode features John Poskin discussing Article 29 limitations on the replication of driving privileges. Poskin begins by outlining the relevant contract language from the JCAM, emphasizing that an employee's driving privileges can be revoked or suspended only when the on-duty record shows the employee is an unsafe driver. He explains that a "Safe Driver Award Committee" cannot revoke privileges; only the employee's on-duty record matters. Crucially, Poskin notes that management must make every reasonable effort to reassign a carrier with suspended driving privileges to non-driving duties within their craft or other crafts, stressing the responsibility falls on management. He explains situations where a temporary suspension of driving privileges is warranted and how an employee's record is assessed. Crucially, he clarifies that suspension or revocation of driving privileges is not automatic based solely on an accident but requires evidence of unsafe driving practices in the employee's on-duty record. Poskin then delves into a case study (C-18159), where Arbitrator Snow determined that management must make every reasonable effort to accommodate a carrier with a suspended license. This includes offering non-driving duties within the employee's craft or in other crafts, and if no such work is available, the carrier is entitled to leave with pay. Furthermore, Poskin details a case out of Chattanooga, Tennessee (C-32696), where a carrier with a medically related license suspension was not offered sufficient non-driving work. The arbitrator in this case ruled that management's failure to provide reasonable accommodation constituted a violation of Article 29, ordering reinstatement with back pay. Poskin also discusses a recent notice of removal case he worked on, highlighting issues in the case file and emphasizing the importance of clarity in charges, particularly when management fails to provide full information to union representatives. He states that in this case, the arbitrator sided with the union, ruling the removal unjustified due to management's failure to clearly demonstrate misconduct and failure to provide necessary information for the union to defend the carrier. Poskin stresses the importance of a clear articulation of the charges and the union's role in advocating for the carrier's rights. He underscores the responsibility of both the union and management to fulfill their contractual obligations in situations like these. The overall message from these cases is that the union has a clear responsibility to ensure carriers are fairly treated during any license suspension or potential removal, and management must prove their actions are justified in the carrier's record and follow proper grievance procedures. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode details the "anatomy of a removal," focusing on a specific arbitration case where Corey and JB successfully defended a carrier against a wrongful termination. Corey begins by discussing a commitment to send funds raised from podcast merchandise sales to aid letter carriers affected by the recent devastation in Hawaii. He challenges the union to match these donations. The core of the episode centers on the arbitration case, detailing the procedural steps, arguments, and evidence presented by both sides. The carrier, Mr. Tyler Jones, was removed for alleged misconduct, primarily claiming false FMLA leave. Corey and JB successfully defended Jones, highlighting critical procedural flaws in management's case: Insufficient Investigation: Corey emphasized the importance of a thorough and objective investigative interview. He pointed out that management's questioning was leading and accusatory, and crucial information (like text messages) was not presented during the interview but added later, casting doubt on its objectivity. This is a key point about maintaining the proper procedures. Lack of Concurrence: Corey noted management's failure to obtain the required concurrence on the disciplinary action before issuing the removal. He highlights that management presented the same document without proper concurrence at the formal step A meeting as was presented at the informal step, arguing that this was a sign of dishonesty and procedural violation. False Charges: The removal document contained false charges, claiming Jones had requested FMLA protection under false pretenses when, in reality, he had not knowingly obtained those protections. This point stressed the necessity of carefully verifying and supporting all claims in the documents. Inadequate Evidence: Corey emphasized management's failure to provide sufficient evidence to support the charges against Jones, particularly regarding the FMLA request and the dates of his absence. Misuse of Criminal Statutes: Corey's closing argument was critical of management's attempts to incorporate criminal statutes into the disciplinary case. He argued that these statutes were not applicable and inappropriately broadened the scope of the charges against the carrier. The arbitrator's decision ultimately sided with the union, reducing the removal to a suspension without back pay but with no loss of seniority. Corey provides a detailed overview of the arbitrator's reasoning and the specific points the arbitrator addressed, providing listeners with valuable insights into how to approach similar cases. He concludes by reiterating his commitment to defending letter carriers, advocating for ethical and just practices within the union, and encouraging a stronger union to better represent its members. He concludes with calls to action urging listeners to purchase merchandise to support the Hawaii relief efforts, to become more engaged in union affairs, and to demand accountability from their union leadership. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration features a discussion on letters of demand, focusing on Corey's perspective on how to effectively challenge management actions and the importance of strong grievance procedures. Corey begins by acknowledging a technical difficulty with the recording and previews future episodes on emergency placement and time record falsification. The episode's central theme is a critique of management practices and the union's response. Corey dissects the structure and language of letters of demand, emphasizing the need for precision in grievance filing. He highlights several instances where management has not properly explained the reasons behind a letter of demand, and argues that this constitutes a violation of the contract and a lack of due process. The episode delves into specific arbitration case precedents, demonstrating that arbitrators have ruled against management's use of letters of demand when insufficient justification was provided. This highlights Corey's emphasis on the need for specific, actionable grievances and precise language in the union's arguments to challenge management. Corey stresses that these cases are examples of how to effectively challenge management's actions within the framework of the contract. Corey discusses the importance of thorough preparation, citing examples of case files from previous episodes and highlighting the critical role of well-prepared union representatives in winning cases. Corey emphasizes a crucial point – the union's responsibility to protect its members from abuses of power by management. He criticizes the union leadership and business agents for not proactively educating carriers on their rights and how to effectively challenge management's tactics. He concludes with a call for a more assertive union stance, advocating for a new regime focused on proactive education and protection of letter carriers. Corey provides specific advice on how to handle such cases in the future and a preview of topics for upcoming episodes, including additional grievances and the need for a stronger union leadership and representation. Barrett C-33427 Bahakel C- 34086 Snow C-00511 Eaton C-20126 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode, while largely personal and emotional, focuses on the crucial need for union leadership to address the escalating issues concerning carrier working conditions, particularly in the context of heat-related illnesses and safety. Corey begins by acknowledging a recent criticism of his previous episode, which touched upon the topic of strikes and the union's no-strike clause. He clarifies his stance, stressing that while collective bargaining agreements prohibit strikes, he still believes that union leadership needs to take more active measures to address worsening conditions. He contends that the current leadership has been slow to address issues like inadequate heat protection for carriers, leading to potential health risks and fatalities. He contrasts this with the successful organizing tactics of other regions, particularly those who have begun organizing rallies to draw public attention to the issue. He urges a nationwide response, emphasizing that a collective, public display of concern is critical in pressuring management and influencing policy changes. Corey stresses the importance of actively defending carrier rights. He repeatedly criticizes the union's current leadership style, contrasting it with the aggressive, proactive approach he believes is necessary for gaining leverage and change. He urges listeners to contact their representatives, including Congress, about the specific problems with the falsification of training, the lack of resources, and safety concerns. He also directly addresses and rejects the perspective that the responsibility for carrier safety lies solely on the individual carriers themselves, arguing it is a contractual obligation of management. He underscores the idea that management and the union both have responsibilities for the working conditions and safety of carriers. Importantly, the episode highlights the fact that management appears to be retaliating against carriers for filing grievances related to these issues, further demonstrating Corey's contention that there is a need for more assertive action from the union. The episode concludes with a call to action, urging listeners to join in the effort to bring about change by demanding a response from union leadership on these issues. He advocates for a national rally and provides detailed instructions for checking HIPP training records, enabling carriers to identify instances of falsification. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode centers on Article 18, the no-strike clause of the postal contract. Corey strongly cautions against any social media or informal discussions about work stoppages or strikes. He emphasizes that such actions are a violation of the contract and can lead to termination. He supports this by citing four arbitration decisions from the same post office, where carriers were terminated for engaging in a concerted work stoppage. Corey details the legal ramifications of a no-strike clause, stressing that engaging in such discussions, even on social media, is evidence that can be used against employees. He argues that it's not necessary to engage in a strike since the grievance procedure already exists, and that collective bargaining, not unilateral actions, should be the path for addressing concerns. Furthermore, the episode returns to the recurring theme of management's behavior and actions. Corey discusses the importance of thorough investigation from the union's perspective in responding to grievances, noting the critical role of thorough information gathering, and challenging management's attempts to dismiss these concerns or argue that such action isn't efficient. He stresses that demanding documentation and evidence, particularly related to past practices, is crucial in defending against management's arguments and grievances. A significant portion of the episode focuses on a current case where a carrier was removed for falsifying medical documentation. Corey's approach in this situation involves meticulous information gathering, particularly related to the carrier's heat-related leave request and any potential management falsification of training records. He stresses the need for procedural fairness and emphasizes that management's alleged misconduct in one case warrants investigation into possible similar violations in other cases. He suggests that any union's failure to aggressively confront falsification could set a dangerous precedent for future cases. Corey repeats his commitment to supporting carriers, regardless of potential criticism. He emphasizes the importance of education, detailed grievance procedures, thoroughness in preparation, and the importance of demanding full transparency and accountability from both management and the union. He repeats a call to arms encouraging union members to become more involved and assertive, particularly regarding issues concerning carrier safety and fair treatment, while strongly condemning the use of social media to organize or plan for actions outside the contract. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode discusses several hot topics, including Corey's recent experience with online criticism and the passionate defense he received from listeners. Corey emphasizes that he's committed to educating and advocating for letter carriers, regardless of listener reaction. He notes that some listeners criticized the podcast's tone, shifting from informative to overly emotional, although he argues the podcast is ultimately about protecting letter carriers. The episode pivots to the central issue of the falsification of heat-related training (HIPP) records, which Corey considers a serious and widespread violation of the contract. He applauds the efforts of two business agents, Mike Caref and Eddie Davidson, who have been actively fighting these issues. He underscores the critical role of education and union advocacy in combating these issues. Corey argues the falsification directly relates to management's pressure to reduce office time, noting that the training, a twenty-minute video, is intentionally not completed, so carriers are not given the time or are being dishonest to make it look like they've done their training, instead of giving them adequate breaks, which are protected under the contract. Corey delves into two arbitration case studies from previous episodes, focusing on past practice violations. In these cases, management attempted to unilaterally change established practices regarding union hall use. The cases demonstrate the importance of establishing a valid past practice to protect the union's right to utilize the union hall for work on the clock. A core point is that management argues that such practices are inefficient or unsafe, but fails to provide evidence to back up these claims and fails to engage in good-faith negotiations. Corey repeatedly emphasizes the importance of demanding evidence and documentation from management to support their claims, highlighting the potential for these arguments to be used in any past practice case. Corey provides clear instructions to determine if a carrier's HIPP training was falsified. This includes navigating the carrier's liteblue online portal to view training records and details. He stresses the importance of documenting any issues and using this information in grievance filings. He concludes with a call for unity and action among carriers and union members to address the issues presented, as well as a declaration of his continued commitment to fighting for their rights and safety. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration, despite technical difficulties, focuses on the critical issue of intentional falsification of heat-related training records by the Postal Service. The host, Corey, expresses frustration at the pervasive nature of this issue, arguing it's the most significant grievance facing carriers in their careers. He emphasizes the importance of holding the Postal Service accountable for this intentional misconduct, likening it to a battle that demands resolute action from the union. Corey addresses a criticism leveled against him by a person within the union's structure and commits to discussing it further. He lauds the efforts of two business agents, Mike Carriff and Eddie Davidson, for their proactive and aggressive approach to protecting letter carriers in these cases, highlighting their understanding of the importance of education and advocacy to ensure carrier safety. He argues that a well-educated workforce is a powerful workforce, essential to challenging management's attempts to circumvent the contract. Corey criticizes the union's apparent lack of decisive action in many areas, highlighting how certain business agents and B-teams have seemingly chosen to avoid confrontation. He critiques the passivity displayed by some, urging them to become more proactive advocates. He advocates for transparency and accountability within the union structure, suggesting that every aspect of union activity be visible and explainable. The episode dives into a specific B-Team decision, outlining the issues involved in a heat-related training case. The decision had been critiqued by some as not taking an assertive stance against the Postal Service's clear falsification, although both parties had already identified the violations. This is a key point: Corey's criticism was not that the decision wasn't strong enough but that the union failed to appropriately pressure management to adhere to the contract. Corey stresses the importance of holding management accountable, especially when they are intentionally violating the contract. He insists on thorough documentation of carriers' lack of training to support claims to arbitrators, and advocates for challenging management's assertions that this was not a recurring problem. He highlights management's attempts to present "smoke and mirrors" arguments, emphasizing the importance of focusing on the falsification of records rather than irrelevant details like safety talks or postings. He also discusses the importance of supervisors ensuring training compliance, pointing to the fact that some employees are still being put at risk without proper training due to intentional violations of the contractual obligation of heat-training. This issue directly relates to the health and safety of the carriers. Corey concludes the episode by emphasizing the need for the union to be more assertive in defending the rights of letter carriers, especially in cases involving heat-related training violations. He emphasizes the need for stronger union leadership to actively support carriers and encourages transparency in union operations. He asserts that the union's failure to act decisively is a serious flaw that threatens the safety and welfare of the workforce. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode is a passionate and lengthy discussion centered on the escalating issue of heat-related safety concerns for postal workers, and the union's response (or lack thereof) to management's apparent disregard for those concerns. Corey expresses deep frustration with the perceived inaction and complacency of some union leaders. He argues that the current leadership is failing to adequately protect letter carriers, highlighting the significance of the falsification of heat training records and the resulting lack of protections for carriers. Corey focuses on the importance of proactive union action, emphasizing that current leadership's lack of public engagement and direct challenge to management's policies is harmful. He cites the need for a "library of arbitration decisions" to provide a strong foundation for future grievances, specifically noting that management often lies and fails to provide sufficient documentation when facing scrutiny. This point highlights his strong belief that the union's inaction is directly endangering workers. He details a recent B-team decision that, rather than confronting the potential falsification of heat training, essentially instructed management to "just do the training." Corey criticizes this approach, arguing it gives management a loophole and essentially allows them to continue their detrimental practices. Corey also argues that management's recent actions—specifically, their responses to OSHA complaints and their refusal to provide requested information about heat training—are further evidence of a pattern of deceptive practices. He points out how management's rhetoric of concern for employee safety contrasts sharply with their concrete actions that put carriers at risk. He suggests that the union's inaction is likely a deliberate choice by union leadership to avoid confrontation, which he strongly criticizes. He calls for a nationwide rally to address the working conditions and advocate for carriers, reiterating that a collective voice is critical for bringing about meaningful change. He emphasizes the importance of being prepared for management's arguments (e.g., claims of inefficiency or concerns about safety). The discussion concludes with a call for increased union engagement, stronger leadership, and the immediate need for a public effort to influence policymakers and advocate for carriers' safety and working conditions. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a passionate critique of the NALC's leadership and management's handling of heat-related safety issues, specifically focusing on the death of a letter carrier, Eugene Gates. Corey starts by acknowledging listener feedback and previews upcoming episodes on emergency placement. The core of the episode is an intense critique of the union's leadership, particularly the president, for their perceived inaction and lack of advocacy on behalf of city letter carriers. Corey argues that the current leadership is not adequately representing the concerns of carriers regarding the dangerous working conditions, especially the heat-related risks. He accuses the president of being out of touch with the realities on the workroom floor and of failing to advocate for better working conditions, instead focusing on other issues. This criticism is specifically tied to the death of Mr. Gates, Corey asserting that management's policies and the union's failure to act contributed to his death. The episode features Corey reading a newspaper article detailing the circumstances of Mr. Gates' death and the employer's subsequent, perceived lack of response. This article and the subsequent discussion are a central part of Corey's critique, illustrating what he sees as the union's failure to use these incidents to leverage change and educate their members. Corey calls for a more proactive and aggressive union stance on these types of safety concerns and critiques the lack of leadership. The episode concludes with a call for action, urging listeners to take their concerns regarding working conditions to their local leadership. He advocates for a militant stance on grievances and emphasizes the need for unity and education within the membership to counter management's tactics. The episode's underlying message is a call for a shift in the union's strategy to effectively represent the safety and well-being of letter carriers and to fight back against management's abuses of power. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode delves into the topic of rollaway runaway accidents and how to combat potential disciplinary actions against postal workers. Corey begins by reiterating his commitment to supporting letter carriers, stating that he will not back down from any criticism or perceived shortcomings in his advocacy. He emphasizes that his primary focus is on the safety and well-being of postal workers. The episode then centers on rollaway runaway accidents, presenting a detailed account of a 2011 case involving a carrier at his former station. This extensive case file, comprising 262 pages, is slated for public access on the podcast website, providing a detailed template for handling similar incidents. Corey stresses the importance of thoroughly documenting every aspect of the accident, including witness statements, information requests, and any communication between the union and management. A key argument presented is that vehicle maintenance facilities (VMF) often deflect blame from themselves onto carriers. Corey emphasizes the importance of challenging these claims and demanding documentation demonstrating that the vehicles are indeed in safe working order. The episode also revisits the issue of stationary events and how scanner data, used for route evaluations, can be manipulated by management to unfairly discipline carriers. Corey argues that management's use of these data points for disciplinary actions outside of the context of route adjustment (as outlined in memos) is a violation of existing policies. He stresses that carriers should not be penalized for legitimate actions on the street based on data collected solely through a scanner. Corey asserts that the union must forcefully challenge such practices and demand a clear articulation of the justification for any such actions. Several arbitration decisions are discussed, particularly those regarding rollaway runaway accidents and disciplinary actions. The episode emphasizes the importance of understanding the implications of false park defects in these types of accidents and suggests the need for detailed and thorough investigation by union representatives at the scene. Corey concludes by calling for a proactive and assertive approach to union leadership, emphasizing the importance of collective action to combat management tactics that threaten carrier safety and working conditions. He advocates for a wider-reaching campaign to raise public awareness about these issues and urges listeners to file similar grievances and actively challenge these tactics. Finally, he commits to providing information on donating to the family of a recently deceased carrier, Mr. Gates, demonstrating a continued commitment to supporting the carrier community. Roberts C-30421 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode is a powerful and emotionally charged response to the death of letter carrier Eugene Gates Jr. in Dallas, Texas. Corey expresses deep anger and frustration with the Postal Service's perceived lack of concern for employee safety, particularly in the context of heat-related illnesses, and the union's seemingly inadequate response. The episode's main theme is Corey's sharp criticism of NALC leadership, particularly the union president. Corey argues that the president has failed to effectively address the heat-related safety concerns, and the death of Mr. Gates, leading to a lack of proactive advocacy and a failure to educate members about their rights. He accuses the leadership of failing to rally public support for the carriers' safety and well-being. He stresses that the union's silence, coupled with management's apparent disregard for carrier safety, has left workers vulnerable. Corey uses the death of Mr. Gates to illustrate the lack of a strong union response. He critiques the statements made by the USPS and the president on the incident, contrasting them with a more forceful stance on protecting letter carriers' safety, arguing that management is prioritizing metrics over worker safety, and highlighting what he sees as a deflection of responsibility onto the carrier. Corey then analyzes specific arbitration precedents, outlining the steps in how to challenge management's practices. He reiterates his approach to grievance filing, urging members to focus on the contractual obligations of management and the union's responsibilities. Corey argues that by failing to take a proactive stance against the abuse of carriers, the union has failed to protect their members and has effectively given management the upper hand. Corey calls for more militant action and a change in the union's culture to better represent the city letter carriers, emphasizing the importance of education. The episode closes with a call to action, urging greater member involvement in advocating for safer working conditions and a stronger union, highlighting the need for a change in leadership to effectively represent carriers and challenge management's indifference to carrier safety. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a highly critical and passionate discussion about Corey's frustrations with the NALC's leadership and management's tactics, particularly regarding heat safety issues, the handling of grievances, and the perceived lack of member support. Corey begins by thanking a guest and previews future episodes on emergency placements and time record falsification. The episode centers on a specific grievance involving a one-hour office time policy. Corey criticizes the union's apparent inaction and lack of preparation in addressing the new policy despite months of discussion and speculation about its implementation. He directly challenges the union's leadership, arguing that their hesitation and lack of proactive measures in preparing their members for such potential issues put their members at a severe disadvantage in negotiations and potential arbitration. He further criticizes this by highlighting that the NALC is now behaving like 15 different unions, rather than as a cohesive national entity. Corey analyzes several arbitration decisions, emphasizing that management's arguments are often based on dubious metrics and that their actions are not always in keeping with the contract's protections for workers. He demonstrates how to effectively dispute charges related to stationary events, emphasizing that carriers should primarily respond with "I was working," and avoid engaging in further discussion about their activities. He criticizes management's practice of using scanner data as evidence, pointing out that the use of these data points is often prohibited, based on their own memos. Crucially, Walton dissects the importance of understanding and using contract provisions like Article 16, which details the "Just Cause" principle, to challenge management's actions. He advocates for meticulously scrutinizing any discipline notices to ensure they have a strong factual basis and are consistent with the contract. Walton also emphasizes the importance of understanding and challenging management's attempts to use "covert techniques" (e.g., monitoring on scanners) to support disciplinary actions. He cites a specific arbitration ruling that addressed such tactics and argues that any disciplinary actions based on these techniques are often invalid. Corey critiques the union's leadership for not proactively educating members, highlighting that carriers are being disciplined or pressured into unsafe practices, and that the union isn't providing adequate support or guidance. He emphasizes the need for a stronger and more unified stance against management, including an aggressive approach to challenging management's actions and demanding compliance with the contract. The episode ends with a passionate call for change within the union, advocating for more assertive and educated union leadership. He emphasizes the need for collective action and urges listeners to prepare for upcoming challenges through education on relevant contractual provisions, arbitration precedents, and the establishment of a more assertive stance against management. M-01458 wolitz C-32778 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode is hosted by Cole Billups, a shop steward in Asheboro, North Carolina, delves into the anatomy of a grievance file. The episode is aimed at new shop stewards and those considering the role. The episode begins with a breakdown of the different steps in the grievance process: Informal Step A, Formal Step A, Step B, and Arbitration. It emphasizes the time limits for each step and highlights the importance of documenting everything. Cole then dives into the process of investigating a grievance, emphasizing the importance of being methodical and using available resources like employee everything reports and online resources. He advises new stewards to be detail-oriented and to use interviews with carriers, management, and even customers to gather information. He discusses the importance of requesting information and time from management, always ensuring to obtain copies of signed requests and confirmations of time provided. Next, Cole delves into the construction of a grievance file, emphasizing the need for clarity and conciseness. He recommends using a template for issue statements, facts, contentions, and remedies. The episode goes into detail about the importance of remedies, emphasizing the need to make them enforceable for the future. Cole advises shop stewards to aim for language that includes cease and desist clauses and escalated monetary awards for future violations. He concludes by offering a step-by-step guide on organizing a grievance file, highlighting the importance of including all relevant documents and contract language. The episode ends with a brief discussion about the informal Step A meeting and encourages new stewards to be effective in representing their members. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration focuses on challenging management's requests for medical documentation when an employee calls in sick for three days or less, emphasizing the importance of a strong and well-prepared union defense against potential abuses of power. Corey begins by acknowledging listener feedback and upcoming episode previews. The core theme of the episode is a deep critique of management's potential for abusing power and the need for union members to be prepared to challenge such actions. Corey highlights a recent trend where management is increasingly demanding medical documentation for short-term sick leave, arguing this practice may violate the contract, and is particularly problematic because it lacks clear legal justification or precedence within the contract. The episode presents several specific arbitration cases involving similar issues and dissects the relevant contract provisions to demonstrate Corey's position that management has the burden to prove a valid reason for requiring such documentation. He emphasizes the importance of understanding the procedural requirements for grievances and how management's actions potentially contradict established principles and protections afforded to letter carriers. Corey also shares a personal story about a near-drowning experience, using it to illustrate the theme of standing up for oneself and one's rights, arguing that a strong advocacy stance is crucial for the union and its members. He concludes by reiterating the need for union members to be educated and equipped to challenge management's policies, and by outlining a plan to help members prepare for similar future issues. The overall message is a call for a more proactive and assertive approach to defending the rights of letter carriers against potential management abuses. Brandon C-19250 McConnell C-04974 Foster C-04436 Caraway C-04195 Rosen C-30959 Marx C-04209 Zumas C-04897 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a highly critical discussion of the NALC's leadership and management tactics, focusing on Corey's frustration with the union's handling of recent grievances, particularly those related to heat safety. Corey begins by thanking a guest and previews future episodes focused on specific grievances and tactics for challenging management. The central theme is a powerful critique of the union's leadership. Corey argues that the union leadership has failed to adequately represent the interests of letter carriers, particularly in protecting them from potentially dangerous working conditions, such as the heat, and has not aggressively challenged management's actions. He emphasizes the importance of a proactive, militant approach to grievances. He also criticizes the union's leadership for not educating members about their rights and responsibilities regarding various grievances (like those concerning time-record manipulation or other forms of work). Corey dissects several recent arbitration cases and grievance procedures, arguing that the union has allowed management to dictate terms in these situations and has not pursued stronger, more forceful remedies. He accuses the union of abandoning its members and being too focused on maintaining their positions instead of representing the city letter carriers. A key point is Corey's analysis of how management's arguments frequently center on procedural issues (such as timeliness of grievances), thereby enabling management to avoid accountability and effectively silencing carrier concerns. Corey emphasizes the importance of challenging these procedural arguments and holding management accountable for their actions, regardless of whether a member has made a mistake, emphasizing that the union needs to be aggressive in defense of its members and their rights. The episode concludes with a call to action, urging listeners to prepare for future challenges by studying arbitration precedents and the contract, and to vote for a union leadership that is actively committed to defending the rights and safety of city letter carriers. He underscores the importance of member unity and education in opposing management's tactics and demands a more assertive role in representing the needs of carriers. Rentfro C-01030 Dash Jr. C-00308 Roberts C-31908 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode is a lengthy discussion, primarily focused on Corey's frustration with the union's response to various issues, particularly the falsification of heat training records. The core of the episode centers around the importance of a strategic approach to grievances, contrasting a "checkers" approach (reactive and fragmented) with a "chess" approach (proactive and unified). He contends that some union leaders are not properly educating or preparing their members for these issues, leading to management's ability to continue harmful practices, citing specific instances where management failed to adequately address union concerns. Corey delves into several arbitration cases to highlight patterns of management misconduct, particularly in the falsification of documents like heat training and time records. He argues that management often uses misleading metrics to create a perception of good performance while, in reality, placing carriers at risk. He emphasizes that falsification is a serious issue, often leading to removal in prior arbitration cases, and that the current approach of the union (often advising members to "just do the training") is inadequate. Corey advocates for a more unified and strategic approach to these grievances, urging shop stewards and other union representatives to be more aggressive in challenging management actions and demanding complete transparency. He critiques the lack of collective action and unified strategy by the union, stressing that a fragmented approach (playing checkers) will only result in continued disadvantage. He emphasizes that the union must play chess to defeat management's checkers tactics. He offers specific strategies, like demanding documentation and requesting interviews to thoroughly investigate allegations of wrongdoing. Finally, the episode highlights a recent memorandum from management concerning certified mail handling within delivery point sequence (DPS) mail. Corey emphasizes this as a crucial point for future grievances, providing the contractual language and the rationale for filing grievances concerning the placement of certified mail into the DPS stream. The episode ends with a passionate call for more proactive leadership within the union to support carriers and with a call to action for listeners to be ready to fight for their rights, encouraging the use of arbitration decisions to build a strong defense. arb. Goldstein C-17898 arb Talmadge C-28539 a-b arb August C-34357 arb August C-32489 certified mail in dps starts at 1:45 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration is a highly critical and passionate discussion about Corey's frustration with the NALC leadership, particularly its perceived lack of advocacy for letter carriers. Corey starts by acknowledging the episode's milestone (100th episode) and thanking listeners, then previews upcoming episodes. The core theme is a critique of the NALC leadership for perceived inaction and a failure to effectively address issues impacting letter carriers. Corey discusses the need for union leaders to proactively address issues like heat-related safety concerns, arbitrary changes in working conditions, and the falsification of training records. He contrasts this with management's apparent success in disseminating information and strategizing, arguing that the union is falling behind. The episode features Corey reading and analyzing several B-team decisions and arbitration awards that, in his opinion, illustrate management's successful manipulation of the grievance process. Corey emphasizes the importance of meticulously understanding contract provisions and past precedents. He directly criticizes some business agents for not actively defending carriers, and the episode culminates in an impassioned call to action, emphasizing the importance of a more militant and unified union stance to confront management's alleged abuses. He stresses the need for shop stewards to take a proactive approach by gathering information, creating thorough case files, and challenging management's actions, urging listeners to adopt similar strategies. The episode ends with a plea for a more forceful and educated union membership. Corey highlights the importance of education and unity in the face of perceived management tactics. He previews future episodes dedicated to specific grievances (including rollaway accidents) and encourages active listener participation, particularly regarding incidents they're experiencing, reiterating a commitment to defending letter carriers. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode, featuring Corey and Jason “J.B.” Leath discussing various issues concerning letter carriers' rights and grievances. Leath addresses concerns about management's use of PS Form 3999 (a one-day mail count) to circumvent the TIEREAP route adjustment process. He argues that this is an attempt to establish new performance standards outside of agreed-upon procedures. He details how carriers should respond to management's use of 3999s, by immediately filing grievances for issues such as improper requests, refusal of copies, and discrepancies with estimated times. He also discusses how the use of one-day counts or 3999 evaluations could lead to violations of other articles (8, 16, and 41) and potential disciplinary actions. JB stresses the importance of documentation, pattern recognition, and unified action to resist these practices. A major point is the inappropriate use of a single day's performance to establish a carrier's performance standard and the carriers' rights to grieve such attempts. He also emphasizes that carriers are not obligated to sign non-postal forms, such as "welcome back" or "return to work" letters, unless those forms are compliant with existing agreements. JB cites various M-documents and handbook provisions to support his claims. The episode highlights the need for carriers to be proactive in filing grievances, educating themselves about their rights, and supporting each other. JB also promotes regional podcasts to address specific issues and help educate carriers. 17 minutes - 3999 and demonstrated performance 58 minutes - grieving management requiring carriers to sign return-to-work letters http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on grievances related to alleged management misconduct and the lack of support from the union. Corey begins by acknowledging JB Leath's absence due to baseball commitments and promises to cover the one-day count grievance in a future episode. He then dives into multiple listener emails and messages, detailing issues like management's alleged falsification of heat training records and attempts to enforce arbitrary time limits (e.g., one hour office time, 22 minutes loading time). Corey highlights a concerning pattern of management imposing new standards and policies without clear contractual basis, and without adequate union response. He critiques the union's perceived inaction and lack of proactive measures in addressing these issues. He also discusses a letter of warning for a carrier who experienced a minor accident, arguing that the wording and accusations are overly harsh and lack justification. Corey emphasizes the importance of carriers documenting instances of perceived harassment or intimidation and the critical need for proactive grievance filing. He then outlines the issues with mandatory scanners, threats made regarding completion of routes, and the noncompliance of existing grievance agreements by management. He specifically details the steps involved in falsifying HERO training records and argues for a class-action grievance against the management. As a remedy, Corey advocates for $50 per calendar day for every affected carrier from April 1, 2023, until the actual training is successfully completed. The podcast concludes with Corey reiterating his commitment to representing letter carriers, calling out perceived inadequacies in the union's response, and challenging any union officials to a public debate on the discussed issues. EL 801 1-1 thru 1-7 EL 802 4-1 (f) EL 814 intro ELM 811.21-811.25 ELM 812.3-812.51 ELM 817.9 ELM 821.141 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey recounts a personal experience where he faced intimidation from postal inspectors and the subsequent decision to join the union. He now passionately advocates for letter carriers, citing numerous complaints about inadequate union support and management's attempts to reduce work time/load times through falsified training records. Corey emphasizes that the union isn't always representing carriers effectively, leading to his confrontational tone and focus on filing grievances. He plans a future episode with JB focusing on grievances regarding improperly recorded training. He mentions a listener's concern about the negativity of the podcast and acknowledges that a portion of his audience is displeased with the shift in tone. He states that his focus remains on educating carriers and supporting them, even if it means confrontation. He highlights specific examples of management actions and encourages listeners to file grievances regarding these issues. Corey highlights the value of his podcast by citing over 217,950 downloads and the impact his episodes have had on listeners with successful grievance outcomes. Finally, Corey plans to continue his role as a voice for voiceless letter carriers, even if it means alienating some listeners. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on the perceived weakness of the NALC in addressing carrier concerns, likening the union to a possum, not a lion. Corey critiques the union's response to various issues, including management's increased monitoring (through memos and videos showing how to meet office time/load time standards), inadequate training documentation (including falsified records for heat illness prevention training), and the use of locally-generated forms that are inconsistent with the contract. Corey emphasizes the need for the NALC to take a more assertive stance in defending letter carriers. He criticizes the lack of action from union leadership and business agents to address these concerns and points out the union's failure to issue cease and desist orders. He highlights examples of management using new tactics, documented via scanner messages, to monitor carriers' time. He challenges the validity of new management-imposed load and office time standards in light of documented past practices. Importantly, Corey highlights several arbitration case summaries, specifically decisions from arbitrators Arlen Sensi, David Stanton, and Louise Wollatz, addressing violations of the contract. These summaries detail instances where locally generated forms were not properly promulgated, or forms violated national standards, and resulted in union wins. He urges listeners to examine these cases for their insights. He also mentions a national video on how to meet new office time/load times that carries potential for discipline. Further, Corey discusses issues around certified mail and DPS procedures, highlighting contradictions between postmaster instructions and the contract (M-41 335.16). He provides a solution: use the contract to challenge these practices through grievances. He concludes by reiterating the need for the NALC to be more proactive and aggressive in defending the rights of letter carriers. Finally, Corey emphasizes the importance of using arbitration case studies to inform grievances, and notes the use of discord and other online forums as avenues for support and information sharing among carriers. He further emphasizes the importance of the cease and desist orders in these grievances and urges listener engagement in such efforts. Hutt C-35552 Stanton C-34924 Wolitz C-34211 Stanton C-34874 Cenci C-35989 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

The episode leverages the adage, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend," to illustrate their support for rural carriers who are also negatively impacted by management decisions, aligning both groups against a common adversary. This "enemy," management, is accused of unfair labor practices like manipulating route inspection data, imposing unreasonable time constraints, and disregarding medical restrictions. Corey criticizes the larger union for not adequately protecting workers and encourages carriers to actively resist these injustices by grieving every infraction and refusing to be conditioned into accepting unfair treatment. Ultimately, the episode reveals a struggle for power between labor and management within the postal service, with Corey urging individual workers to become informed and take action to protect their rights. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode, Corey, introduces John Poskin who provides an in-depth analysis of filing grievances, particularly focusing on PS form 8190 and its correct usage. John emphasizes the importance of accurately documenting details like seniority dates and grievance numbers, using real arbitration cases to illustrate their significance in achieving favorable outcomes for employees. A substantial portion of the episode centers around the concept of "light duty" assignments, delving into the specific contractual language and obligations of both the employee and the postal service. John discusses various clauses within Article 13 of the JCAM (Joint Contract Administration Manual) that pertain to light duty requests, eligibility criteria, and the responsibilities of installation heads in granting or denying them. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode Corey begins by expressing gratitude to his team, emphasizing the importance of their online platforms like the website, Facebook page, Discord, and Reddit for disseminating information and fostering a sense of community. He then addresses a listener's concerns about their local union leadership, specifically criticizing a business agent's "cowardly" explanation that blames letter carriers' behavior for weak contract negotiations. Corey then reads and comments on a letter from an "angry branch president" who is frustrated by weak pre-arbitration settlements that fail to hold management accountable for violating contract terms. Corey shares the president's anger and emphasizes the need for strong union representation that fights for the rights of letter carriers. He concludes by briefly addressing other topics like mail count procedures, disciplinary actions, and uniform allowances, reiterating the importance of utilizing the grievance process to challenge management and advocate for fair treatment. 1838c 22 minutes CCA uniform allowance 1:00 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey apologizes for a technical issue and expresses his dedication to educating and supporting union members. He emphasizes the importance of filing grievances as a powerful tool for union members to assert their rights and hold management accountable. He delves into Article 17 of the national agreement, providing a detailed explanation of steward rights regarding grievance investigation time and urging stewards to challenge management's unreasonable denial of this time. Through various anecdotes and case studies, he highlights the significance of meticulous documentation, thorough investigation, and knowledge of contractual provisions to effectively challenge disciplinary actions and protect workers' rights. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey criticizes the lack of support and representation from union leadership, arguing that the root cause of this failure is a "lack of love." He emphasizes that love, in this context, means fiercely protecting and advocating for the rights of union members. He advocates for a ground-roots uprising, urging listeners to vote out ineffective union leaders and stand up for their rights. He concludes with an emotional appeal, expressing his love for the members and his frustration with the current state of the union! http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

The episode centers around educating letter carriers about their rights, particularly regarding grievances against management. JB emphasizes the importance of meticulous documentation, using examples like clock rings and tax reports to support grievance claims. He also encourages letter carriers to be aware of their rights as outlined in the M-41 handbook, especially regarding PM office duties and the processing of undeliverable mail. Ultimately, JB advocates for a unified workforce, urging letter carriers to support each other and utilize the grievance process to ensure fair treatment and adherence to contractual obligations. 20:00 Identifying falsified clock rings 43:00 defeating management's 5-minute pm office duties 1:00:00 defining the Part-Time Flexible (ptf) http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey details an account of a significant arbitration case in Memphis. He emphasizes the case's importance due to the "toxic working environment" in the Memphis installation, a situation the union repeatedly attempted to address. A key aspect of their success was the meticulous preparation and presentation of their case, particularly by Jason Atchley, whose expertise is applauded. The arbitrator's decision, a testament to the union's efforts, mandates the Memphis installation to cease its hostile work environment, provides EAP services for all employees, and establishes a conflict resolution committee. Corey celebrates this victory for the Memphis postal workers while acknowledging the unfortunate tragedy that precipitated it. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC) Business Agent, Mike Caref joins the show. Caref emphasizes the upcoming collective bargaining negotiations with the United States Postal Service, arguing that letter carriers deserve a contract that addresses their fundamental needs. He outlines significant issues including low starting pay, mandatory overtime, and disregard for contractual obligations by USPS management. Caref believes that the current contract fails to adequately address these issues and urges NALC members to demand a contract that improves their quality of life, threatening to vote against any agreement that falls short. He expresses optimism about President Renfroe's leadership while calling on members to hold their union representatives accountable for securing a fair and equitable contract. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey provides a passionate analysis of Article 8 of the National Agreement, detailing its complexities and emphasizing the importance of "muscle memory," or a deep familiarity with the contract, for effective advocacy. He criticizes union leadership for inadequate communication and support, particularly regarding issues like mandatory overtime and stationary events, arguing that this lack of guidance forces carriers to seek information from unreliable sources. He encourages listeners to utilize all available resources, including past grievance settlements and compliance letters, to challenge management violations and protect their rights. 26:00 Article 8 fromatoarbitration.com

Corey dedicates a significant portion of the episode to informing listeners about their rights as postal workers, particularly focusing on strategies for navigating workplace disputes and challenging unfair management practices. Corey emphasizes the importance of understanding contractual obligations, using specific examples like Article 41 (concerning temporary supervisor positions) and the procedures outlined in Publication 552 (related to workplace harassment). The episode underscores his commitment to advocating for workers' rights and providing them with the tools to protect themselves against potential exploitation. 12:00 stationary events 31:30 management forcing carriers to buy personal clothing C-11163 Talmadge C-08170 Rentfro C-13221 Erbs 49:00 204b's circumventing Article 41 120days/4-months C-05230 Jacobowski C-13823 Scearce 1:13:00 Postal Service Policy on Workplace Harassment, Publication 552/IMIP process dealing with unruly Management C-30829 Bowers http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode centers on a conflict between Corey and the leadership of the National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC). Corey defends his decision to create a podcast focused on educating letter carriers about their rights, particularly regarding workplace issues and contract interpretation. He argues that this educational mission is essential, as many carriers are being taken advantage of due to a lack of knowledge about their rights. This commitment to education persists despite the NALC actively attempting to silence him, including blackballing him from official union activities and expelling him from the National Convention. Corey sees this response, driven by a desire to suppress information and maintain control, as detrimental to the rank-and-file members. He emphasizes the importance of information as power and encourages carriers to seek knowledge from any available source. Cites Foster c-00191 Snow c-22546 Levak c-08199 Cenci c-26893 Bahakel c-29815 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey expresses his frustration with the lack of strong leadership within his postal worker's union. He argues that the union lacks a powerful figure like Vince Sombrotto, a former leader whom Corey believes would not tolerate the current status quo of noncompliance from management regarding worker rights and contractual agreements. Corey highlights the financial burden incurred by management due to these violations, using examples of arbitration awards that cost the postal service hundreds of thousands of dollars. He suggests that greater public awareness of these issues, perhaps driven by a charismatic leader like Sombrotto, could force the postal service to address the concerns of the overworked and underpaid carriers. Ultimately, Corey advocates for continued education and worker empowerment within the union, hoping for a future leader who embodies Sombrotto's fighting spirit. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey reflects on the rewarding experience of empowering letter carriers to advocate for themselves and celebrate victories. He contrasts this with the deeply upsetting reality of union leadership failing to adequately support these advocates, particularly by not enforcing “cease and desist” orders against management overwork. He recounts his personal experience burning out and quitting as a union representative after facing similar struggles with inadequate support. He encourages listeners not to quit, referencing his own story as a cautionary tale while emphasizing the need for solidarity and collective action. He concludes with a rallying cry, calling on his fellow union members to join him in fighting for their rights. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on Article 8 of a labor union contract. Article 8, which defines work hours, overtime, and pay guarantees, is very important but also very confusing for both employees and managers. Corey emphasizes the importance of understanding the literal meaning of the contract language: "Article 8 says what it says. It does not say what it does not say." To illustrate how the rules should be applied, Corey details specific scenarios about overtime assignments, schedule changes, and the rights of different employee classifications, like CCAs and PTFs. Corey ends by urging all shop stewards, the intended audience of the podcast, to study Article 8, seek training, and strive to be a “champion for the people.” http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

The episode features a collection of anecdotes and advice for postal workers navigating labor disputes with management. Corey emphasizes the importance of union solidarity and aggressive representation, illustrating his points with stories of management lying about employee infractions and manipulating disciplinary procedures. He encourages listeners to be proactive in challenging management claims, offering strategies for shop stewards to defend their coworkers during investigative interviews. Ultimately, Corey aims to empower postal workers with knowledge of their contractual rights and inspire them to hold both management and union representatives accountable for ensuring fair treatment. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

JB explains in great detail how to interpret local overtime records and file a grievance if overtime has not been distributed equitably among employees. He emphasizes the importance of thorough documentation, careful analysis of clock rings, and understanding the contractual obligations of both management and employees. Interspersed with this technical information are heartfelt expressions of gratitude for the labor movement, reflections on a friend's recent death, and pronouncements about the dignity of hard work. Ultimately, the episode highlights the importance of advocating for oneself and one's co-workers, understanding one's rights, and continuing to learn. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

The episode features a guest speaker, John Poskin, a union steward with extensive experience in handling transfer grievances. Poskin provides a detailed explanation of Article 12 of the National Agreement, which outlines the process for employee transfer requests within the Postal Service. He emphasizes the importance of "full consideration" of an employee's work history, attendance and safety records when considering a transfer request. Poskin also discusses two specific grievance cases he handled, highlighting the importance of thorough investigation, documentation and communication with management to ensure fair treatment for employees seeking transfers. The episode concludes with Corey expressing his gratitude to Poskin for sharing his expertise and announcing upcoming episodes on other relevant topics. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

A letter carrier, Richie Ray, successfully grieved a new policy that imposed a blanket 60-minute office time for all carriers, regardless of mail volume. The grievance argued that this policy violated multiple articles of the National Agreement and disregarded established postal handbooks and manuals. Here's a breakdown of the key points: The grievance cited specific sections of handbooks M-41 and M-39 to demonstrate the violation of existing office time standards. It also argued that the policy created a hostile work environment due to the undue stress placed on carriers. Management's response claimed the grievance was frivolous and cited Article 3, which grants management the right to manage, and ELM 665.15, which mandates employees to obey supervisor instructions. They argued the policy aimed to enhance productivity and reduce overtime. The Dispute Resolution Team (DRT) ruled in favor of the union, finding the grievance to have merit. The DRT found that management's imposed policy of a specific office time regardless of mail volume directly contradicted established postal handbooks and manuals. The DRT ordered management to retract the policy, allow carriers to perform their duties according to established procedures, and conduct a service talk to inform carriers of the policy's retraction. Corey celebrated this victory as a precedent for challenging similar policies nationwide. He emphasized the importance of citing specific contractual provisions and using tools like work hour workload reports to support grievances. Additionally, he addressed the issue of timeliness, using a case from National Arbitrator Richard Mittenthal as an example. This case established that continuous violations of the contract can be grieved at any point, regardless of when the violation began. This sets a precedent for challenging ongoing violations even if they weren't initially grieved. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

The episode highlights various grievances and concerns raised by members of a union regarding the lack of representation and support from their leadership. Members express frustration over the unavailability and inaction of their union president and shop steward, leading to a sense of abandonment and vulnerability in dealing with management. Grievances include delayed merger processes, lack of response to management's actions, and reluctance to dispute unfair treatment, ultimately leading to a loss of trust and confidence in the union's ability to protect and represent its members. Also emphasized is the members' dissatisfaction with the union's handling of disciplinary cases and its failure to provide adequate support and information. There is a strong sentiment of betrayal and disillusionment among the members, who feel that their dues are not translating into effective representation and protection. The analogy of hiring a security service that fails to deliver on its promises is used to illustrate the members' frustration and the disconnect between the union's promises and its actual performance. Overall, the episode underscores the urgent need for improved communication and support mechanisms within the union, with a call for a more responsive and accountable leadership that prioritizes the members' concerns and actively engages in addressing their grievances. The lack of effective representation and protection on the workroom floor is a central issue, prompting a plea for a more accessible and supportive network for members to seek help and address workplace challenges. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

In this episode, Corey talks about contract negotiations with a guest, Mike Caref. Corey then goes over the 2023 contract negotiations, talking about the changes that have been made since the 2019 contract negotiations. They discuss pay, full-time assignments, mandatory overtime, transfers, work schedules, and contract compliance. Mike gives his perspective on these issues, and they discuss his own views on how the current contract is not working well for letter carriers. He emphasizes the need for better pay, full-time assignments, and an end to mandatory overtime. He argues that the contract should be more favorable to letter carriers and that the postal service should take the needs of its employees into account. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey discusses a grievance filed in 2014 regarding the placement of hard plastic trays used for mail delivery. Management instructed carriers to store the trays away from their cases, contradicting past practice and the M-39 handbook. The grievance, supported by the union, argues that management is violating Articles 3, 5, 15, and 19 of the national agreement by unilaterally changing procedures. The union contends that past practice allows trays to be kept at the carrier's case. The episode highlights management's argument based on Article 3, which allows for management rights to direct work, and cites OSHA concerns as justification. The arbitrator's decision, referenced in the grievance, agreed with the union's assertion that the Eastern Area redline policy is no longer in use. Corey emphasizes the importance of using the grievance procedure as a tool to dig a "hole" for management to demonstrate the need for a change in their behavior. He also urges shop stewards to look beyond the grievance process, to take care of carriers, offer EAP support, and to not allow despair to set in. The episode also addresses listener feedback, including requests to use less jargon and to improve podcast structure. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey discusses relevancy letters, removals, and formal step A meetings. He emphasizes the importance of the formal step A process as a critical juncture for building a strong case. Corey recounts a recent conversation with a carrier facing a removal, highlighting the importance of thoroughly understanding the controlling documents and asking clarifying questions to ensure a strong position. He emphasizes the importance of the carrier being aware of their rights and knowing they are correct, regardless of management's rhetoric. He also cautions against answering questions directly from management without union representation present. Corey details a specific removal case, where management used scanner data to justify the disciplinary action, and criticizes the management approach. He stresses the crucial role of a shop steward, branch president, and business agent in defending carriers' rights. He criticizes the perceived cowardice of some business agents and urges them to be proactive shepherds rather than passive sheep herders in representing their members. He also dissects a specific relevancy letter from management, highlighting the union's rights regarding information requests under Articles 17 and 31 of the National Agreement. Corey asserts that management does not dictate relevancy; the union does. He discusses cases using pertinent arbitration decisions, like those from Arbitrators August and Mittenthal, to demonstrate that his approach aligns with established precedents. Crucially, Corey emphasizes the importance of thoroughly examining the reasoning behind the management's position. Finally, he addresses listeners' concern about quarterly overtime and future topics. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

The episode is about residual mail and the DPS process. Corey discusses several arbitration cases related to this issue, highlighting the disagreement between the union and management about how residual mail should be handled. He emphasizes that management is often incorrect in their interpretation of the rules and that the union has successfully argued against them in several cases. Corey encourages viewers to use the resources provided (including the JCAM and arbitration decisions) to build their own cases and to reach out to the union for assistance if they have any questions. c-35023 c-34279 c-34983 c-33659 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode is a discussion about how to identify and grieve violations of the union contract when a 204-B supervisor is performing bargaining unit work. Corey emphasizes the importance of keeping detailed records and using resources like the JCAM and DOIS reports to build a strong case. They also encourage viewers to get involved in their local union and to be mindful of the need for strong leadership. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

A discussion between Corey and Brian Renfroe, executive vice president for the National Association of Letter Carriers. They discuss several topics, including: The new "TIAREAP" process: This new process uses GPS data to track and evaluate carriers' routes, which has led to some conflict with carriers feeling watched. The upcoming contract negotiations: They discuss the importance of pushing for an all-career workforce, higher starting pay, and a full cost-of-living adjustment. The NALCs relationship with the Postal Service: They discuss how the NALCs relationship with management is professional, but disagreements still occur. The role of the Regional Grievance Assistants (RGAs): They discuss the importance of RGAs in supporting small branches and their role in handling grievances. The "redline" policy: This policy prohibits carriers from doing certain things, which can be a point of contention. The lack of union representation in some areas: They discuss the importance of strong representation and how to address it. They also discuss the importance of the upcoming election for the NALCs leadership. They encourage viewers to vote and be informed about the issues. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode features Mike Caref, Business Agent Region 3. Caref discusses remedies for non-compliance grievances and disciplinary actions for failure to follow instructions, particularly regarding mandatory overtime and NS days. He highlights a recent arbitration win (case #35858) in Chicago which established a $2,500 automatic penalty for future non-compliance with grievance settlements, cease and desist orders, and step B decisions. The episode also details past issues with the postal service not honoring continuation of pay (COP) requests. Caref emphasizes that employees should follow instructions, but not beyond their work hours or when it is unsafe, and that leaving work before completing their shift is not insubordination. The episode concludes with announcements about future guests, including Brian Renfroe, and encouraging listeners to engage through social media. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode discusses two prevalent issues among postal workers: management's imposition of a 5-minute PM office time limit and the prohibition of casing Special Handling Parcels (SPRs). Corey emphasizes the importance of diligently filing grievances against these directives, citing examples of both successful and unsuccessful cases. He advocates for a strong union stance, arguing that every grievance, no matter how challenging, should be pursued. He recounts personal experiences, including a case where a carrier was essentially forced to work off the clock due to these restrictions. Corey stresses the need for stewards, formal representatives, and branch presidents to actively support and represent carriers, highlighting the importance of detailed investigation, thorough preparation, and unwavering support for employees. The episode concludes with advice on how to effectively grieve these issues. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on the grievance process regarding management's practice of changing start times. Corey emphasizes the importance of a "searing, zealous, torrid love affair" for letter carriers among union representatives to effectively represent their needs. He laments the perceived failure of some union representatives to adequately address workers' concerns, citing instances where grievances were not filed or resolved, leading to negative outcomes for employees. He discusses a recent case involving a carrier's removal and the subsequent lack of union support, highlighting the critical need for representatives to actively file and pursue grievances. The episode then transitions into a detailed explanation of how to grieve start-time changes. Corey provides a template grievance, outlining the required elements, including an issue statement referencing Article 5 and Section 122 of the M-39 handbook and Article 19 of the national agreement. He also stresses the importance of supporting documentation, like carrier statements and management communication, and using arbitration decisions as instructive models for formulating grievances. He highlights the significance of the arbitrator's requirement that management demonstrate justification for any schedule change. The episode concludes with a summary of several arbitration case precedents, emphasizing the 80% mail-availability criterion as a key element in contesting start-time modifications and the arbitrator's interpretation of management's responsibilities in maintaining fair schedules. Corey repeatedly encourages listeners to utilize readily available resources like templates, arbitration decisions, and support from their union representatives to successfully challenge these management actions. c-33356 c-34444 c-23986 c-29717 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

In this episode, Corey discusses TIAREAP and redline policy, two policies that affect mail carriers and their routes. He gives a detailed explanation of TIAREAP and reads a document from a friend about it, outlining the process, the use of digital street review (DSR), and the various events that are automatically deducted or flagged. He then addresses the redline policy, sharing how a manager told other managers that the M-41 handbook has been amended, removing fixed office time. He emphasizes that this is false and that there is still a 33-minute and 43-minute fixed office time. He advises listeners to be aware of management's attempts to circumvent these policies and to be prepared to file grievances if necessary. Finally, he discusses a disciplinary case and uses it as an example to emphasize that discipline should be corrective and not punitive. He reminds listeners that the contract trumps all opinions and that they should never be scared into accepting discipline that is not justified. C-32369 Talmadge C-30421 Roberts http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey starts by acknowledging that he messed up the audio for last week's episode, which was very long, and apologizes for the inconvenience. He then moves on to discuss a few things he wants to address. He talks about the importance of union stewards and how they can help protect carriers' rights, especially during investigations and grievances. He encourages listeners to be informed about the grievance procedure and to stand up for themselves when they believe their rights are being violated. Corey shares a story about an incident where a manager tried to intimidate a union steward and how the steward stood his ground, ultimately exposing management's dishonesty. He then dives into a detailed discussion of the "3996," a form used to request overtime or auxiliary assistance, and provides specific examples of how this form can be used to challenge management actions. He also addresses the issue of management manipulating or misinterpreting data used to determine overtime and work hours, encouraging listeners to be vigilant in checking those records and to file grievances when necessary. Corey ends the episode by encouraging listeners to stay informed, stand up for their rights, and to fight against any form of tyranny or injustice. C-25035 M-01366 M-01769 C-29394 M-00304 M-01444 C-33998 M-00829 M-00536 C-29981 A-B M-01458 M=01216 C-31406 M-00326 C-32470 M-01664 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This podcast episode focuses on the importance of union stewards and their role in protecting the rights of city letter carriers. JB discusses the grievance procedure, highlighting the different steps involved, from informal meetings to arbitration. This episode also addresses the issue of CCA's (City Carrier Assistants) being assigned to perform rural carrier work, emphasizing that this is a violation of the collective bargaining agreement. JB encourages listeners to be informed about their rights and to file grievances if they are experiencing any unfair treatment from management. JB also discusses the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on staffing and the challenges of ensuring that rural carriers receive the necessary support. He encourages listeners to stay vigilant in protecting their rights and to use the available resources, such as the JCAM, to ensure fair treatment. Grievance procedure/process @42 min CCA doing rural carrier work @1:14 workhour workload reports @2:06 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey discusses the importance of union stewards, the difficulties of dealing with management, and the ongoing battle between city and rural carriers. He emphasizes the need for education among city letter carriers and encourages them to stand up for their rights. Corey also talks about his personal experience with blood clots and how this led to his temporary removal from the National Convention. He then discusses several memos and agreements related to city and rural carrier jurisdiction, highlighting the complexities and challenges faced by carriers in both city and rural settings. Overall, the episode is a passionate plea for city letter carriers to stay informed, fight for their rights, and support each other in the face of a difficult work environment. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode is a midweek edition focusing on urgent safety concerns. Corey addresses a nationwide scanner message stating "When possible, take approved rest breaks to beat the heat." He strongly urges listeners to grieve this message every time they see it, calling it "deadly" because it implies carriers are limited to scheduled breaks, which is dangerous in extreme heat, especially for new hires (CCAs) who may not know they can take breaks as needed for heat. He recommends grieving it as a class action under Article 14 and Article 19 via M-01860, demanding a cease and desist and a stand-up talk clarifying break policies. For repeated offenses, he suggests including Article 15 and seeking $50 per carrier per day until the message is retracted and clarified. The episode then shifts to dissecting a redacted investigative interview and subsequent disciplinary action (letter of warning for improper conduct). The discipline stemmed from a carrier taking lunch late and bringing mail back to the office. Corey critiques the process, arguing the investigative interview was biased from the start, accusatory, and failed to specify what rule was violated regarding bringing mail back. He highlights issues like the unreasonable instruction to take all breaks before 3 pm, potential violations of Article 16, 14, and 19, and the lack of clarity on protocol when unable to reach management to report bringing mail back. He points out inconsistencies between the investigative interview's focus on "failure to follow instructions" and the discipline's charge of "improper conduct," as well as the introduction of new ELM sections in the discipline that were not mentioned in the interview. He emphasizes the need to scrutinize every word and detail in such documents to build a strong defense. Finally, Corey reiterates the importance of protecting CCAs in the heat and encourages union members to educate themselves and fight for their rights, despite potential management backlash. He clarifies his non-political stance and commitment to the union, emphasizing his role is strictly educational and supportive of union members, particularly in safety matters and fighting unjust management practices. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode delves into a lengthy discussion of the M-01983 memo, which outlines the Technology Integrated Alternate Route Evaluation and Adjustment Process (TIEREAP). Corey begins by addressing listener feedback on his previous episode, emphasizing his dedication to the NALC and his desire for fair representation of letter carriers. He then transitions to the memo, detailing its extensive contents, including the process of appointing joint NALC-USPS teams for route evaluations and adjustments, data analysis procedures, and carrier consultations. Crucially, Corey highlights the importance of carriers being aware of potential management attempts to establish standards for timeframes in street work. The memo describes various data analysis methods, including digital street review (DSR) and work hour workload reports, and emphasizes the need for accurate data entry. Corey emphasizes the significance of carrier consultations and the rights afforded to carriers during these sessions. He specifically notes potential issues related to management using the memo to justify discipline for work-related activities. He stresses the importance of carrier knowledge and participation in the process, especially noting the need to challenge management's interpretation of standards. The episode concludes with a discussion of the memo's details, encouraging listeners to become knowledgeable and prepared to defend their rights in the face of potential abuses. Corey repeats his dedication to his colleagues and the union and promises further episodes addressing relevant NALC issues. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode delves into Corey's response to new USPS memos (M-01982 and M-01984) concerning route adjustments, connecting it to a past grievance experience. Corey recounts a previous grievance where he possessed damning evidence of management using covert surveillance techniques, but the case was inexplicably dropped by the union, which he believes was due to internal collusion. This experience fuels his current anger towards the new memos, which he views as legitimizing the same surveillance tactics he fought against previously. He believes these memos, enabling management to scrutinize carrier data, are a direct result of his lost grievance. Corey plans to read the memos verbatim in the current and following episode, despite anticipating listener boredom, to make the information readily available. He emphasizes the importance of carriers keeping their scanners on their person at all times to avoid misinterpretations of their work activity. Corey shares insights from a colleague whose station already underwent this route adjustment process, highlighting that management rigorously challenges any deviations from what they consider standard times (e.g., loading time), even using scanner malfunctions as excuses to disregard data. This colleague's experience also revealed a concerning instance where, after the route adjustment review, a management representative stated they could not discipline based on the data but would grant management access to it. The union representative's inaction in this situation infuriates Corey. Corey encourages carriers to actively protect their routes, fight for every detail, and use the provided memos and contract language as tools in their defense, emphasizing that carriers must be their own advocates. Finally, Corey clarifies his passion stems from a deep-seated love and loyalty for his fellow letter carriers, whom he considers his family. He expresses strong disapproval of cowardice within the union and urges a more proactive and aggressive approach to fighting for better working conditions. The episode ends with a promise to read memos 01982 and 01984, and memo 01983 the following week, with a final reminder to prioritize safety and self-care, especially during periods of extreme heat. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey is discussing the 12 and 60-hour rule and how management is attempting to abuse it using new memos and the PET (Performance Engagement Tool) system. He stresses that the rule is absolute and that management cannot require carriers to work beyond those limits. Corey also discusses the importance of filing grievances when management tries to force carriers to accept these new standards, highlighting previous cases where arbitrators have sided with the union. They emphasize the importance of challenging management practices that are based on flawed systems and that the union has the power to protect its members against such abuses. Corey encourages carriers to be vigilant and to fight for their rights, reminding them that the 8190 grievance form is a powerful tool for protecting their time and pay. They also advise carriers to be aware of the tactics management might use to intimidate them, but to stand firm and continue to fight for what is right. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey celebrates the one-year anniversary of their podcast, "From A to Arbitration," which focuses on educating letter carriers about their rights. They express gratitude to their guests and those who have supported them. The main topic of this episode is PET, a performance engagement tool used by management to estimate carriers' daily workload and potentially discipline them if they don't meet the projected time. Corey argues that PET is a flawed system that does not take into account various factors, like weather conditions or the specific makeup of the mail, and is often used by management to unfairly penalize carriers. Corey provides examples of grievances that have been filed against PET and won, and stresses the importance of educating carriers on their rights and how to challenge management practices based on PET. He also emphasizes that the union must be bold in fighting for its members' rights against these unfair practices. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on route protection for letter carriers, specifically regarding the new scanners and the time standards associated with them. Corey discusses a PowerPoint presentation created by a fellow carrier, Steve Hedgecock, highlighting the problems with the new scanners and how they can be used to unfairly penalize carriers. He emphasizes that management is trying to cut time and that carriers should be aware of their contractual rights. He highlighted specific contractual provisions that can be used to fight against unfair practices, such as the requirement for management to provide all necessary equipment and the lack of a street standard for delivery time. He encourages carriers to be proactive in protecting their routes and to file grievances if they are treated unfairly. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on protecting routes, addressing concerns about a new scanner's performance and potential issues with timekeeping and delivery accuracy. Corey emphasizes the importance of shop stewards in filing grievances to counter management's attempts to cut worker time and resources. Examples of recent scanner problems and managerial directives, such as a mandate against taking breaks during extreme heat, are cited as potential violations of worker rights and safety. Corey stresses the power of the grievance form 8190 as a crucial tool for addressing these issues and countering managerial pressure. Specific examples of past successful grievances regarding curbside delivery procedures, preventing carriers from working off the clock, handling packages, and resolving issues with carrier instructions are discussed to provide examples for listeners. Corey reiterates the need for shop stewards to be prepared and proactive in protecting workers' rights, emphasizing the importance of building a strong case file. The episode concludes with encouragement for listeners to use available resources, like the show's website and social media, to gain access to relevant information and support for their own efforts. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on the issue of being charged with AWOL (Absent Without Leave) on a non-scheduled day. Corey explains that this is an impossible situation because you cannot be charged with AWOL if you are not scheduled to work that day. He also discusses the importance of documenting any interactions with management, especially when it comes to requests for leave or when being accused of AWOL. He urges listeners to file grievances if management refuses to acknowledge their rights or if they are being treated unfairly. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on the challenging topic of dealing with toxic coworkers in the workplace. Corey emphasizes that while addressing such issues is ideally management's responsibility, shop stewards sometimes need to intervene to protect their "flock." Corey highlights the Postal Service's Policy on Workplace Harassment, specifically Publication 552, as a resource for understanding management's obligations in maintaining a respectful work environment. Practical advice is provided on navigating difficult conversations with both management and the toxic coworker, including the use of written statements from affected employees, invoking relevant policies, and filing grievances when necessary. Ultimately, the episode underscores the challenging balance between protecting individual employees and advocating for the well-being of the entire workforce. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode discusses ergonomics in the workplace, focusing on a 2014 grievance filed by Corey against management. Corey highlights the union's efforts to implement ergonomic policies, contrasting them with management's perceived disregard for worker safety, prioritizing cost-cutting over safety measures. The episode details numerous instances where management, despite agreements, failed to prioritize worker safety, leading to unsafe conditions. Corey details specific examples, like the removal of mail tubs and the use of wire cages, and Corey contends that these changes increased the risk of musculoskeletal disorders. The episode emphasizes Corey's focus on protecting their colleagues and the union's role in advocating for safety, as well as the documentation and evidence presented in the grievance. The episode concludes with Corey's frustration with management's indifference towards employee safety, Corey's assertion that workers are ultimately responsible for their safety, and the importance of workers standing up for themselves. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on the importance of carrier safety, particularly in relation to heat-related illnesses. Corey starts by wishing a happy retirement to his mentor, Lou Drass, whom he considers a juggernaut in the union world. He emphasizes the importance of mentorship and the need for strong leadership within the union. Corey then dives into the topic of heat safety, using a recent grievance filed by a carrier as an example. The grievance stemmed from a station manager who told carriers they could only take one break in the heat, even during periods of excessive heat. This decision was challenged by the shop steward, and the DRT (Dispute Resolution Team) ultimately ruled in favor of the carrier. The episode details several important M-documents and OSHA citations related to heat safety. M-document 1860 details a memorandum of understanding between the USPS and the National Association of Letter Carriers on heat abatement programs. OSHA citations regarding heat illness, including the definition of heat exhaustion and heat stroke, and the necessity to call 911 in case of a heat-related emergency, are also discussed. Corey strongly encourages listeners to educate themselves about these documents and the relevant laws, and to be prepared to file grievances to protect their safety. He emphasizes that management often prioritizes numbers over safety and encourages carriers to always prioritize their own safety. The episode is a powerful reminder of the need for union members to be informed and to stand up for their rights, particularly when it comes to protecting their health and well-being. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This podcast episode features JB, who expresses concern about management overreach and emphasizes the importance of union education. JB criticizes management's reliance on flawed data systems like DOIS and PET for evaluating worker efficiency and approving overtime requests. He encourages listeners to be aware of their rights, including the right to grieve unfair treatment and to challenge management's use of these systems as the sole basis for disciplinary action or overtime approval. JB recounts his experiences challenging unfair management practices, highlighting the power of utilizing grievance procedures, and urges fellow postal workers to be proactive in protecting their rights. He concludes by advising listeners to stay informed about their rights, to document everything, and to stand together against unfair treatment. JB starts @ 16 min Dois/fixed office time @ 33 min PET @ 55 min 3996/reporting requirements @ 1hr 30min Red line policy @ 2hr 30 min http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode of From A to Arbitration, hosted by Corey, features a special guest, Mike Caref, a National Business Agent from Region 3. The episode begins with Corey talking about the upcoming episode, which will feature JB, a National Business Agent from Region 3, who will be discussing the DOIS, 3996, and the PET. Corey then goes on to talk about a couple of grievances that he has received about votes, shop stewards, and the process of voting on shop stewards. He discusses how he would recommend that the shop steward is present during the vote count, as a way to ensure transparency. Corey then brings up a topic about CCAs being used to case mail on Sunday. He talks about how this is a grievance that he has experienced, but says it is a tricky one to handle. He then gives a personal anecdote about his experience with this issue, and how he had to file a grievance for the right to be able to touch each piece of mail to ensure that it was going to the correct address. He talks about how some of the carriers were spending four minutes per stop because of this, which is an unbelievable amount of time. He encourages listeners to contact him if they experience this issue. The majority of the podcast features a discussion about the Mittenthal award, which was a landmark arbitration ruling. The ruling specifically dealt with the use of emergency placement, which is the practice of placing a letter carrier on non-duty, non-pay status, without pay, without first giving them written notice of the charge against them. This award was significant, because it clarifies the process that is required for the Postal Service to use emergency placement. Mike Caref speaks in detail about the case, going through the specifics of the Mittenthal award, and then giving further detail from a subsequent arbitration ruling on the same topic. He goes into the steps that must be taken for the Postal Service to utilize emergency placement, and also the necessary details that should be included in the written notice given to the employee. The podcast ends with reiterating that emergency placement is discipline, and not administrative action. He then encourages listeners to educate themselves about the topic and make sure that they are familiar with the rules and regulations that govern their work. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on mitigating factors in grievances and a specific grievance related to unsafe scanner messages. Corey discusses the importance of worker safety, emphasizing that management's concern for safety is often only apparent during arbitration proceedings. He highlights a new shop steward's dedication and initiative, praising her approach to representing colleagues. Corey delves into the definition of mitigating factors, using personal anecdotes and examples from past grievances to illustrate factors such as a miscarriage, loss of a loved one, or an apology as potential mitigating circumstances. He emphasizes the importance of documenting these factors and utilizing them to support colleagues in need. The episode then transitions to a grievance concerning a recurring scanner message about taking approved rest breaks to combat the heat. Corey argues that this message, while seemingly innocuous, can potentially put workers in harm's way by encouraging them to wait for "approved" breaks instead of taking breaks as needed in extreme heat. He details the steps taken to grieve the message, emphasizing the importance of filing grievances for any potential danger, specifically citing Article 14 of the National Agreement as the basis for the grievance, and advocating for further support and education among union members. The episode ends by encouraging listeners to be proactive in safeguarding their safety and the safety of their colleagues and highlighting Corey's dedication to protecting fellow workers. C-30679 C-32205 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey talks to shop stewards about the importance of the formal Step A meeting in the grievance process. They emphasize that this step is crucial because it's where cases are often won or lost. He encourages stewards to be thorough in their preparation, to know their arguments well, and to be ready to rebut management's position. They also discuss the importance of having the correct documentation and evidence to support their case. He highlights a few specific examples of how grievances have been handled at the formal Step A level and provides advice on how to handle these situations. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey talks about the importance of the informal Step A meeting in the grievance process. He emphasizes the need for new shop stewards to understand what happens in these meetings and how to prepare themselves. He highlights that management often tries to intimidate stewards in these meetings, and it's important to remember that stewards have protected status. He provides guidance on what to include in a grievance file, the need for documentation and evidence, and how to build a strong case. He also encourages stewards to be assertive and not settle for a weak resolution. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode discusses how to approach grievances related to holiday scheduling. They emphasize the importance of building a strong case file with detailed information, including the holiday schedule, seniority rosters, employee earning statements, and any evidence of a past practice. It highlights the importance of understanding Article 11 of the national agreement and how it differs from Article 8 in the context of holiday scheduling. JB encourages listeners to file grievances if they believe their holiday pay has been denied or if management has not followed the proper scheduling procedure. They also discuss the importance of being organized, documenting everything, and not being afraid to challenge management. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey talks about past practice grievances and how they are often successful in arbitration. He discusses the importance of understanding the concept of past practice and the three elements required to establish a valid past practice: clarity and consistency, longevity and repetition, and acceptability. He also emphasizes the need for good-faith bargaining when management seeks to change a past practice. Corey highlights specific arbitration cases and provides guidance on how to build a case file and navigate these types of grievances. Bahakel C-30984 August C-34447 Talmadge C-34614 Talmadge C-20253 (denied) http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode discusses the concept of "dispatch of value, window of operation" and explains how management uses it to justify violating Article 8 of the national agreement. Corey provides several arbitration decisions, and encourages shop stewards to use this knowledge in their grievance process. He also stresses the importance of having proper staffing levels and how management often fails to do so, which leads to the violation of Article 8. M-01548 The White Pages http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey discusses the concept of dispatch of value, window of operation and how management uses it to justify violating Article 8 of the national agreement. He highlights the importance of understanding this concept and how it can be used to fight management's actions. He analyzes various arbitration decisions to illustrate how arbitrators have ruled on this issue and provide guidance for shop stewards on how to build a case. Corey also discusses the importance of evidence and documentation when fighting against management's actions and how to prepare for an arbitration hearing. Britton C-13181 Dilts C-26675 (don't use as cite. Remedy is crap) Roberts C-31146 August C-32315 Article 8.5.a, 8.5.d, 8.5.f, 8.5.g http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on escalated monetary awards in arbitration cases related to the noncompliance with cease-and-desist orders by management. Corey emphasizes the importance of thorough documentation, including all past decisions, settlements, and relevant documents like M1517 (the Donahoe letter). He encourages listeners to study specific arbitration cases from Lake Charles, highlighting the successful arguments and remedies achieved in those instances, specifically referencing cases 31146, 31269, 31620, 33023 A and B, and 32792. He also provides guidance on formulating strong issue statements and remedies, advocating for the inclusion of Article 15 violations and providing a template for building a compelling case. He concludes by stressing the importance of learning from arbitrators' decisions and understanding their reasoning in awarding escalated monetary awards. M-01517 M-01967 federal court decision Roberts C-34197 Kingsport Mittenthal C-6238 Gamser C-3200 Lake Charles decisions Roberts C-31146, 31269, 33023 A-B Wolitz C-31620, 32792 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on understanding and utilizing escalated monetary awards in grievance arbitrations. Corey emphasizes the importance of documenting past cease and desist orders issued to management as evidence of repeated contract violations. He argues that while the goal is not to financially burden the Postal Service, these awards are sometimes necessary to ensure contract compliance when other avenues, like informal resolutions and prior arbitration decisions, have failed to stop the violations. Corey cites several arbitration decisions, emphasizing Arbitrator Roberts' decision which supports the argument that repeated disregard for cease and desist orders justifies escalating monetary remedies. He concludes by advising listeners on how to effectively build their cases, including providing specific examples of successful arguments and appropriate monetary amounts to request. Roberts C-34731 Maier C-31812 August C-32315 Wolitz C-31620 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

JB joins to discuss the complex issue of "Deems Desirable," a policy allowing supervisors to request medical documentation for absences of three days or less. Leath emphasizes the importance of stewards understanding contractual provisions and building strong cases by gathering evidence like employee attendance records and ERMS reports. He criticizes the arbitrary use of "Deems Desirable" as a blanket policy, advocating for case-by-case application and prior notification of attendance concerns. Drawing upon his own arbitration experience, Leath highlights a successful case where management failed to demonstrate reasonable justification for placing an employee on "Deems Desirable" without prior notice or documented attendance issues. He encourages stewards to familiarize themselves with relevant USPS manuals and proactively gather information to support their arguments when challenging this policy. M-01597 M-00002 ELM 511.42 ELM 513.361 JCAM 10-14 eRMS report 260F0 eRms report 515F0 3972 eRMS leave usage/call in log eRMS key indicator report August C-35201 August C-33650 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey discusses the complexities of "last chance agreements" (LCAs), legal documents that offer employees a final opportunity to maintain employment after serious disciplinary offenses. Corey uses a recent arbitration case involving an employee dismissed for a single, brief tardiness despite 111 days of on-time attendance to illustrate the challenges advocates face when defending employees bound by LCAs. He emphasizes the importance of just cause principles, even in LCA situations, and criticizes management's handling of the case, particularly their failure to provide timely information and alleged witness intimidation. Corey concludes by encouraging other union advocates to rigorously defend employees facing discipline under LCAs. Rentfro C-01760 inequitable discipline Rentfro C- 01030 procedural due process Cohen C-00239 perfection August C-34816 Information Kleine C-10846 LCA August C-35237 LCA Axon C-11112 LCA timeliness Olson C-16970 LCA timeliness Roberts C-16475 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This podcast episode focuses on the Joint Statement on Violence and Behavior in the Workplace, and the importance of knowing the right arguments and remedies to utilize in grievance cases related to this statement. Corey is discussing with his listeners how to build a strong case file and be prepared when dealing with management who might be violating the Joint Statement. He emphasizes that management often tries to avoid responsibility, making the same arguments, regardless of the specific case. Corey advises stewards to gather specific information, including previous arbitration decisions related to the Joint Statement, such as those from Arbitrator Bjork and Arbitrator Britain, to support their arguments. He also emphasizes the need for stewards to be assertive and to not back down when faced with management's attempts to downplay the seriousness of the situation. Overall, Corey aims to empower his listeners with the knowledge and confidence needed to effectively advocate for their members in grievance cases, ensuring that workers are treated with respect and dignity in the workplace. J. Jacobs C-33993 Rule of Evidence #406 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This podcast episode focuses on the Joint Statement on Violence and Behavior in the Workplace. Corey is explaining to shop stewards how to build a strong case file for grievances related to this statement, specifically in instances where management exhibits bullying or harassing behavior. He emphasizes the importance of understanding the Joint Statement and utilizing relevant arbitration decisions to support arguments. Corey highlights a case from Arbitrator Bjork, which establishes that the Joint Statement is a legally binding agreement, and that management's failure to comply constitutes a violation. Corey encourages stewards to take an assertive approach and to be thorough in documenting everything. He provides guidance on finding relevant information, including previous arbitration decisions, workplace climate surveys, and threat assessments. Ultimately, Corey emphasizes the need for stewards to be proactive and prepared, building a strong foundation for their case from the start. He encourages them to be thorough in their research and to seek help if needed. He also advises that stewards should not be afraid to stand up to bullying management and that they should always strive to build a strong case that protects their members. August Hattiesburg C-33831 August Clinton C- 35122 August Relevancy letter decision C-35441 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This podcast episode focuses on the Joint Statement on Violence and Behavior in the Workplace, a crucial document for stewards handling grievance cases involving harassment, intimidation, or bullying by management. Corey emphasizes the importance of understanding the Joint Statement, noting that management often tries to avoid its implications. He recommends that stewards gather specific information, including previous arbitration decisions related to the Joint Statement, such as those from Arbitrators Snow and Britain. He encourages stewards to be proactive and assertive, using the Joint Statement as a tool to hold management accountable for their behavior. He stresses the importance of building a strong case file and utilizing the information to highlight management's patterns of misconduct. The episode serves as a pep rally for stewards, urging them to be prepared and knowledgeable to effectively represent their members and fight against inappropriate behavior by management. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/ JSOV m-1242 JSOV II m-1243 Arbitrator Snow C-15697 Both parties post hearing briefs for Snow decision Article 15 language ELM 665.24 Section 115.4 M-39 Handbook Article 14 District workplace violence/zero tolerance policy Postal service policy on workplace harrasment Arbitrator Bajork C-20643 6th Circuit appeals decision m-1488 District court decision (in transcript section) 4th circuit appeals m-1518 all grievance settlements informal a formal a b-team arbitration any surveys workplace climate surveys threat assesments joint intervention any discipline or adverse action against the manager/supervisor statements Arbitrator August decisions C-33831 C-35122 Arbitrator Maier C-32076

This podcast episode is a follow-up to a previous episode on opting, a process within a union contract that allows eligible employees to take on a vacant assignment. Corey expresses his gratitude to Jason Leeth for creating a comprehensive episode on opting. Corey acknowledges the complexity of the subject, explaining how it affects various aspects of a worker's life, including their livelihood and personal well-being. He also emphasizes the importance of a joint statement, a document that outlines the union's position in a grievance case, and highlights how management often tries to avoid committing to it. The core message of the episode is that stewards must be prepared and proactive when handling grievances related to opting. They should understand the contract provisions, document all requests for information, and be assertive in challenging management's attempts to manipulate the process. Corey shares an example of a successful arbitration case where a manager's bullying tactics were exposed, and the arbitrator ruled in favor of the union. He emphasizes the need for unions to be persistent in advocating for their members' rights. The episode concludes with a reminder that the union is there to support its members and that stewards should be prepared to take a firm stand against any attempts by management to violate the contract. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on the topic of opting in a union contract, specifically on how to navigate the process and avoid common pitfalls. Corey and Jason discuss the intricacies of opting, a process that allows eligible employees to take on a vacant assignment. Eligibility for Opting: Only full-time reserve letter carriers, full-time flexible letter carriers, unassigned regular letter carriers, and city carrier assistants (CCAs) are eligible to opt. Probationary employees and light duty employees cannot opt. The "Hold-Down" Concept: When an individual opts on an assignment, they effectively become the carrier for the duration of the vacancy, even if the original carrier returns early. The Role of Seniority: Seniority plays a crucial role in determining who gets an opt, with full-time employees taking priority over part-time employees and CCAs. The Importance of Documentation: JB stresses the need for stewards to document all opting requests and to ensure that management follows proper procedures. The Concept of "Last Resort": JB highlights that bumping an employee from a hold-down assignment should be a last resort, as it can be a violation of the contract. Key Documents for Opting: JB recommends that stewards familiarize themselves with the JCAM, the Local Memorandum of Understanding (LMOU), and the Vacation Calendar. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on the importance of the informal step A meeting in grievance cases. Corey argues that this initial meeting is crucial, as it's often the first time management reveals their position in writing. He emphasizes the need for shop stewards to be prepared and aggressive in this meeting, encouraging stewards to develop detailed contentions, document everything, and ask for all relevant information. He also stresses the importance of having a core group of trusted colleagues to review information and provide support. Corey provides an example of a recent arbitration case where he successfully challenged management's failure to provide requested information during the informal step A meeting. He highlights how management's lack of preparation and their tendency to change their position at the formal step A meeting demonstrates the importance of being prepared and thorough at the informal level. Corey encourages listeners to embrace the informal step A meeting as an opportunity to be "devastating" in their defense of grievances. By being prepared, assertive, and meticulous in documenting everything, stewards can effectively lay the groundwork for a successful outcome in the grievance process. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on Article 31 of the National Agreement, which governs information requests during grievance cases. Corey explains that this article is closely linked to Article 17, which deals with the right of stewards to access information for grievance processing. Corey emphasizes that when a shop steward encounters a situation where management fails to provide requested information, they should always include a violation of Article 31 and Article 17 in their issue statement. Corey further explains that management is obligated to provide "all relevant information" necessary for the union to process grievances. This includes information outside of the bargaining unit, and the union has the right to determine what information is relevant. Corey then provides an example of a relevancy letter, a document used by management to challenge the union's request for information. He reiterates that the union has the right to determine what information is relevant and that management cannot dictate what information is needed. He also provides a successful case from Arbitrator Mittenthal C-10363, which supports the union's right to information. Finally, he encourages listeners to document all information requests and to be persistent in obtaining the information they need, emphasizing that a violation of Articles 17 and 31 can be a powerful argument in a grievance case. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode discusses the importance of information requests in grievance cases. Corey argues that failure to provide requested information constitutes a serious violation of the collective bargaining agreement, potentially leading to the dismissal of the grievance. Corey emphasizes that stewards have a right to investigate, adjust, and process grievances, including reviewing relevant documents, files, and records, as well as interviewing employees, supervisors, and witnesses. They also have the right to request time on the clock to conduct these activities. Corey encourages listeners to be assertive and request all necessary information, even if it requires going to higher levels of management or even the Office of Inspector General (OIG). He provides examples of relevant documents and the importance of maintaining copies of information requests. He also highlights instances where management has denied information requests and the consequences that followed. Corey ultimately concludes that failure to provide information is a major due process violation and that stewards should be prepared to fight for their right to access it. He encourages listeners to document all requests and to be persistent in their pursuit of the information they need. Mittenthal C-10363 August C-33968 August C-34816 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on the principle of "corrective rather than punitive" discipline. Corey argues that while arbitrators often interpret "corrective discipline" as synonymous with "progressive discipline," true corrective action requires management to actively help employees improve their performance rather than simply issuing escalating punishments. Corey emphasizes management's obligation to manage, using examples like an employee disciplined for incorrectly filling out a form without being given proper instruction and another punished for unauthorized overtime without management investigating the root cause. He advocates for union stewards to hold management accountable to the higher standard of corrective discipline and provides specific contractual provisions and arbitration precedent to support this argument. Cohen C-00557 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode is about defending City Carrier Assistants (CCAs) facing disciplinary action by the United States Postal Service. Corey emphasizes that CCAs are particularly vulnerable to discipline because they lack the protections of tenure and a "bank of goodwill." He highlights the principle of "corrective rather than punitive" discipline that applies to CCAs, emphasizing that management is obligated to attempt to correct an employee's behavior before resorting to punishment. He cites several arbitration cases, emphasizing specific contractual language and arbitrator's decisions that support this principle, and encourages listeners to build strong cases by meticulously documenting violations of the principle of corrective discipline. Cohen C-00557 Jacobs C-34761 Jacobs C-34218 Jacobs C-33500 http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey enthusiastically details a federal court decision (M-01967) that upholds the right of the union to seek escalated monetary awards, also referred to as punitive awards, from the USPS in cases of contract violations. The decision stems from an arbitration case in Kingsport, Tennessee, where the arbitrator awarded a substantial sum to the union due to the Postal Service's repeated contractual breaches. Corey emphasizes the importance of this decision, urging listeners to include both the M-01967 document and the Kingsport case (C-04197) in all future grievances involving escalated monetary awards. He views this legal victory as a powerful tool for the union in ensuring future contract compliance from the USPS. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This podcast episode focuses on the fifth of six "just cause" principles in labor arbitration: "Was the disciplinary action taken in a timely manner?" Corey explains that management cannot delay disciplinary action indefinitely and that the discipline must be issued promptly after the offense occurs. He gives several examples of cases where arbitrators ruled that management violated this principle by delaying discipline, and explains how shop stewards can use these cases to defend their members. He encourages shop stewards to be mindful of the timing of disciplinary actions and to challenge any delays as a violation of the just cause principle. Corey emphasizes the importance of this principle as a crucial protection for employees and highlights how it can be used to win grievances. He also encourages listeners to use his provided examples to strengthen their cases and to be proactive in their work as shop stewards. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode continues the discussion of "just cause" principles in labor arbitration. Corey is focusing on the third of six sub-questions related to just cause: "Was a thorough investigation completed?" He explains that this principle is crucial because it protects employees from disciplinary actions based on insufficient investigations. He emphasizes that the investigation needs to be thorough and objective, and that any accusation made should be substantiated by evidence. He also highlights the need for the union to challenge management when they fail to conduct a thorough investigation, particularly when the supervisor or a higher-level manager fails to follow proper procedures. Corey provides several examples of how management has failed to conduct thorough investigations and how these failures can be used to win grievances. He stresses the importance of the shop steward's role in advocating for their brothers and sisters, especially in situations where management is not being fair or transparent. Corey concludes by urging shop stewards to be vigilant and to use their knowledge of just cause principles to defend their union members. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode focuses on the fourth of six "just cause" principles in labor arbitration, emphasizing that a complete investigation encompasses more than just the investigative interview; it includes all steps leading to the disciplinary action. Several examples are given of inadequate investigations, highlighting instances where management failed to ask relevant questions during interviews, added questions and answers after the fact, or cited disciplinary reasons not previously discussed. Corey stresses the employee's right to a fair opportunity to defend themselves against specific charges, emphasizing the need for shop stewards to carefully scrutinize investigative interviews and challenge shortcomings. A particularly explicit example of an inadequate investigation, involving a carrier's use of profanity towards supervisors, is used to illustrate the point. The episode also addresses due process violations, such as the concurring official's presence during the investigative interview, and the importance of raising procedural due process issues during the grievance process. Corey concludes by urging shop stewards to be vigilant in protecting employee rights and ensuring thorough investigations are conducted. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode is about the third of six "just cause" principles in labor arbitration. Corey focuses on the principle of "Is the rule consistently and equitably enforced?" He explains that management often tries to enforce rules inconsistently, and that this inconsistency can be used to challenge their actions. He also encourages listeners to be aware of the "rubber-stamping" of discipline that can happen when a supervisor doesn't actually review a case before approving it. Corey emphasizes that the union needs to hold management accountable for their actions by pointing out these inconsistencies. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

The second of the “just cause” principles, Corey argues that this often-overlooked aspect is crucial when challenging management actions. They emphasize the importance of demonstrating that a rule is not only present but also reasonable in relation to safe and efficient work performance and business efficiency. Corey provides examples of unreasonable rules, such as a requirement to raise one's hand to use the restroom, highlighting how the reasonableness of the rule is the crucial point of contention, rather than simply failing to follow an instruction. The discussion stresses that a supervisor must consider the reasonableness of a rule before initiating disciplinary action, and that a rule's violation is only justifiable if the rule itself is reasonable. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

Corey emphasizes the importance of starting any grievance process with the "just cause" principles, especially focusing on whether a rule exists that the carrier violated. He emphasizes that management frequently cites rules that don't exist or don't apply to the situation. Corey encourages listeners to research any rules cited by management to determine if they are legitimate and to use this information to their advantage during grievance procedures. He uses several examples to illustrate these concepts and also encourages listeners to be proactive and thorough in their work as shop stewards. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This podcast episode is about Article 16.1 of the National Agreement which deals with the "just cause" principle for disciplinary actions. Corey explains that the "just cause" principle requires management to have a fair and provable justification for any disciplinary action. He highlights that Article 16.1 specifies that discipline should be corrective rather than punitive. Corey emphasizes the importance of using the "corrective rather than punitive" language in grievances and encourages listeners to be proactive in challenging management's actions. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

This episode discusses the importance of effectively defending union members facing disciplinary actions. Corey emphasizes the need for shop stewards to act as strong advocates, going beyond basic representation and utilizing all available resources, including specific contract provisions, to build a robust defense. He argues that union representatives should not be "public defenders," content with minimal effort, but rather should meticulously investigate and leverage every aspect of the contract, particularly Article 16, to contest management's claims. Corey highlights the critical section on "Examples of Behavior" within Article 16, emphasizing that these examples are illustrative and do not automatically justify discipline. He provides a case study to illustrate how management failed to prove crucial aspects of a case, specifically regarding a carrier's alleged phone use during an accident. He stresses the need for union representatives to demand evidence and scrutinize management's claims, proving that the behavior was intentional, that the discipline was corrective rather than punitive, and that the action was justified by sufficient evidence. The message is that union members deserve strong advocacy, and shop stewards should not neglect the full scope of available tools to protect them from unwarranted discipline. http://www.fromatoarbitration.com/

C-32824 This episode focuses on Article 16.10 of the National Agreement, which deals with employee disciplinary records and how this article can nullify discipline. Corey explains that management cannot cite disciplinary actions that are older than 2 years against an employee. He argues that management often uses this tactic and shop stewards should be aware of this. Corey also highlights the importance of checking the "request for appropriate action" form to see if management has included any prior discipline in the case file. If they have, and it is over 2 years old, the shop steward should challenge it. “A notice of discipline, which is subsequently fully rescinded, whether by settlement, arbitration award, or independent management action, shall be deemed not to have been initiated for purposes of Article 16, Section 10, and may not be cited or considered in any subsequent disciplinary action.” C-32824 “The service has a history of emphasizing that accidents themselves are not the appropriate basis for discipline without establishing an employee's action. violated a Postal Service Safety Rule of Regulation. As noted in the April 7, 1980 memo by the Senior Assistant Postmaster General Carl Olsacher who wrote in pertinent part, accidents or compensation claims, even when in a manager's view excessive, are not in themselves an appropriate basis for discipline. What must be cited in any such disciplinary action are the actions of an employee which are violations of a postal service safety rule or regulation.” Elkori Elkori how arbitration works - Pg 640 Defenses to Discipline: Pg 26 C-01944 “The employer's case is further followed by the fact that it is violative of that portion of Article 16 of the National Agreement, which provides such discussions may not be cited as an element of a prior adverse record in any subsequent disciplinary action against an employee. The Notice of Removal cites two such discussions as elements of the agreement's past record. These procedural defects cannot be overlooked as being insignificant. They are of serious concern because they are in violation of both the letter and spirit of the national agreement, and importantly, they deprive the agreement of its right to due process. In the absence of due process, the agreements must be sustained without any consideration of its standard merits.”

This episode focuses on Article 16.8, which deals with review of discipline. Corey explains the importance of this article and how it can be used to challenge management decisions. He points out that any disciplinary action, such as a suspension or discharge, must be reviewed and concurred by a manager who is a higher level than the supervisor who initiated the discipline. This review should be independent, not a rubber stamp. He also suggests that if an arbitrator says that a disciplinary action is not a "de minimus" violation, then it is a fatal flaw and management's case may be thrown out.

This episode is about labor arbitration and how to use the M39 handbook, which is the management handbook used by the US Postal Service. Corey explains that section 115 of the M39 handbook deals with discipline and how management should administer it. He emphasizes that management should always make every effort to correct a situation before resorting to disciplinary measures. He also says that management has a responsibility to resolve problems before they become grievances. Corey urges listeners to use this section in their grievance procedures by holding management accountable for their responsibilities as outlined in the M39 handbook.

This episode covers how to challenge management when they use criminal statutes against a carrier in disciplinary actions. Corey advises listeners to research any criminal statutes cited by management, as those statutes may not apply to the specific situation. He explains that in a formal grievance procedure, a carrier's lawyer should argue for a higher standard of proof, such as proof beyond a reasonable doubt, because management is essentially making a criminal accusation.

Corey explains Article 16.6 of the National Agreement, which deals with indefinite suspensions in crime situations. He explains that management can't automatically put someone on indefinite suspension without giving them some notice. He also emphasizes the importance of a "nexus" or connection between the employee's job and the crime for which they were arrested. He concludes by saying that carriers who are in trouble should reach out to their union or their attorney for help. Non-specific references in this episode: Corey references an arbitration where a carrier picked up a package for a customer that contained marijuana. The Postal Inspectors jumped him when he picked it up, and management put him on 16:7 emergency placement rather than 16.6 indefinite suspension crime situation. They did that because the quantum of proof in a 16.7 is much less than a 16.6.

Corey talks about Article 16.7: Emergency Placement. He emphasizes the importance of challenging emergency placements by filing grievances, highlighting four key areas of contention: immediacy (the action must be taken without delay), notification (the employee must be explicitly informed of the emergency placement), a detailed written charge, and the length of the placement (which cannot be indefinite). He supports his arguments with relevant arbitration cases and decisions, urging listeners to utilize this information to better defend themselves and their colleagues against potentially unjust actions by management. C-10146 A&B: Defines what “immediate” is in cases of emergency placement. C-24822: Determines the precedence and justification for emergency situations in a case where a carrier was put on emergency placement for not wearing a seatbelt - a situation that was not imminently dangerous. C-30322: Shows that management failed to specify the reason for emergency placement in the charge. C-32656: Highlights several instances where extended emergency placements were deemed improper.

Jason Atchley returns to discuss unauthorized overtime and discipline arising from it. He discusses what a carrier should do when faced with a workload over 8 hours, and highlights the importance of filling out a 3996, as well as leaving decision-making in management's hands. He mentions that management should be filling out PS Form 1017, “Unauthorized Overtime Report” when overtime is not approved. M-00464: Local management can properly request letter carrier employees to estimate their workload to the best of their ability. When the employees request overtime or auxiliary assistance, the information obtained by the carrier estimation is not intended to be used to discipline carriers or to settle work standards. They highlight specific M-39 provisions, including 134.2, which prohibits management from using covert surveillance tactics, and M-00464, which states that projections cannot be used as the sole basis for discipline. Non-specific references in this episode: Arbitrator Wolowitz: “We must conclude that management failed to give Mr. Alexander clear instructions as to what to do when he could not complete his assigned delivery within eight hours. Since he thought those were his instructions, he brought the mail back, he did the best to follow his instructions as he understood them.” The removal was rescinded and expunged. (LOOK UP 0326, 1444, 1664, 1769)

Corey welcomes Jason Atchley to this episode. They discuss unauthorized overtime and how to defend against discipline related to it. Jason explains that there are two competing theories on discipline: single-track (where any violation can lead to immediate discipline) and multi-track (where discipline is progressive). The podcast focuses on the multi-track theory, which is based on the language of Article 16 of the JCAM, and emphasizes that discipline should be corrective, not punitive. The podcast encourages shop stewards to be proactive in challenging unfair disciplinary actions, check their past record for previous discussions or discipline, and to ensure their members understand their rights and protections. Non-specific references in this episode: Arbitrator Glenda August: A letter carrier involved in an accident, management put him on 16:7 and removed him. The carrier had prior attendance discipline, and a prior accident, and in this situation did not immediately report the accident. The arbitrator makes the differentiation that even though the carrier was involved in a prior accident, the discipline was for him failing to report the accident. She also states the grievant's prior disciplinary history was not all related to safety infractions and the mistakes made in the accident at issue were not so egregious as to rise to the level of removal.

***GET C-01928*** Corey discusses how to defend carriers in charges related to the disease of alcohol and/or drug addiction. He emphasizes that the union should advocate for a corrective, rather than a punitive, approach when dealing with carriers facing discipline due to alcohol or drug abuse, as outlined in Article 35 of the collective bargaining agreement. He advises shop stewards to encourage the carrier to seek help through the EAP (Employee Assistance Program) first and foremost. Corey also stresses the importance of challenging management when they use covert surveillance of carriers on the street (M-39 134.2) and when they fail to follow the JCAM's requirement to promptly notify the branch president after an accident (41.3P). He warns that management often uses these tactics to unfairly discipline carriers and that shop stewards must be vigilant in defending their rights. C-01928: “What then, are the factors which would allow an arbitrator to mitigate the offense committed by the alcoholic which led to his removal from the postal service to order that he be reinstated by the postal service?” C-33598 A&B: “As I've stated many times, there are certain deeds that certainly deserve removal action even on the first occurrence. Acts such as theft or involving physical violence provide only a few examples. And based on the language of the parties agreement, I'm of the considered opinion that not every case involving drug or alcohol abuse necessarily fit in the same category. C-02371: “A careful review of the evidence convinces this arbitrator that the grievant's alcoholism was primarily responsible for the misconduct giving rise to his discharge. That the grievant is an alcoholic and has been one for sometime is undisputed. [...] The arbitrator is convinced in this case that but for grievant's drinking problem, he would not have committed the very foolish and serious acts involved. The evidence indicates that he now fully appreciates the problem and, through great personal effort, has complied with the requirements of the rehabilitation program and maintained sobriety for a long period of time. The record in this case, including grievant's straightforward testimony, indicates that the prognosis for the future is good. These factors along with grievant's twenty years of service persuade this arbitrator that discharge was too severe in this case. This does not mean that limits to which any employer can be expected to go help an alcoholic employee overcome his problem. The time does come when an employer may reasonably conclude that its efforts to encourage rehabilitation have failed and that prospects for substandard improvement are so slim that the employment relationship must be terminated.” EAP provides free confidential counseling to all postal employees and their family members by trained outside professionals. It has confidentiality with a strict code of ethics and is easily accessible by calling 1-800-EAP-4YOU (1-800-327-4968) or visit https://usps.ndbh.com/EAP for more information. Non-specific references in this episode: Corey references an arbitration defending a gentleman struggling with methamphetamine addiction, where the arbitrator ruled in favor of the carrier, emphasizing that the carrier had already sought help and was making progress. Corey references an arbitration where a carrier was passed out at his station, and police and EMT were involved. The carrier asked for help and wrote a statement stating such, and management mocked the carrier in their opening statement. The arbitrator made a bench decision without getting to the merits of the case - she brought him back. Corey references a decision from Linda de Leon Kelin, where a carrier left his route, bought alcohol, and became drunk. The grievant was given a final chance to salvage his employment.

Corey discusses backing, stationary events, and street observations, focusing on how to use specific provisions in the M-39 handbook to challenge management actions. This episode speaks on the importance that carriers ask for union representation when management questions them about stationary and backing events, and educating carriers on how to respond to questions about occurrences on street time. He also stresses the importance of M-39 134: Street Management, section 2, which prohibits management from spying or using covert techniques to observe carriers during street management. This, coupled with M-1458 stating MSP data may not constitute the sole basis for disciplinary action, is the main defense utilized in stationary event discipline. Management must observe time-wasting practices or improper procedure and must make themselves known to the carrier. The only individuals who can conduct covert surveillance of carriers are those within the Office of Inspector General (OIG). Corey also asserts that stewards should ask for PS Form 4584 during discipline for street events, which may further prove a violation of the M-39. Arbitrator L. Wolitz C-32778: “We agree with the union that [...] M-39 134.22 (Spying/covert techniques) is directly related to working conditions.” “Furthermore, we find that the information gathered as a result of the observation of letter carrier Martin Smith is fruit of a poison tree and therefore must be deleted from all records of the postal service and carrier Smith.” References In This Episode: Corey references a carrier in his station where management called and accused him of backing, but the location in question was a turnaround driveway.

This episode discusses the importance of using tenure as an argument against discipline. He encourages listeners to use the "bank of goodwill," which refers to years of good service, in their arguments. Arbitrators often hesitate to discipline long-term carriers due to their tenure. He suggests including seniority dates on the PS Form 8190 to inform the advocate of the carrier's tenure. He urges listeners to use the "bank of goodwill" as a strong argument in any discipline case. In This Episode: An arbitration for a carrier with a letter of warning for attendance, in which the arbitrator said management failed to recognize the grievant's 33 years of service. Bank of Good Will: Page 44 of Defenses to Discipline Case number 3587: Grievant served the employer for over 8 years without discipline. C5138 A&B: Carrier followed and harassed by a manager, the carrier assaulted the manager, but her 14-year exemplary work record coupled with the circumstances of the incident led the arbitrator to reduce her removal to a reinstatement without loss of seniority or benefits, and back pay less a 30-day disciplinary suspension. Elkouri and Elkouri - How Arbitration Works, pp 641: Length of Service with a Company; “Long service with a company particularly if unblemished, is a definite factor in the employee's favor when his discharge is reviewed through arbitration. Arbitrators have recognized that the loss of seniority may work great hardship on the employee and that it is not conducive to the improvement of relations between other workers and management.

**PAGE 16-3 pg 254 JCAM examples of behavior** Corey continues his discussion on how to defend carriers against discipline after an accident, this time focusing on the concept of "corrective rather than punitive" discipline, as outlined in Article 16 of the JCAM. He again advises stewards if the branch president was not notified, it's a violation of due process. He also encourages shop stewards to challenge any claims that the accident was serious in nature, as the 1769 form requires a determination of seriousness. Corey also affirms that management has the burden of proof, and that they must prove an act was intentional. He mentions an accident is not sufficient to warrant automatic suspension or revocation of driving privileges, or automatic application of discipline (Article 29). In This Episode: A carrier gave their phone to management - don't do that.

Corey continues to discuss how to defend carriers against discipline related to accidents. He emphasizes the importance of Article 41.3P of the JCAM, which requires management to promptly notify the branch president after a vehicle accident. Failure to do so violates due process and provides a strong argument for the carrier. He highlights two boxes on PS Form 1769, “Serious Accident” and “Preventative Action”, as they can be used as defenses to discipline if management filled them out improperly. He encourages shop stewards to be vigilant in advocating for their carriers in accident-related grievances, and to question management's “thorough investigation.” In This Episode: A carrier knocking a basketball goal over and breaking a mirror, and management's dramatization in their report. A carrier with a roll-away run-away who did not report it. Removal was revoked in arbitration due to the way management wrote up the PS Form 1769 ***GET THE PS FORM*** & C-30421

This episode is the first in a series of episodes focusing on accidents and how to defend carriers against management actions after an accident. Corey highlights the importance of union representation at the scene of an accident, noting that management often tries to gather information and build a case against the carrier without giving them the opportunity to be present or to have representation. He emphasizes the importance of Article 41.3P, which requires management to promptly notify the branch president after a vehicle accident, and argues that failure to do so is a violation of due process.

Corey continues discussing attendance-related discipline, specifically focusing on the concept of "deemed desirable and restricted sick leave." He explains that management uses this to discipline carriers, but it's often a weak argument. He points out that the ELM provision 513.361 states that a carrier is only required to provide documentation for their absences if they are on restricted sick leave or if management deems it necessary for the protection of the Postal Service. He advises shop stewards to challenge these claims, especially when a carrier was not notified of being placed on "deemed desirable." Corey highlights the importance of understanding national arbitration decisions related to discipline, namely the Vera d Bugg case, a landmark case in attendance arbitration, and suggests using it as a strong argument against management's claims, as it utilizes a percentage of attendance vs absences. He encourages shop stewards to ensure that carriers are aware of their rights and to be proactive in challenging inaccurate or unfair disciplinary actions.

Corey discusses a specific type of attendance-related discipline, "deems desirable and restricted sick leave." He points out that management often tries to circumvent the process by simply stating that the carrier was given a discussion about their absences, even if this isn't accurate. He highlights the importance of challenging these claims by the shop steward, suggesting the use of the ELM (Employee and Labor Relations Manual) provision 513.361 to support their arguments. He encourages shop stewards to educate carriers about these regulations and to challenge any instances where a formal discussion wasn't given. Corey also encourages shop stewards to look for discrepancies between attendance records and the reasons for discipline. He emphasizes that the charge must be accurate and that the carrier must be given an opportunity to defend themselves against it, and reminds listeners that discipline must be corrective in nature.

Corey talks about the importance of attendance-related discipline in the grievance process. He points out the low success rate of the union as well as the difficulty of these cases, suggesting they are often won or modified in arbitration. He encourages shop stewards to challenge the validity of any "official discussion" claimed by management, as a formal discussion is required for minor offenses, and to ensure the carrier is fully aware of their attendance record and attendance reviews (or lack thereof). It is important to consult with the carrier before an investigative interview, and Corey mentions how to handle management and acknowledging management responsibilities. He also emphasizes the need to be assertive and fight for the carrier, understanding that they might be going through a difficult personal situation.

This episode focuses on the charge and discipline process in labor grievances. Corey emphasizes the importance of scrutinizing the charge itself, ensuring it is accurate and supported by the documentation provided by management. He advises shop stewards to examine the charge thoroughly, ensuring that every detail is correct and that the investigative interview covered all aspects of the charge, and any inaccurate information can be used to weaken management's stance. The episode also discusses the "official discussion" requirement in Article 16.2 of the JCAM, reminding listeners that management is required to have a formal, private discussion with the employee before issuing discipline for minor offenses. There is also mention of Article 16.3 and the letter of warning, and that Article 16.7 talks about due process and the procedure that must be followed to issue discipline. Corey advises shop stewards to challenge any claims by management that an official discussion took place when it did not. C-31277: Arbitrator Louise Wolitz “What is in that notice must be true and correct if the removal is to be for just cause.”

Corey explains the importance of understanding the "official discussion" requirement in Article 16.2 of the Joint Contract Administration Manual (JCAM). He explains that management is required to have a formal, private discussion with an employee before issuing discipline for a minor offense. He highlights how management often misrepresents these discussions, claiming they occurred when they actually did not. Corey encourages shop stewards to challenge these claims, as they can be used to weaken management's side of a grievance. He emphasizes the importance of scrutinizing dates and details within disciplinary notices.

Corey explains what to do when a carrier receives discipline from management. The most important initial step is to have the carrier sign the disciplinary notice, as management has been known to use a carrier's refusal to sign as a reason for discipline. He then dives into the importance of requesting information during the informal Step A stage, stressing that the shop steward should request everything management used to issue the discipline, rather than waiting until later. This allows the steward to gather the necessary information and prepare a strong grievance. (Note from editor: When requesting any and all information used to issue discipline, you should only include information that helps your case OR information when management changes their stance. You don't need to help management's case in Formal A/Step B/Arbitration!). Corey emphasizes that the shop steward should not rush to file a grievance immediately but should utilize the 14-day window to gather evidence and build a solid case. He emphasizes the importance of thorough research and understanding the nuances of the discipline process.

Corey discusses the Office of Inspector General (OIG) and Postal Inspectors, highlighting their tendency towards dishonesty. He shares his experience with their investigations and argues that they often act on behalf of management with the aim of finding carriers guilty. He emphasizes that even though postal inspectors may seem intimidating, they are still bound by the contract and should be held accountable. He encourages shop stewards to be proactive and take detailed notes during any interactions with the OIG or postal inspectors, as these agencies are known for misrepresenting information. Corey suggests requesting the handwritten notes of the inspectors to ensure accuracy and to potentially raise an Article 17-31 grievance if needed. He reminds listeners that the carrier's day in court is crucial and that they must be truthful and protected by the shop steward. He emphasizes that the shop steward needs to stand firm against intimidation tactics and advocate for the carrier's rights.

Corey discusses the importance of the investigative interview in the grievance process, and how a poorly conducted interview can jeopardize the entire case. He stresses the importance of the carrier's right to a pre-interview consultation with a shop steward prior to the investigative interview. Corey describes the procedure for what the steward is to expect and how to conduct their business during the interview. He further emphasizes that this right is protected by Weingarten rights (NLRB vs. Weingarten, Inc. 1975) and that the shop steward should not be a silent observer during the interview. The shop steward should be actively involved and ensure the carrier is aware of their rights. He also highlights the importance of writing down questions and answers verbatim and avoiding leading or accusatory questions from management. The carrier's right to know the charges against them and defend themselves before discipline is initiated, as it is their “day in court,” and that management must have just cause for discipline. *notes to be considered in adding: accusatory questioning, fabricated questions and falsified answers, citations of all documents, expectations for the carrier to tell the truth* Notable documents: M-1668, C-23987, C-26281. Link to the National Labor Relations Board Weingarten Rights: https://www.nlrb.gov/about-nlrb/rights-we-protect/your-rights/weingarten-rights#:~:text=This%20right%20was%20first%20articulated,without%20a%20requested%20representative%20present.

All about the shop steward and advice from Corey to stewards, including certification via Article 17, the workroom floor environment, work ethic and integrity, an individuals reputation as a credible and reliable source, understanding our handbooks and manuals (M-41 and M-39), and time sensitivity behind a grievance case. Corey discusses the importance of being a good shop steward. He emphasizes that the position is often thankless and requires dedication and integrity. He stresses the importance of being properly certified as a shop steward via Article 17 and knowing the relevant sections of the Joint Contract Administration Manual (JCAM), particularly Article 16 (discipline) and Article 41 (opting, etc). He also emphasizes the importance of a strong work ethic, honesty, and integrity, as a reputation for dishonesty can be detrimental to a shop steward's effectiveness. He affirms that shop stewards should be knowledgeable and proactive in representing their fellow carriers.

Corey Walton, a 27+ year city letter carrier and shop steward since 2006, introduces his podcast "From A to Arbitration" aimed at helping people navigate the grievance process in labor organizations. He discusses the various handbooks and manuals used in the grievance process, including the Joint Contract Administration Manual (JCAM), and the M-39 and M-41 handbooks related to city letter carriers. Corey outlines the topics he will cover, including the informal and formal steps of the grievance process, the role of the B-Team (the second level of the grievance process), and arbitration. He shares his personal experience as a shop steward and an arbitration advocate, emphasizing his dedication to understanding the grievance process and helping others. He also highlights his involvement in the NALC and USPS safety task force, regional training, and his commitment to being a resource for others in the field. The podcast aims to provide valuable insights and guidance on the grievance process, particularly for new advocates, shop stewards, and those seeking to understand the intricacies of labor relations.

Your message was sent

My Sentiment & Notes From A to Arbitration

From A to Arbitration