Muslim Brotherhood Coming Into Focus, Trump Sent A Message, The Fight Is Not Over – Ep. 3769
Podcast: X22 ReportPublished On: Thu Nov 06 2025
Description: Watch The X22 Report On Video No videos found (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:17532056201798502,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-9437-3289"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="https://cdn2.decide.dev/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs");pt> The [DS]/[CB] are still pushing the climate hoax, they will not stop, they believe they are still in control. Layoffs surge because of DOGE, this is to be expected as we transition. Oil prices are dropping and food prices are dropping. The [DS]/[CB] are trying to stop Trump using tariffs, this will fail. The [DS] is being brought down a path of destruction, they are now replacing the old D's with far left candidates. Never interfere with an enemy while they are in the process of destroying themselves. Trump is going to use Mamdani to win the midterms. This will also lead into making the Muslim Brotherhood and terrorist organization. Trump sees the [DS] trying to divide the movement, he sent a message that the fight is not over. Economy https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1986458865743855736 October Layoffs Surge Most Since 2003 Amid Cost-Cutting, AI Adoption, Challenger Data Shows companies slashing 153,000 jobs, nearly triple last year's total and the highest for that month since 2003, according to a new report from outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. Technology and warehousing jobs led the layoffs, mostly because companies are slashing folks who were hired during the pandemic-era overhiring period. "This is the highest total for October in over 20 years, and the highest total for a single month in the fourth quarter since 2008. Like in 2003, a disruptive technology is changing the landscape." " Source: Bloomberg Which industries cut the most in October? Technology: 33,281 cuts in October (up from 5,639 in September); 141,159 YTD (+17% y/y). Warehousing: 47,878 cuts (up from 984); 90,418 YTD (+378% y/y) — signaling automation and excess capacity post-pandemic. Reasons for the cuts: "DOGE Impact" remains the leading reason for job cut announcements in 2025, cited in 293,753 planned layoffs so far this year. This includes direct reductions to the Federal workforce and its contractors. An additional 20,976 cuts have been attributed to DOGE Downstream Impact, which reflects the loss of federal funding to private and non-profit entities. In October alone, Cost-Cutting was the top reason employers cited for job reductions, responsible for 50,437 announced layoffs. Artificial Intelligence (AI) was the second-most cited factor, leading to 31,039 job cuts as companies continue to restructure and automate. AI has been cited for 48,414 job cuts this year. Source: zerohedge.com (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:18510697282300316,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-8599-9832"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="https://cdn2.decide.dev/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs"); https://twitter.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1986155277478187495 https://twitter.com/MJTruthUltra/status/1986239717172560316 matter what. The answer is, these judges are going to side with Donald Trump.” **Section 232** refers to a provision in the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (specifically, 19 U.S.C. § 1862), which grants the U.S. President broad authority to impose tariffs, quotas, or other trade restrictions on imports deemed a threat to national security. It empowers the President to act unilaterally if imports could impair U.S. national security, such as by weakening domestic industries critical to defense (e.g., steel or aluminum production). - The Department of Commerce conducts an investigation (typically 270 days) to assess the impact of imports. If a threat is found, the President has 90 days to decide on remedies, which could include tariffs or negotiations with trading partners. - Notably invoked during the Trump administration in 2018 for 25% tariffs on steel and 10% on aluminum imports from various countries, citing national security risks to U.S. manufacturing. Similar actions have occurred under other presidents, though less frequently. In the context of your quote, Section 232 underscores the expansive executive powers on trade policy—often bypassing Congress or courts—allowing a president like Trump to pursue tariffs even amid legal challenges, as it's framed as a national security tool rather than pure economic policy. https://twitter.com/onechancefreedm/status/1986132577405620645 negotiations before the other side adjusts. If the courts take that away, the U.S. loses some of that unpredictability and in geopolitics, predictability can be weakness. It also creates confusion at home. Businesses that moved supply chains, invested in domestic production, or hedged around those tariffs suddenly face uncertainty again. That kind of policy whiplash slows capital formation and risks undoing some of the strategic reshoring that’s been building. Now, imagine Congress itself were compromised even subtly by foreign influence. That’s not a partisan issue; it’s a national security nightmare. Congress controls trade law, budgets, and oversight of the defense and intelligence communities. If foreign money or pressure were shaping votes on tariffs, sanctions, or defense spending, you’re talking about an invisible form of capture, rewriting the rules of U.S. power from the inside out. It’s not dramatic like a missile test, but strategically, it’s worse. You’d have an adversary quietly guiding your levers of economic deterrence while you think you’re still holding them. If the courts say the president can’t use IEEPA to impose tariffs, there are still lawful ways to force the issue. He could invoke Section 232, which allows trade measures on national security grounds, it’s been upheld repeatedly in court. He could also use Section 301 to target unfair practices, as long as it’s procedurally sound. Or he could use Section 122 to impose short term tariffs and push Congress to extend them, effectively cornering them into acting. Beyond tariffs, he can lean on export controls, CFIUS reviews, and the Defense Production Act to tighten pressure through other channels. The point is legality doesn’t mean impotence, it just shifts the battlefield from executive speed to legislative confrontation. So if those tariffs fall, the fight doesn’t end. It just moves from the courtroom to the chessboard and how the president plays that next move will tell you whether this is about trade policy or about who really controls America’s strategic instruments. https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1986187339161329684 impose tariffs by the end of this year for something? https://twitter.com/TheLaurenChen/status/1986376673844207725 https://twitter.com/RapidResponse47/status/1986183397635457465 Political/Rights New York City Council Member Wants Almost $200 Million to Defend Illegal Immigrants From ICE (VIDEO) https://twitter.com/thestustustudio/status/1986168276611702837 to triple the city’s immigration defense budget. “What we witnessed in Los Angeles, Chicago, and elsewhere this year is nothing less than a full scale assault on democracy.” “Federal troops sent onto city streets to serve Donald Trump’s fascist agenda and terrorize our immigrant siblings.” “They’re looking for any pretext, any opportunity to invade our streets under the banner of ‘security.’” Officials from the Mayor’s Office of Immigrant Affairs (MOIA) then cited Vera Institute of Justice data showing it would cost $188.5 million to “provide services to every immigrant New Yorker,” broken down as $145 million for free legal counsel and $43.5 million for other immigration services. In June, the city doubled this budget to about $120 million, and now MOIA wants multi-year contracts and even more money—with Cabán urging that these networks operate “with the broadest, lowest barrier access to dollars as soon as possible.” Taxpayers are being forced to bankroll activist lawyers who block deportations and build a permanent sanctuary machine in New York City. Source: thegatewaypundit.com https://twitter.com/DHSgov/status/1986171260464742835 illegal alien from Colombia. Officers attempted to pull over this vehicle, which was registered to a female illegal alien, with sirens and emergency lights, but the male driver refused to pull the vehicle over. Law enforcement pursued the vehicle before the assailant sped into a shopping plaza where he and the female passenger fled the vehicle. They ran into a daycare and attempted to barricade themselves inside the daycare—recklessly endangering the children inside. The illegal alien female was arrested inside a vestibule, not in the school. Upon arrest, she lied about her identity. The vehicle is registered to in her name, though she claims that she didn’t know the man who was driving her car and just picked him up from a bus stop. Facts including criminality and information on the male assailant are forthcoming and we will update the public with more information as soon as it becomes available. https://twitter.com/TriciaOhio/status/1986157885768847847 the male driver refused to pull the vehicle over. Law enforcement pursued the vehicle before the assailant sped into a shopping plaza where he and the female passenger fled the vehicle. They ran into a daycare and attempted to barricade themselves inside the daycare—recklessly endangering the children inside. The illegal alien female was arrested inside a vestibule, not in the school. Upon arrest, she lied about her identity. The vehicle is registered to in her name,
The note was deleted
The note was saved
Your message was sent